Tribological and Microstructure Behavior of Quicklime (CaO) Filled Silicon Bronze Alloy for Bearing Material
Source abstract
Abstract
CaO filled silicon bronze (SiBr) alloy composites have been fabricated by a high temperature vacuum casting technique at five different weight percentages (0 wt%, 2.5 wt%, 5 wt%, 7.5 wt% and 10 wt% of CaO). The void contents, hardness and wear behavior of the CaO filled SiBr alloy composites were studied showing that the addition of particulates in base alloy reduces the void contents from 0.827 % to 0.504 % for 0 wt% to 7.5 wt% of CaO respectively. Similarly, the hardness of CaO filled SiBr alloy composites initially increases from 119.25 Hv to 140.8 Hv on addition of 7.5 % CaO but on further increase in filler content (10 wt%) the hardness decreases to 114.5 HV respectively. The specific wear rate of composite materials for applied load and sliding velocity factors showed surpassing behavior compared to unfilled alloy composites. To get the optimum response of wear behavior of composite materials the Taguchi L25 orthogonal array was applied and the result shows the higher S/N ratio i.e. 106.33 dB. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) result shows that the filler content plays a major effect compared to other factors. The particulate filled composites were examined through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) in order to understand the wear mechanism and morphology behavior of the composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Metallurgy and Material Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Tevfik K, Kara L (2014) Wear 309:21–2810.1016/j.wear.2013.10.003 ↗
2. Xia L, Zeng JB, XuJ J (2009) Mater Charact 60:363–36910.1016/j.matchar.2008.10.008 ↗
3. Hiraia Y, Satoa T, Fukuia T, Yamadab K, Tanizawab K, Usami H (2013) Procedia Engineering 68:37–4210.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.144 ↗
4. Tomovic R (2012) Int J Mech Sci 60:23–3310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.04.002 ↗
5. Shaha DS, Patel VN (2014) Procedia Technology 14:447–45610.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.057 ↗
6. Jiang H, Chen J, Dong G, Liu T, Chen G (2015) Mech Syst Signal Process 52-53:338–35910.1016/j.ymssp.2014.07.019 ↗
7. Ahmadi AM, Petersen D, Howard C (2015) Mech Syst Signal Process 52-53:309–32610.1016/j.ymssp.2014.06.006 ↗
8. Li H, Xu F, Liu H, Zhang X (2015) Measurement 65:1–1010.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.032 ↗
9. Mishra SK, Biswas S (2014) SatapathyA. Mater Des 55:958–96510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.069 ↗
10. Seah KHW, Tucci A, Sharma SC, Girish BM, Kamath R (1995) Mater Des 16(6):315–37810.1016/0261-3069(96)00005-2 ↗
11. Ceschini L, Bosi C, Casagrande A, Garagnani GL (2001) Wear 251:1377–138510.1016/S0043-1648(01)00782-7 ↗
12. Prabua SS, Prathiba S, Venkatesan N, Sharma A, Ahmed S, Shah YA (2014) In “12th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management” GCMM - 2014. Procedia Engineering 97:2110–211810.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.454 ↗
13. Kiran TS, Prasanna KM, Basavarajappa S, Viswanatha BM (2014) Mater Des 63:294–30410.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.007 ↗
14. Agarwal BD, Broutman LJ (1990) Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
15. Kumar SS, Devaiah M, SeshuBai V, Rajasekharan T (2012) Ceramic International 38:1139–114710.1016/j.ceramint.2011.08.042 ↗
16. Siddhartha V, Patnaik A, Bhatt AD (2011) Mater Des 32:615–62710.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.011 ↗
17. Espinosa L, Borrell A, Salvador MD, Gutiérrez-González CF (2013) Wear 307(1-2):60–6710.1016/j.wear.2013.08.003 ↗
18. Hayrettin A, Tolga K, Ercan C, Huseyin C (2006) Tribol Int 39:213–22010.1016/j.triboint.2005.01.029 ↗
19. Aqida SN, Ghazali MI, Hashim J (2004) Jurnal Teknologi 40(A):17–32
20. Balasubramanian I, Maheswaran R (2015) Mater Des 65:511–52010.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.067 ↗
21. Sathiskumar R, Murugan N, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ (2013) Mater Charact 84:16–2710.1016/j.matchar.2013.07.001 ↗
22. Shabani M, Paydar MH, Zamiri R, Goodarzi M, Moshksar MM (2015) J Mater Res Technol 4(2):109–22810.1016/j.jmrt.2014.11.004 ↗
23. Vencla A, Rajkovic V, Zivic F, Mitrovic S, Alagi IC, Jovanovic MT (2013). Applied Surface Science 280:646–65410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.039 ↗
24. Pei-peng JIN, Geng CHEN, Li HAN, Jin-hui WANG (2014) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24:49–5710.1016/S1003-6326(14)63027-2 ↗
25. Zhang L, He XB, Qu XH, Duan BH, Lu X, Qin ML (2008) Wear 265:1848–185610.1016/j.wear.2008.04.029 ↗
26. Chen R, Iwabuchi A, Shimizu T, Shin HS, Mifune H (1997) Wear 213:175–18410.1016/S0043-1648(97)00123-3 ↗
27. Dinaharan I, Murugan N, Parameswaran S (2011) Mater Sci Eng A528:5733–574010.1016/j.msea.2011.04.033 ↗
28. Baskaran S, Anandakrishnan V, Duraiselvam Muthukannan (2014). Mater Des 60:184–19210.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.074 ↗
29. Qing-ju QI (2006) Trans Nonferrous Met SOCC China 161:135–1140
30. Onat A (2010) J Alloys Compd 489:119–12410.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.027 ↗
31. Winzer J, Weiler L, Pouquet J, Rodel J (2011) Wear 271:2845–285110.1016/j.wear.2011.05.042 ↗
32. Lin N, Xie F, Yang H, Tian W, Wang H, Tang B (2012) Appl Surf Sci 258(11):4960–497010.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.128 ↗
33. Kumar BA, Murugan N, Dinharan I (2014) Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24:2785–279510.1016/S1003-6326(14)63410-5 ↗
34. Baskaran S, Anandakrishnan V, Duraiselvam M (2014) Mater Des 60:184–19210.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.074 ↗
35. Chung KH (2014) Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(10):2219–223010.1007/s12541-014-0584-6 ↗
36. Mondal AK, Kumar S (2009) Wear 267:458–46610.1016/j.wear.2008.12.036 ↗