Humic-makeup approach for simultaneous functionalization of polyacrylonitrile nanofibers during electrospinning process, and dye adsorption study
Source abstract
Abstract
A useful methodology is represented to functionalize polyacrylonitrile nanofibers by using humic acid as a makeup agent in electrospinning process. Both morphology and surface chemistry of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats were understood to be influenced by incorporation of humic acid into the structure. Physicochemical changes were evidenced by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope, and surface charge measurements. Unlike some anionic dyes (i.e., methyl orange, methyl red, and Congo red), there was an enhancement in crystal violet (a cationic dye) adsorption after incorporation of humic acid. The Langmuir model fitted well to crystal violet data, and monolayer adsorption capacity was calculated as 81.6 mg/g (r2 = 0.998).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemistry Department, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Chemistry Department, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
Department of Bioengineering, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.05.00510.1016/j.seppur.2006.05.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.00910.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.00710.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.007 ↗
4. 10.1017/CBO978051153559810.1017/CBO9780511535598 ↗
5. 10.1006/jcis.1995.120710.1006/jcis.1995.1207 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00170-210.1016/S0927-7757(97)00170-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0956-053X(97)00041-X10.1016/S0956-053X(97)00041-X ↗
8. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)01066-410.1016/S0927-7757(01)01066-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.06510.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.065 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.02610.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.aca.2004.03.06810.1016/j.aca.2004.03.068 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.03510.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.035 ↗
13. 10.1002/pi.429810.1002/pi.4298 ↗
14. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.8010.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.80 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.19810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.198 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.10.00610.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.10.006 ↗
17. 10.1039/C3PY01335A10.1039/C3PY01335A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.aca.2012.11.02810.1016/j.aca.2012.11.028 ↗
19. 10.1002/pi.204010.1002/pi.2040 ↗
20. 10.1021/am100802410.1021/am1008024 ↗
21. 10.1039/C5SM00566C10.1039/C5SM00566C ↗
22. Langmuir I. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1916 · 38
23. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.04810.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.048 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62358-X10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62358-X ↗
25. Freundlich H.M.F. · Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 1906 · 57
26. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.01210.1016/j.desal.2007.05.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.09310.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.093 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.044 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.clay.2014.03.00410.1016/j.clay.2014.03.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.02310.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.12010.1016/j.cej.2012.11.120 ↗
32. Sabna V. · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
33. 10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.01710.1016/j.jece.2015.08.017 ↗