journal article·2019-11

Appraisal of electrospun textile scaffold comprising polyurethane decorated with ginger nanofibers for wound healing applications

Mohan Prasath Mani, Saravana Kumar Jaganathan, Ahmad Fauzi Ismail

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 49· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Nowadays, the synthetic biodegradable polymeric scaffolds were widely utilized for skin tissue engineering applications. The usage of nanofibrous scaffold manufactured through textile technologies has gained a widespread cynosure in wound healing applications. In this study, an electrospun textile scaffold based on polyurethane polymer incorporated with ginger extracts is hypothesized to possess unique properties facilitating wound healing. The fabricated electrospun membranes were characterized through scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared, thermogravimetric analysis, atomic force microscopy, and contact angle measurements. Coagulation assays such as activated prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and hemolysis assay were performed for the electrospun membranes to determine their antithrombogenicity nature. Further, the cytocompatibility studies were evaluated using human dermal fibroblast cells to determine the toxicity of the electrospun polyurethane and their blends. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the reduced fiber (615 ± 154.31 nm) and pore (706 ± 90.07 nm) than the control (fiber diameter 1159 ± 147.48 nm and pore diameter 1087 ± 62.51 nm). Upon ginger incorporation, the wettability (80.33° ± 4.51) and surface roughness (389 nm) of the polyurethane was improved revealed in the contact angle and atomic force microscopy analysis. Infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis study revealed the interaction of ginger with polyurethane by showing hydrogen bond formation and leaving an excess residue. The fabricated nanocomposites exhibited faster blood clotting time indicated in the activated prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time. Further, hemolytic index and cytocompatibility studies revealed that the fabricated nanocomposites (Hemolytic index—0.96% and proliferation rate—159 ± 5.57%) showed nontoxic nature to the red blood cells and enhanced proliferation rate of human dermal fibroblast cells compared to the pristine polyurethane (hemolytic index—2.56% and proliferation rate—132 ± 3.61%). Our findings showed that polyurethane-based fibrous scaffolds comprising ginger exhibited desirable characteristics suitable for skin tissue engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

IJNUTM Cardiovascular Engineering center, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/14732300090370053110.1177/147323000903700531 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-455-0.00001-X10.1016/B978-1-78242-455-0.00001-X ↗
3. 10.7603/s40681-015-0022-910.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 ↗
4. 10.1089/wound.2012.040110.1089/wound.2012.0401 ↗
5. Rohan S. Wound care market worth 22.01 Billion USD by 2022, https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/wound-care.asp (2018, accessed 30 March 2018).
6. 10.1155/2012/71413410.1155/2012/714134 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat182210.1038/nmat1822 ↗
8. 10.1002/adhm.20150051710.1002/adhm.201500517 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.2148110.1002/app.21481 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00510.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.005 ↗
11. Lamba NMK · 1998
12. 10.1021/bm200721810.1021/bm2007218 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.19810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.198 ↗
14. Malu SP · Global J Pure Appl Sci · 2009 · 15 · 365
15. 10.1155/2015/14297910.1155/2015/142979 ↗
16. Kemper KJ. Ginger (Zingiber officinale)—Longwood Herbal Task Force, http://www.mcp.edu/herbal/default.htm (1999, accessed 24 June 2018).
17. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00483.x10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00483.x ↗
18. Mohamed AHB · J Dis Med Plants · 2017 · 3 · 1
19. 10.1515/bmt-2017-002210.1515/bmt-2017-0022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.07110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.071 ↗
21. Premuzic ET and Woodhead A. Microbial enhancement of oil recovery- Recent Advances . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993.
22. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/04410610.1088/1748-6041/4/4/044106 ↗
23. 10.1177/088532821452900210.1177/0885328214529002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.029 ↗
25. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001024)78:4<850::AID-APP190>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/1097-4628(20001024)78:4<850::AID-APP190>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.070 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.008 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.07110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.071 ↗
29. Szycher M · 1991
30. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d010.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d0 ↗
31. 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.40710.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.407 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.b.3063810.1002/jbm.b.30638 ↗