journal article·2012-12-07Open access

A New Approach to Assess Gold Nanoparticle Uptake by Mammalian Cells: Combining Optical Dark‐Field and Transmission Electron Microscopy

Christina Rosman, Sebastien Pierrat, Andreas Henkel, Marco Tarantola, David Schneider, Eva Sunnick, Andreas Janshoff, Carsten Sönnichsen

Small· Volume 8· Issue 23

Abstract

Abstract Toxicological effects of nanoparticles are associated with their internalization into cells. Hence, there is a strong need for techniques revealing the interaction between particles and cells as well as quantifying the uptake at the same time. For that reason, herein optical dark‐field microscopy is used in conjunction with transmission electron microscopy to investigate the uptake of gold nanoparticles into epithelial cells with respect to shape, stabilizing agent, and surface charge. The number of internalized particles is strongly dependent on the stabilizing agent, but not on the particle shape. A test of metabolic activity shows no direct correlation with the number of internalized particles. Therefore, particle properties besides coating and shape are suspected to contribute to the observed toxicity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20070318310.1002/adma.200703183 ↗
2. 10.1038/8668410.1038/86684 ↗
3. 10.1002/lpor.20081001110.1002/lpor.200810011 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.219502410.1063/1.2195024 ↗
5. 10.1021/ar800035u10.1021/ar800035u ↗
6. 10.1088/0957-4484/14/7/20110.1088/0957-4484/14/7/201 ↗
7. 10.1039/b712170a10.1039/b712170a ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.01610.1016/j.addr.2008.03.016 ↗
9. 10.1021/ar800150g10.1021/ar800150g ↗
10. Kingson J. A. · The New York Times · 2010
11. Paracelsus T. · 2003 · 1538
12. 10.1002/smll.20070059510.1002/smll.200700595 ↗
13. 10.1039/C0CS00018C10.1039/C0CS00018C ↗
14. 10.1039/b806051g10.1039/b806051g ↗
15. 10.1021/bc800206r10.1021/bc800206r ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20090012610.1002/smll.200900126 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20080154610.1002/smll.200801546 ↗
18. 10.1021/nl052396o10.1021/nl052396o ↗
19. 10.1021/nl803487r10.1021/nl803487r ↗
20. 10.1021/ac061578f10.1021/ac061578f ↗
21. 10.1016/j.taap.2008.06.00910.1016/j.taap.2008.06.009 ↗
22. 10.1021/la062642r10.1021/la062642r ↗
23. 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.11.00110.1016/j.aanat.2008.11.001 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20100052810.1002/smll.201000528 ↗
25. 10.3109/17435390.2010.52884710.3109/17435390.2010.528847 ↗
26. 10.1186/1477-3155-8-3310.1186/1477-3155-8-33 ↗
27. 10.1002/smll.20090115810.1002/smll.200901158 ↗
28. 10.1517/17425247.5.4.37110.1517/17425247.5.4.371 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20070021710.1002/smll.200700217 ↗
30. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/14/14510110.1088/0957-4484/21/14/145101 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00249005018010.1007/s002490050180 ↗
32. Weiers R. M. · 2004
33. 10.1021/bm700535p10.1021/bm700535p ↗
34. 10.1021/nn700149r10.1021/nn700149r ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20100181610.1002/smll.201001816 ↗
36. 10.1021/nl062131p10.1021/nl062131p ↗
37. 10.1093/toxsci/kfl16510.1093/toxsci/kfl165 ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2011.5810.1038/nnano.2011.58 ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20110142210.1002/smll.201101422 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.06.01710.1016/j.jconrel.2006.06.017 ↗
41. 10.1021/nn800721j10.1021/nn800721j ↗
42. 10.1021/cm020732l10.1021/cm020732l ↗
43. 10.1063/1.220321210.1063/1.2203212 ↗
44. Corrigendum:2008 103 119901.10.1063/1.2936980 ↗
45. Freshney R. I. · 2000
46. 10.1099/vir.0.83380-010.1099/vir.0.83380-0 ↗
47. Hayat M. A. · 2000
48. Hanaichi T. · J. Electron Microsc. · 1986 · 35 · 304