Current‐Induced Concentration Polarization of Nanoporous Media: Role of Electroosmosis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Current‐induced concentration polarization of nanoporous media is explored theoretically by using approach of local thermodynamic equilibrium within nanopore cross‐sections. The problem is solved in quadratures in terms of irreversible thermodynamics. The phenomenological coefficients are further specified by using capillary space‐charge model for straight slit‐like and cylindrical capillaries. This analysis reveals several novel features of current‐induced concentration polarization related to the (electro)osmotic volume transfer. It confirms the previous finding that volume transfer can suppress the limiting‐current phenomena but obtains more accurate criteria for this. In particular, it shows that the critical nanopore size and/or electrolyte concentration depend on the nanoporous‐medium relative thickness. Under no‐limiting‐current conditions, the salt concentration at the interface between nanoporous medium and unstirred layer is a nonmonotone function of current density. This gives rise to unconventional current–voltage characteristics. Moreover, under certain conditions, the analysis predicts the existence of ranges of “prohibited” current densities where the problem does not have 1D stationary solution, which could give rise to a kind of “phase separation” with coexisting zones of different local current densities corresponding to the same voltage. Besides the advanced understanding of current‐induced concentration polarization of nanoporous media, this analysis provides guidelines for the optimization of sample preconcentration systems in (bio)chemical microanalysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ICREA pg. L. Companys 23 08010 Barcelona Spain
Department of Chemical Engineering Polytechnic University of Catalonia av. Diagonal 647 08028 Barcelona Spain
Institute of Bio‐Colloid Chemistry National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Vernadskiy ave.42 03142 Kyiv Ukraine
Funding
Seventh Framework Programme
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cis.2010.08.00110.1016/j.cis.2010.08.001 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.128306jes10.1149/2.128306jes ↗
3. 10.1021/jp071884c10.1021/jp071884c ↗
4. 10.1007/s00216-008-2545-310.1007/s00216-008-2545-3 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp111377h10.1021/jp111377h ↗
6. 10.1021/nn900039f10.1021/nn900039f ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/31/31570710.1088/0957-4484/19/31/315707 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.273560810.1063/1.2735608 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.05610.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.056 ↗
10. 10.1039/c3cp53105h10.1039/c3cp53105h ↗
11. 10.1039/C3CP51712H10.1039/C3CP51712H ↗
12. 10.1063/1.362718110.1063/1.3627181 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp208309g10.1021/jp208309g ↗
14. 10.1021/la203837q10.1021/la203837q ↗
15. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/22/03210.1088/0022-3727/40/22/032 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp907618910.1021/jp9076189 ↗
17. 10.1039/c1nr10434a10.1039/c1nr10434a ↗
18. 10.1039/B822554K10.1039/B822554K ↗
19. 10.1039/C5CP07203D10.1039/C5CP07203D ↗
20. 10.1021/nl051646y10.1021/nl051646y ↗
21. 10.1039/B820556F10.1039/B820556F ↗
22. 10.1021/nl062806o10.1021/nl062806o ↗
23. 10.1021/jp911773m10.1021/jp911773m ↗
24. 10.1016/j.aca.2009.07.04410.1016/j.aca.2009.07.044 ↗
25. 10.1021/la702955k10.1021/la702955k ↗
26. 10.1021/nl800949k10.1021/nl800949k ↗
27. 10.1021/nn800306u10.1021/nn800306u ↗
28. 10.1021/ja909335r10.1021/ja909335r ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0093910.1021/acsnano.6b00939 ↗
30. 10.1021/la050499g10.1021/la050499g ↗
31. 10.1007/s10404-011-0902-610.1007/s10404-011-0902-6 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.05630910.1103/PhysRevE.86.056309 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.360569310.1063/1.3605693 ↗
34. 10.1039/df956210004610.1039/df9562100046 ↗
35. 10.1039/b800549d10.1039/b800549d ↗
36. 10.1021/ac701992710.1021/ac7019927 ↗
37. 10.1021/ac801790710.1021/ac8017907 ↗
38. 10.1021/la803317p10.1021/la803317p ↗
39. 10.1021/la803318e10.1021/la803318e ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.11830110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.118301 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.06150410.1103/PhysRevE.84.061504 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.496230210.1063/1.4962302 ↗
43. 10.1021/la201354s10.1021/la201354s ↗
44. 10.1039/b808179d10.1039/b808179d ↗
45. 10.1021/ac802209e10.1021/ac802209e ↗
46. 10.1016/0001-8686(95)00246-M10.1016/0001-8686(95)00246-M ↗
47. In principle any other externally applied hydrostatic‐pressure difference can also be used. One could also consider the mode of electroosmotic pressure where volume flow is equal to zero.
48. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.02910.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.029 ↗
49. In the case of cylindrical nanopores within the range ofBwhere the inflection‐point concentration is bivalued we used its larger value for the calculation of critical dimensionless reciprocal screening length.
50. Remember that the “prohibited” current densities occur when limiting currents are possible with thin nanoblocks but do not take place with sufficiently thick ones. This can happen only provided that the two critical concentrations are different.
51. 10.1002/smll.20110224010.1002/smll.201102240 ↗
52. 10.1021/ac050834610.1021/ac0508346 ↗
53. 10.1039/b717900f10.1039/b717900f ↗
54. 10.1007/s10544-015-9940-210.1007/s10544-015-9940-2 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.494203710.1063/1.4942037 ↗
56. 10.1039/c2lc21238b10.1039/c2lc21238b ↗