Programing Crystal Growth with DNA Tile Seeds
Source abstract
Abstract
Nucleation and crystal growth underpin the formation of ordered structures from disordered systems, yet spontaneous nucleation is inherently stochastic and difficult to control. Seeding can introduce preformed nuclei to guide assembly, which offers a strategy to regulate these processes. Here, we investigate seeded nucleation in the two‐dimensional assembly of trimeric macromolecules using programable DNA tiles as a model system. Introducing a single DNA tile as a nucleation seed enabled size‐ and shape‐controlled growth, yielding more homogeneous and reproducible nanoscale assemblies. At moderate seed concentrations, surface coverage increased threefold and crystal uniformity greatly improved. Insufficient seeding failed to impact nucleation, while excessive seeding led to uncontrolled nucleation and higher polydispersity. Across a range of monomer concentrations, seeded assemblies consistently exhibited enhanced coverage and reduced heterogeneity. For more flexible monomers, we designed a specialized seed that effectively regulated nucleation, overcoming challenges in network formation caused by interface flexibility. These results demonstrate how seeded nucleation can transform stochastic growth into predictable assembly, highlighting DNA nanotechnology as a powerful route to engineer highly ordered nanomaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Programmable Biomaterials Laboratory Institute of Materials Interfaculty Bioengineering Institute School of Engineering Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Kashchiev D. · 2000
2. Mullin J. W. · 2001
3. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0398410.1021/acs.iecr.1c03984 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0045610.1021/acs.cgd.7b00456 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.oprd.0c0015110.1021/acs.oprd.0c00151 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-981-15-9505-9_8410.1007/978-981-15-9505-9_84 ↗
7. 10.1038/nrm.2017.13210.1038/nrm.2017.132 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.05.00310.1016/j.ceb.2007.05.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.01710.1016/j.cell.2004.08.017 ↗
10. 10.1039/c0sm01219j10.1039/c0sm01219j ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.16600110.1103/PhysRevLett.128.166001 ↗
12. 10.1038/nature0239710.1038/nature02397 ↗
13. 10.2113/054005710.2113/0540057 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.493964110.1063/1.4939641 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c0140610.1021/acs.cgd.2c01406 ↗
16. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6810.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja054193810.1021/ja0541938 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41557-025-01741-y10.1038/s41557-025-01741-y ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.4c1181310.1021/acsami.4c11813 ↗
20. 10.1039/c0nr00628a10.1039/c0nr00628a ↗
21. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray‐Level Histograms10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
22. R.Haase G.Witz andM. L.Zoccoler “Voronoi‐Otsu‐Labeling Workflow ” Preprint at (2020).