journal article·2022-06Open access

Mechanical performance of 3D woven jute/green epoxy composites with novel weaving patterns

Muhammad Umair, Syed Talha Ali Hamdani, Muzzamal Hussain, Yasir Nawab

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 4_suppl

Abstract

Green composites have ecofriendly features that are technically and economically feasible while minimizing the pollution. It refers to the combination of degradable fibers mostly cellulosic materials and natural resins to develop green composites. Since mechanical performance of such structures is a concern for industry, by playing with the position and pattern of yarns in woven fabric, these properties can be optimized. This research focuses on the development and characterization of novel 3D woven jute/green epoxy composites having hybrid interlocking patterns. Four conventional derivatives of 3D woven fabrics i.e. orthogonal layer to layer (OLL), orthogonal through thickness (OTT), angle interlock layer to layer (ALL), angle interlock through thickness (ATT) and three novel 3D woven fabrics i.e. H1 (combination of OTT and ATT binder yarns), H2 (combination of OTT and ALL binder yarns), H3 (combination of orthogonal layer to layer warp and weft interlock called as bi-directional interlock) were developed using different binding patterns on dobby loom. Tensile, flexural, and short beam shear tests were performed to check the mechanical performance of the developed composites. OTT composite structure showed the highest values of tensile strength, modulus, and maximum force both in warp and weft directions as compared to the other 3D interlock structures, due to least interlacement/crimp of binder yarn. While ATT composite exhibited the highest value of flexural strength and modulus both in warp and weft directions due to through thickness angle binder yarns. H3 composite showed the highest values of force and short beam shear strength in warp direction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Textile Composite Materials Research Group, National Center for Composite Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Funding

Higher Education Commision, Pakistan

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.07810.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-1-85573-739-6.50004-X10.1016/B978-1-85573-739-6.50004-X ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014 ↗
4. Senthilkannan Muthu S, Kowloon, Kong H. Green composites: sustainable raw material . Singapore: Springer, 2019.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.013 ↗
6. 10.1177/00405175020720030210.1177/004051750207200302 ↗
7. Chen X, Knox RT, Mckenna DF, et al. Relation between linear linkage and mechanical properties of 3D woven textile structures. Tech Res Centre Finland Text Compos 1992; 166–172.
8. Miravete A. 3-D textile reinforcements in composite materials (PA Miravete, ed.). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2000.10.1533/9781845691929 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199831349053910.1177/0021998313490539 ↗
10. Sun D, Chen X. Three-dimensional textiles for protective clothing . 2015. Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-1-78242-214-3.00013-9 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051751348779110.1177/0040517513487791 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
13. Grosicki ZJ. · 1975
14. 10.1080/00405000.2012.67626710.1080/00405000.2012.676267 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.033 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.003 ↗
18. 10.1177/073168441244432510.1177/0731684412444325 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0261-3069(02)00053-510.1016/S0261-3069(02)00053-5 ↗
20. Pankow M, Yen C, Rudolph M, et al. 2012. Experimental investigation on the deformation response of hybrid 3D woven composites. In: 53rd Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference , pp. 1–19. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2012-1572 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.032 ↗
22. 10.1007/s12221-014-1950-910.1007/s12221-014-1950-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.02010.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.020 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.011 ↗
25. 10.1080/00405000.2013.81226610.1080/00405000.2013.812266 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.05510.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.055 ↗
28. 10.1177/002199831244314110.1177/0021998312443141 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.028 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.403145510.1115/1.4031455 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.03.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2013.03.005 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831141221810.1177/0021998311412218 ↗
34. 10.1177/073168441245062610.1177/0731684412450626 ↗
35. 10.1177/004051751143501310.1177/0040517511435013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.008 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.023 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.09210.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.092 ↗
39. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02502710.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025027 ↗
40. Castellucci M, Klute S, Lally EM, et al. Three-axis distributed fiber optic strain measurement in 3D woven composite structures. Proc SPIE 8690, Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies , 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012221 (2013, accessed 23 July 2020).10.1117/12.2012221 ↗
41. 10.1177/004051751243683110.1177/0040517512436831 ↗
42. Brouwer WD. 2000. Natural fibre composites in structural components, alternative for sisal. Joint FAO/CFC Seminar .
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.03210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.032 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.021 ↗
46. ASTM International. ASTM D2344/D2344M − standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards , pp.1–8, https://doi.org/10.1520/D2344 (2011, accessed 22 July 2020).
47. ASTM International. ASTM D3039/D3039M – standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards , 2014, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039 (2014, accessed 22 July 2020).
48. ASTM International. ASTM D7264/D7264M – Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards , pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264 (2015, accessed 22 July 2020).
49. 10.1002/pc.2081910.1002/pc.20819 ↗