Development of composites, reinforced by novel 3D woven orthogonal fabrics with enhanced auxeticity
Source abstract
Abstract
Auxetic materials are under great attention of researchers due to their excellent mechanical response under certain conditions. Previous works have been carried out in knitted or uni-stretch woven fabrics. In the present study, three-dimensional (3D) woven structures were produced and the effect of float length of ground weave and binding yarn on auxeticity of the fabric was investigated. Eight different 3D orthogonal woven structures/reinforcements were produced on rapier dobby loom by changing the float length in ground weave and binding yarns. Hand layup technique was used for composite fabrication, while green epoxy resin was used as a matrix. For investigating the auxeticity, 3D reinforcement samples were subjected to tensile loading and change in their thickness was measured. The results showed that 3D woven reinforcements with equal and maximum float length of ground weave and binding yarn showed greater auxetic behavior, because both weaves support each other and room for opening of structure increases. As the difference between the float length of ground weave and binding yarns increases, the auxeticity of reinforcement decreases because the ground weave and binding yarn cancel out the effect of each other. Moreover, the impact energy absorption of the developed composites was found to increase with the increase in float length, justifying that the structures are auxetic in nature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Weaving, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0040500960865905910.1080/00405009608659059 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168441775105910.1177/0731684417751059 ↗
3. Chen X · Handb Tech Text Second Ed · 2015 · 1 · 285
4. Gnaba I, Legrand X, Wang P, et al. Through-the-thickness reinforcement for composite structures: a review. J Ind Text . Epub ahead of print 26 April 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718772299.10.1177/1528083718772299 ↗
5. Kashif M, Hamdani STA, Nawab Y, et al. Optimization of 3D woven preform for improved mechanical performance. J Ind Text . Epub ahead of print 16 March 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718760802.10.1177/1528083718760802 ↗
6. 10.1002/pen.2031110.1002/pen.20311 ↗
7. Hu H · J Text Eng Fash Technol · 2016 · 1 · 1
8. 10.1243/09544100JAERO18510.1243/09544100JAERO185 ↗
9. Liu Q · Technical Report, Aust Gov Dep Def · 2006 · 1
10. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104906910.1080/00405000.2015.1049069 ↗
11. 10.1177/152808370934988510.1177/1528083709349885 ↗
12. 10.1080/00405000.2012.67626710.1080/00405000.2012.676267 ↗
13. 10.1177/152808370404584710.1177/1528083704045847 ↗
14. 10.1177/152808370909201410.1177/1528083709092014 ↗
15. 10.1177/004051751244905110.1177/0040517512449051 ↗
16. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
17. 10.1002/pssb.20155276810.1002/pssb.201552768 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.025 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.06310.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.063 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.016 ↗
22. 10.1177/152808371770200910.1177/1528083717702009 ↗
23. Ma P, Jin L and Wu L. Experimental and numerical comparisons of ballistic impact behaviors between 3D angle-interlock woven fabric and its reinforced composite. J Ind Text . Epub ahead of print 19 January 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718754903.10.1177/1528083718754903 ↗
24. Liaqat M · J Text Inst · 2017 · 108 · 1264
25. 10.1080/09737189.2012.1188535410.1080/09737189.2012.11885354 ↗
26. 10.1177/152808371665446810.1177/1528083716654468 ↗