journal article·2022-06Open access

Bacterial cellulose-natural fiber composites produced by fibers extracted from banana peel waste

Muhammad Awais Naeem, Qasim Siddiqui, Muhammad Rafique Khan, Muhammad Mushtaq, Muhammad Wasim, Amjad Farooq, Tayyad Naveed, Qufu Wei

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 1_suppl

Abstract

In recent times, there is a growing demand for low-cost raw materials, renewable resources, and eco-friendly end products. Natural fibers are considered as strong candidates to be used as a potential reinforcement for composite manufacturing. In the current study, natural fibers extracted from banana peel were coated with bacterial cellulose through a green biosynthesis approach as well as by a simple slurry dipping method. Thus, natural fibers from banana peel waste were used the first time, to produce bacterial cellulose-natural fiber composites. SEM analysis revealed good interaction between the hybrid fibers and the epoxy matrix. Thermal gravimetric analysis results revealed that the degradation temperature increases because of the addition of bacterial cellulose on fiber surface, which improves the thermal stability. The maximum thermal decomposition temperature (405°C) was noticed for nanocomposites reinforced by banana fibers with bacterial cellulose deposited on their surface. Whereas the lowest weight loss was also found for the same sample group. The highest tensile strength (57.95 MPa) was found for SBC-BP/epoxy, followed by DBC-BP/epoxy (54.73 MPa) and NBP/epoxy (45.32 MPa) composites, respectively. Composites reinforced by both types of hybrid banana fibers shown comparatively higher tensile performance as compared with the neat banana peel fiber-epoxy composites, which can be attributed to the high strength and stiffness associated with the bacterial cellulose. Overall, this study suggests a successful and green route for the fabrication of natural fiber-reinforced composites with improved properties such as tensile strength and thermal stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Eco-Textiles, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China

Department of Textile Engineering, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan

School of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

School of Textile and Design, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Textile Fibers and Materials, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DF.23.610.4028/www.scientific.net/DF.23.6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.16710.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.167 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.19510.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.195 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.013 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ejpe.2017.11.005 ↗
7. 10.3390/fib504003610.3390/fib5040036 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.015 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.8b1301810.1021/acsami.8b13018 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12221-014-2607-410.1007/s12221-014-2607-4 ↗
11. 10.1080/09276440.2016.113717810.1080/09276440.2016.1137178 ↗
12. Auli N · Mater Sci Forum · 2015 · 840 · 394
13. 10.1080/15440478.2018.156358010.1080/15440478.2018.1563580 ↗
14. 10.15446/ing.investig.v32n1.2852410.15446/ing.investig.v32n1.28524 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10800810.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108008 ↗
18. 10.1177/002199831984229510.1177/0021998319842295 ↗
19. 10.1080/15583724.2014.89601810.1080/15583724.2014.896018 ↗
20. Qiu K and · 2015 · 325
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.025 ↗
22. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.04.00210.1016/j.apmt.2018.04.002 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1007071210.3390/polym10070712 ↗
25. Naeem MA · J Indus Text · 2019 · 1
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.002 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570-018-2084-910.1007/s10570-018-2084-9 ↗
28. 10.1271/bbb.59.149810.1271/bbb.59.1498 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20130426910.1002/adfm.201304269 ↗
30. 10.3390/fib503003110.3390/fib5030031 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.015 ↗
33. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
34. Rambo MKD · J Brazil Chem Soc · 2015 · 26 · 1491
35. 10.1080/17480272.2018.148236810.1080/17480272.2018.1482368 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10570-013-0138-610.1007/s10570-013-0138-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.074 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.01310.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.013 ↗
39. 10.1039/c3ra45732j10.1039/c3ra45732j ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.03410.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.034 ↗
41. Waghmare P · Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol · 2017 · 7 · 887
42. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