journal article·2014-04-01

Crack width monitoring of concrete structures based on smart film

Benniu Zhang, Shuliang Wang, Xingxing Li, Xu Zhang, Guang Yang, Minfeng Qiu

Smart Materials and Structures· Volume 23· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Due to its direct link to structural security, crack width is thought to be one of the most important parameters reflecting damage conditions of concrete structures. However, the width problem is difficult to solve with the existing structural health monitoring methods. In this paper, crack width monitoring by means of adhering enameled copper wires with different ultimate strains on the surface of structures is proposed, based on smart film crack monitoring put forward by the present authors. The basic idea of the proposed method is related to a proportional relationship between the crack width and ultimate strain of the broken wire. Namely, when a certain width of crack passes through the wire, some low ultimate strain wires will be broken and higher ultimate strain wires may stay non-broken until the crack extends to a larger scale. Detection of the copper wire condition as broken or non-broken may indicate the width of the structural crack. Thereafter, a multi-layered stress transfer model and specimen experiment are performed to quantify the relationship. A practical smart film is then redesigned with this idea and applied to Chongqing Jiangjin Yangtze River Bridge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00010-910.1016/S0267-7261(97)00010-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.02110.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.09.00410.1016/j.sna.2006.09.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.00210.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.07.00810.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.07.008 ↗
6. 10.1117/12.61244910.1117/12.612449 ↗
7. 10.1109/JLT.1985.107431510.1109/JLT.1985.1074315 ↗
8. 10.1117/12.51254610.1117/12.512546 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.02310.1016/j.sna.2006.08.023 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.11.01010.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.11.010 ↗
11. 10.1177/147592170404562510.1177/1475921704045625 ↗
12. 10.1109/TIM.2009.201570610.1109/TIM.2009.2015706 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.00810.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.014 ↗
15. 10.1177/147592171039580910.1177/1475921710395809 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.10610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.106 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X0606152110.1177/1045389X06061521 ↗
19. 10.1177/147592171037328810.1177/1475921710373288 ↗
20. 10.1155/2013/30365610.1155/2013/303656 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-110.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.01.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.01.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.02210.1016/j.cma.2005.04.022 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.07.05710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.07.057 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.11.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2012.11.008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.01.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2013.01.006 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-3-642-00173-410.1007/978-3-642-00173-4 ↗