Chemical Functionalities of 3-aminopropyltriethoxy-silane for Surface Modification of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) is one of the most important silicon compounds in chemistry for the synthesis of materials. It has extensively been used as a silanization agent for the chemical modification of metal oxide nanoparticle (MONP) surfaces. The introduction of amine (NH2) enhances their dispersibility and anti-bacterial property. The APTES-MONPs have various direct applications in electrochemical sensors, catalysts and Pickering emulsions. In this review article, exemplary APTES modifications of MONPs for unique biomedical, industrial and scientific applications are highlighted. APTES modification provides a linkage for numerous organic, inorganic, or biochemical attachments that are essential to drug delivery, contaminants removal, catalyst immobilization, and medical imaging.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu W-T(2006) Nanoparticles and their biological and environmental applications. J Biosci Bioeng 102:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.102.110.1263/jbb.102.1 ↗
2. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 14:1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1109-910.1007/s11051-012-1109-9 ↗
3. Oskam G (2006) Metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and application. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 37:161–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-005-6621-210.1007/s10971-005-6621-2 ↗
4. Keller AA, Adeleye AS, Conway JR et al (2017) Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials. NanoImpact 7:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.05.00310.1016/j.impact.2017.05.003 ↗
5. Akhter SMH, Mohammad F, Ahmad S (2019) Terminalia belerica mediated green synthesis of nanoparticles of copper, iron and zinc metal oxides as the alternate antibacterial agents against some common pathogens. BioNanoScience 9:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-019-0601-410.1007/s12668-019-0601-4 ↗
6. Azam A, Ahmed, Oves et al (2012) Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int J Nanomed 6003. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S3534710.2147/IJN.S35347 ↗
7. Ciucă AG, Grecu CI, Rotărescu P et al (2017) Nanostructures for drug delivery: pharmacokinetic and toxicological aspects. In: Nanostructures for Drug Delivery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 941–95710.1016/B978-0-323-46143-6.00030-0 ↗
8. Chan M-H, Lin H-M(2015) Preparation and identification of multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo dual-mode imaging, theranostics, and targeted tracking. Biomaterials 46:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.034 ↗
9. Zahedi SS, Larki A, Saghanezhad SJ, Nikpour Y (2021) 1,4-Diazabicyclo [2.2.2] Octane Functionalized Mesoporous Silica SBA-15 (SBA-15@DABCO): a Novel Highly Selective Adsorbent for Selective Separation/Preconcentration of Cr(VI) from Environmental Water Samples. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00903-610.1007/s12633-020-00903-6 ↗
10. Vares G, Jallet V, Matsumoto Y et al (2020) Functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for innovative boron-neutron capture therapy of resistant cancers. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 27:102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2020.10219510.1016/j.nano.2020.102195 ↗
11. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26:3995–4021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 ↗
12. Sperling RA, Parak WJ (2010) Surface modification, functionalization and bioconjugation of colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Philos Trans R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 368:1333–1383. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.027310.1098/rsta.2009.0273 ↗
13. Weingart J, Vabbilisetty P, Sun X-L(2013) Membrane mimetic surface functionalization of nanoparticles: Methods and applications. Adv Coll Interface Sci 197–198:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.04.00310.1016/j.cis.2013.04.003 ↗
14. Thiruppathi R, Mishra S, Ganapathy M et al (2017) Nanoparticle functionalization and its potentials for molecular imaging. Adv Sci 4:1600279. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20160027910.1002/advs.201600279 ↗
15. Zang P, Liang Y, Hu WW (2015) Improved Hydrolytic Stability and Repeatability: pH sensing with APTES-coated silicon nanowire bio-FETs. IEEE Nanatechnol Mag 9:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNANO.2015.247269610.1109/MNANO.2015.2472696 ↗
16. Villa S, Riani P, Locardi F, Canepa F (2016) Functionalization of Fe3O4 NPs by silanization: use of amine (APTES) and Thiol (MPTMS) Silanes and their physical characterization. Materials 9:826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma910082610.3390/ma9100826 ↗
17. Zhang L, Lei Q, Luo J et al (2019) Natural halloysites-based janus platelet surfactants for the formation of pickering emulsion and enhanced oil recovery. Sci Rep 9:163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36352-w10.1038/s41598-018-36352-w ↗
