journal article·2022-06Open access

Branched nanofibers with tiny diameters for air filtration via one-step electrospinning

Bilal Zaarour, Hussen Tina, Lei Zhu, XiangYu Jin

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 1_suppl

Abstract

Engineering the surface morphology of fibers has been attracting significant consideration in various areas and applications. In this study, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) branched nanofibers with a diameter of less than 50 nm are electrospun directly at a low relative humidity by adding tetrabutylammonium chloride. The effects of the branched structure on the specific surface area and pore size distribution are investigated, and the filtration properties of the air filter based on branched nanofiber webs with different basis weights are studied. The results exhibit that the air filter based on PVDF branched nanofibers with the basis weight of 1 g/m 2 has an outstanding filtration efficiency (99.999%) to 0.26 µm sodium chloride particles under the pressure drop of 126.17 Pa. We believe that this study can be used as a useful reference for the preparation of branched nanofibers through one-step electrospinning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Research Center of Technical Textiles, Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua, University, Shanghai, China

Textile Industries Mechanical Engineering and Techniques Department, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Funding

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang S, Rind NA, Tang N, et al. Electrospun nanofibers for air filtration. In: Ding B, Wang X and Yu J (eds) Electrospinning: nanofabrication and applications . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, pp.365–389.10.1016/B978-0-323-51270-1.00012-1 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40843-018-9320-410.1007/s40843-018-9320-4 ↗
3. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.6510.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.65 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.01710.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.017 ↗
5. 10.1177/152808371667681210.1177/1528083716676812 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.09410.1016/j.msec.2019.04.094 ↗
7. 10.1088/2053-1591/aab6ef10.1088/2053-1591/aab6ef ↗
8. 10.1007/s13762-018-1649-310.1007/s13762-018-1649-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.05310.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.053 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.03510.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.035 ↗
11. 10.1155/2014/85965610.1155/2014/859656 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.6b0472010.1021/acsami.6b04720 ↗
13. 10.1002/pat.459410.1002/pat.4594 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0059310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 ↗
15. 10.1002/pat.487610.1002/pat.4876 ↗
16. 10.1080/1539445X.2019.161406010.1080/1539445X.2019.1614060 ↗
17. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6c1e10.1088/2053-1591/ab6c1e ↗
18. 10.1002/pat.425510.1002/pat.4255 ↗
19. 10.1177/004051751879274810.1177/0040517518792748 ↗
20. 10.1134/S207020511901025810.1134/S2070205119010258 ↗
21. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab539610.1088/2053-1591/ab5396 ↗
22. 10.3390/s1802033010.3390/s18020330 ↗
23. 10.1186/s11671-018-2705-010.1186/s11671-018-2705-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.06.00310.1016/j.coco.2019.06.003 ↗
25. 10.1002/mame.20180033610.1002/mame.201800336 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.34210.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.342 ↗
27. 10.1002/slct.20190398110.1002/slct.201903981 ↗
28. 10.1039/C4TA06191H10.1039/C4TA06191H ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.04110.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.041 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.06210.1016/j.cej.2014.08.062 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00004-910.1016/S1359-0294(03)00004-9 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.09.00210.1016/j.seppur.2010.09.002 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8RA09257E10.1039/C8RA09257E ↗
34. 10.1080/1539445X.2019.158254210.1080/1539445X.2019.1582542 ↗
35. 10.1080/1539445X.2010.49563010.1080/1539445X.2010.495630 ↗
36. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab582d10.1088/2053-1591/ab582d ↗
37. 10.1039/C1JM14299B10.1039/C1JM14299B ↗
38. 10.1252/kakoronbunshu.40.8410.1252/kakoronbunshu.40.84 ↗
39. 10.1021/ie300574m10.1021/ie300574m ↗
40. 10.3390/ma702101710.3390/ma7021017 ↗
41. Cheremisinoff NP. Liquid filtration . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.
42. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.02610.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.026 ↗
43. Kirsh VA. · Colloid J Russ Acad Sci · 2000 · 62 · 714
44. 10.1177/155892501985079810.1177/1558925019850798 ↗
45. 10.1038/pj.2014.7410.1038/pj.2014.74 ↗
46. 10.1002/anie.20170376610.1002/anie.201703766 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.206092810.1063/1.2060928 ↗
48. 10.1557/jmr.2014.21410.1557/jmr.2014.214 ↗
49. 10.1155/2018/816418510.1155/2018/8164185 ↗
50. Zaarour B, Zhu L, Huang C, et al. A review on piezoelectric fibers and nanowires for energy harvesting. J Ind Text 2019. DOI: 1528083719870197.
51. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.05510.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.055 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.04710.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.047 ↗
53. 10.1002/app.2549810.1002/app.25498 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.02810.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.028 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.03610.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.036 ↗
56. 10.1201/978042908576510.1201/9780429085765 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.04110.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.041 ↗
58. 10.1039/c2ra22086e10.1039/c2ra22086e ↗
59. 10.1002/mame.20160035310.1002/mame.201600353 ↗