journal article·2023

Temperature-responsive membrane permeability of recombinant fusion protein vesicles

Jackson Powers, Yeongseon Jang

Soft Matter· Volume 19· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the changes in the permeability of the recombinant fusion protein vesicles with different membrane structures as a function of solution temperature. The protein vesicles are self-assembled from recombinant fusion protein complexes composed of an mCherry fused with a glutamic acid-rich leucine zipper and a counter arginine-rich leucine zipper fused with an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP). We have found that the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the protein vesicle membranes varies inversely with solution temperature by monitoring the transport of fluorescent-tagged dextran dyes with different molecular weights. The temperature-responsiveness of the protein vesicle membranes is obtained from the lower critical solution temperature behavior of ELP in the protein building blocks. Consequently, the unique vesicle membrane structures with different single-layered and double-layered ELP organizations impact the sensitivity of the permeability responses of the protein vesicles. Single-layered protein vesicles with the ELP domains facing the interior show more drastic permeability changes as a function of temperature than double-layered protein vesicles in which ELP blocks are buried inside the membranes. This work about the temperature-responsive membrane permeability of unique protein vesicles will provide design guidelines for new biomaterials and their applications, such as drug delivery and synthetic protocell development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida 1006 Center Drive, FL 32669, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Yewdall · Interface Focus · 2018 · 8 · 2018002310.1098/rsfs.2018.0023 ↗
2. Olivi · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 453110.1038/s41467-021-24772-8 ↗
3. Huang · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 223910.1038/ncomms3239 ↗
4. Deshpande · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 256010.1021/acsnano.7b08411 ↗
5. Weiss · Nat. Mater. · 2018 · 17 · 8910.1038/nmat5005 ↗
6. Adamala · Nat. Chem. · 2017 · 9 · 43110.1038/nchem.2644 ↗
7. Drobot · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 364310.1038/s41467-018-06072-w ↗
8. Rideau · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 47 · 857210.1039/C8CS00162F ↗
9. Nakhaei · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2021 · 9 · 70588610.3389/fbioe.2021.705886 ↗
10. J.-L.Rigaud and D.Lévy , Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins into Liposomes , Methods in Enzymology , Academic Press , 2003 , vol. 372, pp. 65–86
11. Akbarzadeh · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2013 · 8 · 10210.1186/1556-276X-8-102 ↗
12. Aibani · Int. J. Pharm.: X · 2020 · 2 · 100040
13. Pawar · Polym. Chem. · 2013 · 4 · 316010.1039/c3py00023k ↗
14. Egli · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 447610.1021/ja110275f ↗
15. Rifaie-Graham · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 802710.1021/jacs.8b04511 ↗
16. Park · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1790610.1021/ja5090157 ↗
17. Jang · Small · 2017 · 13 · 170039910.1002/smll.201700399 ↗
18. Jang · Biomacromolecules · 2019 · 20 · 349410.1021/acs.biomac.9b00773 ↗
19. Tan · Biomacromolecules · 2020 · 21 · 433610.1021/acs.biomac.0c01147 ↗
20. Jang · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2016 · 49 · 218810.1021/acs.accounts.6b00337 ↗
21. Moll · Protein Sci. · 2001 · 10 · 64910.1110/ps.39401 ↗
22. Li · Adv. Healthc. Mater. · 2021 · 10 · e200181010.1002/adhm.202001810 ↗
23. Dautel · Biomacromolecules · 2022 · 23 · 367810.1021/acs.biomac.2c00562 ↗
24. Jeon · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 97 · 15210.1002/jbm.a.33041 ↗
25. MacEwan · Biopolymers · 2010 · 94 · 6010.1002/bip.21327 ↗
26. Le · Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. · 2019 · 4 · 54510.1039/C9ME00002J ↗
27. Desai · Biomacromolecules · 2020 · 21 · 293810.1021/acs.biomac.0c00740 ↗
28. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 481410.1002/adfm.201501489 ↗
29. Milligan · Curr. Opin. Biotechnol · 2022 · 74 · 14610.1016/j.copbio.2021.11.006 ↗
30. Li · Biomacromolecules · 2014 · 15 · 352210.1021/bm500658w ↗
31. Li · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2021 · 125 · 862710.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02822 ↗
32. Meyer · Biomacromolecules · 2004 · 5 · 84610.1021/bm034215n ↗
33. Trabbic-Carlson · Protein Eng., Des. Sel. · 2004 · 17 · 5710.1093/protein/gzh006 ↗
34. Krishna · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 281210.1039/C4CS00440J ↗
35. Tang · Biomacromolecules · 2003 · 4 · 163610.1021/bm030026t ↗
36. Chung · J. Controlled Release · 1999 · 62 · 11510.1016/S0168-3659(99)00029-2 ↗
37. Frallicciardi · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 160510.1038/s41467-022-29272-x ↗
38. Zheng · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 2252910.1002/anie.202109637 ↗
39. Ibrahimova · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 1503610.1002/anie.202102807 ↗