High-throughput validation of phase formability and simulation accuracy of cantor alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
• Perform high-throughput in-situ XRD on co-sputtered FeNiMnCr HEA thin films. • Introduce a modified logistic function to calibrate DFT-predicted transformation temperatures. • Propose a quantitative confidence metric linking high-throughput experiments and computations • Enable systematic assessment of computational models to guide future experiments. High-throughput methods enable accelerated discovery of novel materials in complex systems such as high-entropy alloys, which exhibit intricate phase stability across vast compositional spaces. Computational approaches, including Density Functional Theory (DFT) and calculation of phase diagrams (CALPHAD), facilitate screening of phase formability as a function of composition and temperature. However, the integration of computational predictions with experimental validation remains challenging in high-throughput studies. In this work, we introduce a quantitative confidence metric to assess the agreement between predictions and experimental observations, providing a quantitative measure of the confidence of machine learning models trained on either DFT or CALPHAD input in accounting for experimental evidence. The experimental dataset was generated via high-throughput in-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction on compositionally varied FeNiMnCr alloy libraries, heated from room temperature to ∼1000 °C. Agreement between the observed and predicted phases was evaluated using either temperature-independent phase classification or a model that incorporates a temperature-dependent probability of phase formation. This integrated approach demonstrates where strong overall agreement exists between computation and experiment, while also identifying key discrepancies, particularly in FCC/BCC predictions at Mn-rich regions to inform future model refinement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Cantor · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2004 · 213 · 375
2. Yeh · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2004 · 6 · 29910.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
3. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 113 · 23010.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.007 ↗
4. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2015 · 640 · 21710.1016/j.msea.2015.05.097 ↗
5. Parkin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2022 · 56510.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153733 ↗
6. Miracle · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 122 · 44810.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 ↗
7. Yu · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 29 · 268910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.246 ↗
8. Qiu · NPJ Mater. Degrad. · 2017 · 1 · 1510.1038/s41529-017-0009-y ↗
9. Liu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2024 · 1002
10. Kube · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 188 · 4010.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.059 ↗
11. Cheng · Adv Mater. · 2024
12. Kattner · Tecnol. Em. Metal Mater. Min. · 2016 · 13 · 310.4322/2176-1523.1059 ↗
13. Conway · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2022 · 83010.1016/j.msea.2021.142297 ↗
14. Li · J. Mater. Chem. A. · 2024 · 12
15. Manzoor · Front Mater. · 2021 · 810.3389/fmats.2021.673574 ↗
16. Zhou · Acta Mater. · 2022 · 224
17. Rosen · Npj Comput. Mater. · 2022 · 8 · 11210.1038/s41524-022-00796-6 ↗
18. Ghassemali · Front Mater. · 2022 · 9 · 202210.3389/fmats.2022.889771 ↗
19. Curtarolo · Calphad · 2005 · 29 · 16310.1016/j.calphad.2005.01.002 ↗
20. Fedorov · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 25510.1016/j.actamat.2023.119047 ↗
21. Moorehead · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2021 · 54710.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152782 ↗
22. Ludwig · NPJ Comput. Mater. · 2019 · 5 · 7010.1038/s41524-019-0205-0 ↗
23. Ren, F., et al., Sci. Adv. 4 (4), eaaq1566. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1566.10.1126/sciadv.aaq1566 ↗
24. Bunn · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 2610.1088/0957-4484/26/27/274003 ↗
25. Andreoli · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 22110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117416 ↗
26. Dey · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. · 2017 · 3510.1116/1.4979709 ↗
27. Cheng · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2025 · 15110.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101429 ↗
28. Leontowich · Synchrotron. Radiat. · 2021 · 28 · 96110.1107/S1600577521002496 ↗
29. Cheng · Mater. Today Nano. · 2023 · 24
30. Braeckman · J. Alloys Compd. · 2015 · 646 · 81010.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.097 ↗
31. Fang · J. Alloys. Compd. · 2020 · 82010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153388 ↗
32. Mallia · Plasma Process. Polym. · 2007 · 4 · S11310.1002/ppap.200730501 ↗
33. Yang · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 132 · 23310.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.021 ↗
34. Yang · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 192 · 1110.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.039 ↗
35. Dong · Intermetallics · 2014 · 52 · 10510.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.001 ↗
36. Chen · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 285610.1038/s41467-023-38423-7 ↗
37. Li · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2020 · 4
38. Li · Phys. Rev. B. · 2022 · 106
39. Chen · Calphad · 2002 · 26 · 17510.1016/S0364-5916(02)00034-2 ↗
40. Cramer · Logit. Models Econ. Other. Fields. · 2003 · 2003 · 1
41. Logistic regression model optimization and case analysis
42. MATLAB, sgolayfilt.
43. Background correction