18. Lopez-Barbosa N, Osma JF (2017) Nanocomposites fabrication by self-assembly method to modify macroscopic properties. J Phys: Conf Ser 786:012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/786/1/01200310.1088/1742-6596/786/1/012003 ↗
19. Xiao Z, Xu J, Niu Y et al (2019) Effects of surface functional groups on the adhesion of SiO2 Nanospheres to bio-based materials. Nanomaterials 9:1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano910141110.3390/nano9101411 ↗
20. Croissant JG, Fatieiev Y, Almalik A, Khashab NM (2018) Mesoporous silica and organosilica nanoparticles: physical chemistry, biosafety, delivery strategies, and biomedical applications. Adv Healthcare Mater 7:1700831. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20170083110.1002/adhm.201700831 ↗
21. Gomes MC, Cunha Â, Trindade T, Tomé JPC (2016) The role of surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for bioimaging. J Innov Opt Health Sci 09:1630005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179354581630005610.1142/S1793545816300056 ↗
22. Abdelkhaliq A, van der Zande M, Punt A et al (2018) Impact of nanoparticle surface functionalization on the protein corona and cellular adhesion, uptake and transport. J Nanobiotechnol 16:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0394-610.1186/s12951-018-0394-6 ↗
23. Pelaz B, del Pino P, Maffre P et al (2015) Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake. ACS Nano 9:6996–7008. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0132610.1021/acsnano.5b01326 ↗
24. Neouze M-A, Schubert U (2008) Surface modification and functionalization of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles by organic ligands. Monatshefte für Chemie - Chem Mon 139:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-007-0775-210.1007/s00706-007-0775-2 ↗
25. Heiney PA, Grüneberg K, Fang J et al (2000) Structure and growth of chromophore-functionalized (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane self-assembled on silicon. Langmuir 16. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990557w10.1021/la990557w ↗
26. Grasset F, Saito N, Li D et al (2003) Surface modification of zinc oxide nanoparticles by aminopropyltriethoxysilane. J Alloy Compd 360:298–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00371-210.1016/S0925-8388(03)00371-2 ↗
27. Jung H-S, Moon D-S, Lee J-K(2012) Quantitative analysis and efficient surface modification of silica nanoparticles. J Nanomater 2012:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/59347110.1155/2012/593471 ↗
28. Shafqat SS, Khan AA, Zafar MN et al (2019) Development of amino-functionalized silica nanoparticles for efficient and rapid removal of COD from pre-treated palm oil effluent. J Mater Res Technol 8:385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.03.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.03.002 ↗
29. Aditya A, Chattopadhyay S, Gupta N et al (2019) ZnO nanoparticles modified with an amphipathic peptide show improved photoprotection in skin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0843110.1021/acsami.8b08431 ↗
30. Rai VR, Agarwal S (2011) Mechanism of self-catalytic atomic layer deposition of silicon dioxide using 3-aminopropyl Triethoxysilane, water, and ozone. Chem Mater 23:2312–2316. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm103052t10.1021/cm103052t ↗
31. Liu Y, Li Y, Li X-M, He T (2013) Kinetics of (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxylsilane (APTES) silanization of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 29:15275–15282. https://doi.org/10.1021/la403269u10.1021/la403269u ↗
32. Naguib HM, Ahmed MA, Abo-Shanab ZL (2018) Silane coupling agent for enhanced epoxy-iron oxide nanocomposite. J Mater Res Technol 7:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.03.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2017.03.002 ↗
33. Vandenberg ET, Bertilsson L, Liedberg B et al (1991) Structure of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane on silicon oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 147:103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(91)90139-Y10.1016/0021-9797(91)90139-Y ↗
34. Bruce IJ, Sen T (2005) Surface modification of magnetic nanoparticles with Alkoxysilanes and their application in magnetic Bioseparations. Langmuir 21:7029–7035. https://doi.org/10.1021/la050553t10.1021/la050553t ↗
35. Bauer F, Czihal S, Bertmer M et al (2017)Water-based functionalization of mesoporous siliceous materials, Part 1: Morphology and stability of grafted 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 250:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.04610.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.046 ↗
36. Meroni D, lo Presti L, di Liberto G et al (2017) A close look at the structure of the TiO2-APTES interface in hybrid nanomaterials and its degradation pathway: an experimental and theoretical study. J Phys Chem C 121:430–440. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1072010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10720 ↗
37. Pasternack RM, Rivillon Amy S, Chabal YJ (2008) Attachment of 3-(Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane on silicon oxide surfaces: dependence on solution temperature. Langmuir 24:12963–12971. https://doi.org/10.1021/la802482710.1021/la8024827 ↗
