journal article·2016-05-01

Optimized anisotropic magnetoelectric response of Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2/PVDF/Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2laminates for AC/DC magnetic field sensing

S Reis, M P Silva, N Castro, V Correia, J Gutierrez, A Lasheras, S Lanceros-Mendez, P Martins

Smart Materials and Structures· Volume 25· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Anisotropic magnetoelectric (ME) effect on a Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2/PVDF Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2laminate composite has been used for the development of a magnetic field sensor able to detect both magnitude and direction of AC and DC magnetic fields. \nAccuracy (99% for both AC and DC sensors), linearity (92% for the DC sensor and 99% for the AC sensor) and reproducibility (99% for both sensors) indicate the suitability of the sensor for applications. Further, the sensitivity of the Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2/PVDF/ Fe61.6Co16.4Si10.8B11.2 anisotropic magnetic sensor, 15 and 1400 mV.Oe-1 for DC and AC fields, respectively, are the highest reported in the literature for polymer-based ME materials . Such features allied to the flexibility, versatility, lightweight, low cost and low-temperature fabrication lead to the suitability of the developed sensor for magnetic sensor applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Caruso M · Sensors- … · 1998 · 15 · 34
2. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.07910.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.079 ↗
3. 10.1109/JSEN.2006.87449310.1109/JSEN.2006.874493 ↗
4. Luong V · Presented at the 2015 IEEE Int. Magnetics Conf., INTERMAG 2015 · 2015
5. Sander C · Presented at the Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) · 2015
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.12.01510.1016/j.sna.2014.12.015 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11018-015-0600-y10.1007/s11018-015-0600-y ↗
8. 10.3390/s9100778510.3390/s91007785 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.491394310.1063/1.4913943 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20120278010.1002/adfm.201202780 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.487691010.1063/1.4876910 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.5b0119610.1021/acsami.5b01196 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.040 ↗
15. 10.2174/187446480766614042900404010.2174/1874464807666140429004040 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.04.03310.1016/j.sna.2009.04.033 ↗
17. Boll R · Sensors, Magnetic Sensors · 2008
18. 10.1364/AO.54.00208510.1364/AO.54.002085 ↗
19. Liu T · Ieee Photonics Journal · 2014 · 6
20. 10.1063/1.355297010.1063/1.3552970 ↗
21. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.230971810.1109/JSEN.2014.2309718 ↗
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.960-961.69510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.960-961.695 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.205721110.1117/12.2057211 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.08.00410.1016/j.sna.2007.08.004 ↗
25. 10.1103/physrevb.68.13240810.1103/physrevb.68.132408 ↗
26. 10.1134/1.164670010.1134/1.1646700 ↗
27. 10.1134/1.194686610.1134/1.1946866 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.307375110.1063/1.3073751 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.362466110.1063/1.3624661 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.491922810.1063/1.4919228 ↗
31. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.235707310.1109/TMAG.2014.2357073 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.11.02610.1016/j.sna.2014.11.026 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.490769510.1063/1.4907695 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.486832610.1063/1.4868326 ↗
35. 10.9714/psac.2015.17.3.02810.9714/psac.2015.17.3.028 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11664-015-3632-910.1007/s11664-015-3632-9 ↗
37. 10.1166/jctn.2014.347110.1166/jctn.2014.3471 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.01710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.017 ↗
39. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.244302410.1109/TMAG.2015.2443024 ↗
40. 10.1098/rsta.2012.045510.1098/rsta.2012.0455 ↗
41. Soloviev I N · Presented at the Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp · 2012
42. 10.1109/TBME.2014.235734510.1109/TBME.2014.2357345 ↗