journal article·2020-07-02Open access

Calculation of the work of adhesion of polyisoprene on graphite by molecular dynamics simulations

M. Chiricotto, G. Giunta, H. A. Karimi-Varzaneh, P. Carbone

Soft Materials· Volume 18· Issue 2-3

Abstract

Elastomeric compounds are reinforced with fillers such as carbon-black and silica to improve mechanical, dynamical, and tribological properties. The stability and physical properties of these materials are dominated by the intermolecular interactions occurring at the polymer/particles interface that determine the magnitude of the polymer/particles adhesion. Using molecular dynamics simulations, in this work, we evaluate the solid–liquid interfacial tension and the corresponding work of adhesion for a system composed of graphite/Polyisoprene 100% cis-1,4 within a range of molar masses and temperatures. We employ a simulation strategy for estimating the surface tension of fluid/vacuum and fluid/solid interfaces that use directly the local stress fields in the Irving–Kirkwood formalism. Using such procedure, we decompose the stress field into the individual components of the stress tensor and correlate them with the values of the work of adhesion in the different systems analyzed.Abbreviation: PI (100% 1,4); MD: molecular dynamics; PT lateral component of the stress; PN normal component of the stress.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Material Physics and Computational Chemistry, Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH, Hannover, Germany

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.00610.1016/j.jcis.2013.09.006 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.5b0830910.1021/acsami.5b08309 ↗
4. 10.1021/ab500057810.1021/ab5000578 ↗
5. 10.1557/mrs.2013.10010.1557/mrs.2013.100 ↗
6. 10.1098/rsta.2018.026810.1098/rsta.2018.0268 ↗
7. 10.5254/rct.13.8793010.5254/rct.13.87930 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.01310.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.013 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0186410.1021/acs.macromol.5b01864 ↗
10. 10.1080/1539445X.2019.156826110.1080/1539445X.2019.1568261 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym1004044610.3390/polym10040446 ↗
12. 10.1038/182128a010.1038/182128a0 ↗
13. Leroy F.; Müller-Plathe F. Calculation of the Work of Adhesion of Solid-Liquid Interfaces by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. NIC Symp. Jülich (Germany) 2016.
14. 10.1016/0927-7757(94)80115-010.1016/0927-7757(94)80115-0 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0118110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01181 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp026811210.1021/jp0268112 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl015640u10.1021/nl015640u ↗
18. 10.1163/156856192X0062910.1163/156856192X00629 ↗
19. 10.1002/marc.20080074610.1002/marc.200800746 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5CS00736D10.1039/C5CS00736D ↗
21. 10.1063/1.345879610.1063/1.3458796 ↗
22. 10.1021/la104018k10.1021/la104018k ↗
23. 10.1021/ct300089j10.1021/ct300089j ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0139410.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01394 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.323169310.1063/1.3231693 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.203882710.1063/1.2038827 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.498457710.1063/1.4984577 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.174724810.1063/1.1747248 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.05160110.1103/PhysRevE.83.051601 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.03160110.1103/PhysRevE.77.031601 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.180267210.1063/1.1802672 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.504857610.1063/1.5048576 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.500847310.1063/1.5008473 ↗
34. 10.1088/0370-1298/63/5/30210.1088/0370-1298/63/5/302 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.174778210.1063/1.1747782 ↗
36. 10.1017/CBO978113900358210.1017/CBO9781139003582 ↗
37. 10.1021/ct400892610.1021/ct4008926 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp036508g10.1021/jp036508g ↗
39. 10.1063/1.44271410.1063/1.442714 ↗
40. 10.1093/qjmam/36.2.16310.1093/qjmam/36.2.163 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0180810.1021/acs.macromol.7b01808 ↗
42. 10.1021/ma050176r10.1021/ma050176r ↗
43. 10.1063/1.486391810.1063/1.4863918 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.00110.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
45. 10.1080/0892702880808094110.1080/08927028808080941 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.44907110.1063/1.449071 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b1078910.1021/acs.jpcb.5b10789 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.141649010.1063/1.1416490 ↗
49. 10.1021/ma00202a03310.1021/ma00202a033 ↗
50. 10.1002/polb.1995.09033170910.1002/polb.1995.090331709 ↗
51. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990515)37:10<1023::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990515)37:10<1023::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
52. 10.1063/1.141687210.1063/1.1416872 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.173154910.1063/1.1731549 ↗
54. 10.1021/ma60020a01610.1021/ma60020a016 ↗
55. Vanegas J. M.; Torres-Sánchez A.; Arroyo M. Computing the Local Stress Tensor in MD Simulations. 2015. http://mdstress.org/files/5914/4657/7530/Local_stress.pdf.
56. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.03.00610.1016/j.jmps.2016.03.006 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.25810210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.258102 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.07810110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.078101 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja110327r10.1021/ja110327r ↗
60. 10.1039/b901664c10.1039/b901664c ↗
61. Giunta, G.; Svaneborg, C.; Karimi-varzaneh, H. A.; Carbone, P. Effects of Graphite and Plasticizers on the Structure of Highly Entangled Polyisoprene Melts. (Under Review). ACS Applied Polymer Materials; 2019.