Evaluation of high-modulus, puncture-resistance composite nonwoven fabrics by response surface methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Recycled high-modulus Kevlar fibers were blended with Nylon 6 staple fibers and biocomponent low- T m /high- T m polyester fibers to form high-modulus puncture-resistance nonwoven fabrics via opening, mixing, carding, lapping, needle-punching, as well as hot-pressing processes. In this paper, biocomponent low- T m /high- T m polyester fiber content, needle-punching density, and hot-pressing temperature were changed to evaluate the tensile strength, bursting strength and static puncture resistance of resulting nonwoven fabrics as related to aforementioned three parameters based on response surface methodology. The result shows that the tensile strength is highly related to needle-punching density and hot-pressing temperature; but the bursting strength and static puncture resistance are significantly involved with the aforementioned three parameters. The tensile strength, bursting strength, and static puncture resistance all present increasing and then decreasing trend with increase of its respective concerning parameters. Moreover, the static puncture resistance strength has linear dependence on bursting strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textiles, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China
Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Material Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Laboratory of Fiber Application and Manufacturing, Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan
School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Ye LL · China Text Leader · 2000 · 5 · 36
2. Jiang YK · Cotton Text Technol · 2000 · 28 · 4
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.55-57.42910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.55-57.429 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12221-010-0500-310.1007/s12221-010-0500-3 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.239-242.68310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.239-242.683 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-290.274810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-290.2748 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.239-242.334210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.239-242.3342 ↗
8. Xu ZH · J Hwa Gang Text · 2003 · 10 · 95
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.55-57.40510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.55-57.405 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051750809049210.1177/0040517508090492 ↗
11. Sukigara S · Part 2. Process optimization and empirical modeling using response surface methodology. Polym · 2004 · 45 · 3701
12. 10.1002/mame.20050021510.1002/mame.200500215 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.01310.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.013 ↗
14. 10.1177/152808370708159410.1177/1528083707081594 ↗
15. Surajit S · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2008 · 33 · 411
16. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D5035 · 2011
17. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2054 · 2007
18. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F1342 · 2005
19. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.03.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.03.006 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.3489010.1002/app.34890 ↗
22. Wang L · Comput Model Eng Sci · 2007 · 20 · 11
23. 10.1520/GTJ10002J10.1520/GTJ10002J ↗
24. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000048751.55710.4410.1023/B:JMSC.0000048751.55710.44 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2004.06.00210.1016/j.tafmec.2004.06.002 ↗