Evaluating the ductility characteristics of self-centering buckling-restrained shape memory alloy braces
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, self-centering earthquake resistant systems have attracted attention because of their promising potential in controlling the residual drifts and reducing repair costs after earthquake events. Considerable portion of self-centering research is based on using short-segment superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) braces as strengthening technique because of the lower modulus of elasticity of SMA in comparison with that of steel. The goal of this study is to investigate the ductility characteristics of these newly proposed short-segment SMA braces to evaluate their safety levels against fracture failures under earthquake loading. This goal has been achieved by selecting an appropriate seismic performance criterion for steel frames equipped with SMA braces, defining the level of strain capacity of SMA and calculating the strain demands in the SMA braces by conducting a series of pushover and earthquake time history analyzes on typical frame structure. The results obtained in this study indicated the inability of short-segment SMA designs to provide adequate ductility to the lateral resistant systems. An alternative approach is introduced by using hybrid steel-SMA braces that are capable of controlling the residual drifts and providing the structure with adequate lateral stiffness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X ↗
2. Lopez W A · AISC Eng. J. · 2004 · 41 · 17710.62913/engj.v41i4.838 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000029610.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000296 ↗
4. McCormick J · 14th World Conf. of Earthquake Engineering · 2008
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(113)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(113) ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862) ↗
8. Aizawa S · Smart Mater. Struct · 1998 · 7 · 61710.1088/0964-1726/7/5/006 ↗
9. Youssef M A · 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conf on Earthquake Engineering · 2010
10. Kari A · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2011 · 20 · 1410.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125020 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.06.00610.1016/j.jcsr.2010.06.006 ↗
12. 10.1002/tal.114910.1002/tal.1149 ↗
13. 10.1002/tal.122510.1002/tal.1225 ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X970080060210.1177/1045389X9700800602 ↗
15. Fugazza D · 2003
16. FEMA 273 NEHRP · Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings · 1997
17. ASCE/ANSI Standard 41-06 · (Previously Published as FEMA 356) · 2006
18. Fahnestock L A · International Workshop on Steel and Concrete Composite Construction · 2003
19. Sabelli R · 2013
20. Prakash V · 1993