Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics
Source abstract
Abstract
A piezoelectric based built-in diagnostic technique has been developed for monitoring fatigue crack growth in metallic structures. The technique uses diagnostic signals, generated from nearby piezoelectric actuators built into the structures, to detect crack growth. It consists of three major components: diagnostic signal generation, signal processing and damage interpretation. In diagnostic signal generation, appropriate ultrasonic guided Lamb waves were selected for actuators to maximize receiving sensor measurements. In signal processing, methods were developed to select an individual mode for damage detection and maximize signal to noise ratio in recorded sensor signals. Finally, in damage interpretation, a physics based damage index was developed relating sensor measurements to crack growth size. Fatigue tests were performed on laboratory coupons with a notch to verify the proposed technique. The damage index measured from built-in piezoceramics on the coupons showed a good correlation with the actual fatigue crack growth obtained from visual inspection. Furthermore, parametric studies were also performed to characterize the sensitivity of sensor/actuator location for the proposed technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Schmidt H-J Schmidt-Brandecker B · Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 2001 · pp 80
2. Boller C · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2001 · 10 · 43210.1088/0964-1726/10/3/302 ↗
3. Doebling S W Farrar C R Prime M B Shevitz D W · 1996
4. Imam I · J. Vib. Acoust. Stress Reliab. Des. · 1989 · 3 · 24110.1115/1.3269848 ↗
5. 10.1006/jsvi.2001.381610.1006/jsvi.2001.3816 ↗
6. Doyle J F · Exp. Mech. · 1995 · 27210.1007/BF02319668 ↗
7. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.298110.1006/jsvi.2000.2981 ↗
8. Giurgiutiu V · Proc. Ist European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 2002 · pp 433
9. Zagrai A N Giurgiutiu V · Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 2001 · pp 177
10. Peairs D M Park G Inman D J · Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 2001 · pp 430
11. Castanien K E · Proc. SPIE · 1996 · 2721 · 3810.1117/12.239153 ↗
12. Roh Y S Chang F-K · 1999
13. Wang C S Chang F-K · Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 1999 · pp 612
14. 10.1109/58.14317210.1109/58.143172 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00060-X10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00060-X ↗
16. Kessler S S · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2002 · 11 · 26910.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
17. Viktrov I A · Rayleigh and Lamb Waves: Physical Theory and Applications · 196710.1007/978-1-4899-5681-1 ↗
18. Qian S · Joint Time-Frequency Analysis-Methods and Applications · 1996
19. Pavlakovic B N Lowe M J S · 2000
20. Lowe M J S Pavlakovic B N Cawley P · Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring · 2001 · pp 880