Optimization of alkali treatment condition on jute fabric for the development of rigid biocomposite
Source abstract
Abstract
Jute fiber has poor compatibility with hydrophobic thermosetting polymeric resin for the development of a biocomposite. In this present study, plain weave jute fabric was treated with 1% sodium hydroxide (owf) in three different time (30, 60 and 90 minutes), temperature (30, 40 and 50℃) and material-to-liquor ratio (1:5, 1:10 and 1:15) as per orthogonal array and the treated jute fabrics were used for the preparation of the biocomposite sheet by hand laying-cum-compression moulding method. Developed biocomposite sheets were evaluated for their mechanical properties as per ASTM standards and results were analyzed by Taguchi model to optimize the sodium hydroxide treatment condition. Results inferred that jute fabric reinforcement treated with 1% sodium hydroxide at 50℃ for 60 minutes in 1:10 material-to-liquor ratio could be the optimum condition to develop the biocomposite sheet with higher mechanical properties than other conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bio-composite Laboratory, Chemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-National Institute of Research on Jute and Allied Fibre Technology, Kolkata, India
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0271008910.1007/BF02710089 ↗
2. 10.1177/002199830606988910.1177/0021998306069889 ↗
3. 10.1080/15440478.2013.82484910.1080/15440478.2013.824849 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12633-012-9110-610.1007/s12633-012-9110-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.008 ↗
6. 10.1163/156855109X42875410.1163/156855109X428754 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.01010.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.07310.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.073 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.04310.1016/j.msea.2009.01.043 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.02010.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.020 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168440809397310.1177/0731684408093973 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.002 ↗
14. 10.12783/issn.2168-4286/1.1/Islam10.12783/issn.2168-4286/1.1/Islam ↗
15. ASTM D2734 – 09. Standard test methods for void content of reinforced plastics . ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009.
16. ASTM D5035-11. Standard test method for breaking force and elongation of textile fabrics (Strip method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.001 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990124)71:4<623::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990124)71:4<623::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
19. 10.1080/1944702480865940110.1080/19447024808659401 ↗
20. 10.1080/0040500930865896710.1080/00405009308658967 ↗
21. Mavruz S · Fibers Text East Eur · 2010 · 18 · 78
22. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
23. Hong GB · Fibers Text East Eur · 2012 · 20 · 75
24. Nevell TP · 1985
25. Taguchi G · 2005
26. 10.1186/1477-7800-1-110.1186/1477-7800-1-1 ↗
27. 10.1080/00405000.2015.106173610.1080/00405000.2015.1061736 ↗
28. Mwaikambo LY · Bio Resour · 2009 · 4 · 566
29. 10.1177/073168441244939910.1177/0731684412449399 ↗
30. Tran HN · Adv Compos Mater · 2015 · 24 · 16110.1080/09243046.2014.976733 ↗