38. Saravanan P, Jayamoorthy K, Ananda Kumar S (2015)Switch-On fluorescence and photo-induced electron transfer of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane to ZnO: Dual applications in sensors and antibacterial activity. Sens Actuators B 221:784–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.06910.1016/j.snb.2015.05.069 ↗
39. Singh M, Sviridenkova N, Timur N et al (2016) Synthesis and characterization of stable iron oxide nanoparticle with amino covalent binding on the surface for biomedical application. J Cluster Sci 27:1383–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-016-1007-x10.1007/s10876-016-1007-x ↗
40. Wang G, Ma Y, Tong Y, Dong X (2016) Synthesis, characterization and magnetorheological study of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Smart Mater Struct 25:035028. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/3/03502810.1088/0964-1726/25/3/035028 ↗
41. Li Y, Chen H, Wu J et al (2018) Preparation and characterization of APTES modified magnetic MMT capable of using as anisotropic nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 447:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.23010.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.230 ↗
42. Caputo F, Mameli M, Sienkiewicz A et al (2017) A novel synthetic approach of cerium oxide nanoparticles with improved biomedical activity. Sci Rep 7:4636. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04098-610.1038/s41598-017-04098-6 ↗
43. Baghdadi YN, Youssef L, Bouhadir K et al (2020) The effects of modified zinc oxide nanoparticles on the mechanical/thermal properties of epoxy resin. J Appl Polym Sci 137:49330. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4933010.1002/app.49330 ↗
44. Liu Z-Y, Shen C-L, Lou Q et al (2020) Efficient chemiluminescent ZnO nanoparticles for cellular imaging. J Lumin 221:117111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.11711110.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117111 ↗
45. Dalod ARM, Grendal OG, Skjærvø SL et al (2017) Controlling oriented attachment and in situ functionalization of TiO2 nanoparticles during hydrothermal synthesis with APTES. J Phys Chem C 121:11897–11906. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0260410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02604 ↗
46. Favaro M, Abdi F, Crumlin E et al (2019) Interface science using ambient pressure hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Surfaces 2:78–99. https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces201000810.3390/surfaces2010008 ↗
47. Yang J, Liao M, Hong G et al (2020) Effect of APTES- or MPTS-conditioned nanozirconia fillers on mechanical properties of bis-GMA-based resin composites. ACS Omega 5:32540–32550. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c0476210.1021/acsomega.0c04762 ↗
48. Itzhaik Alkotzer Y, Grzegorzewski F, Belausov E et al (2019)In situ interfacial surface modification of hydrophilic silica nanoparticles by two organosilanes leading to stable Pickering emulsions. RSC Adv 9:39611–39621. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA07597F10.1039/C9RA07597F ↗
49. Ren G, Wang M, Wang L et al (2018) Dynamic covalent silica nanoparticles for pH-switchable pickering emulsions. Langmuir 34:5798–5806. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0075710.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00757 ↗
50. Ukaji E, Furusawa T, Sato M, Suzuki N (2007) The effect of surface modification with silane coupling agent on suppressing the photo-catalytic activity of fine TiO2 particles as inorganic UV filter. Appl Surf Sci 254:563–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.06110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.061 ↗
51. Cheng F, Sajedin SM, Kelly SM et al (2014)UV-stable paper coated with APTES-modified P25 TiO2 nanoparticles. Carbohyd Polym 114:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.07610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.076 ↗
52. Senatova SI, Mandal AR, Senatov FS et al (2015) Optical properties of stabilized ZnO nanoparticles, perspective for UV-protection in sunscreens. Curr Nanosci 11:354–359. https://doi.org/10.2174/157341371066614111922134510.2174/1573413710666141119221345 ↗
53. Bai Y, Li Z, Cheng B et al (2017) Higher UV-shielding ability and lower photocatalytic activity of TiO2@SiO2/APTES and its excellent performance in enhancing the photostability of poly(p-phenylene sulfide). RSC Adv 7:21758–21767. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA28098F10.1039/C6RA28098F ↗
54. Samantaray CB, Hastings JeffreyT (2011) Deep UV patterning of 3-amino-propyl-triethoxy-silaneself-assembled molecular layers on alumina. J Vac Sci Technol B 29:041603. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.359743710.1116/1.3597437 ↗
55. Saravanan P, Jayamoorthy K, Anandakumar S (2016) Fluorescence quenching of APTES by Fe2O3 nanoparticles – Sensor and antibacterial applications. J Lumin 178:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.05.03110.1016/j.jlumin.2016.05.031 ↗
56. Baek Y-W, An Y-J(2011) Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb2O3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci Total Environ 409:1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.01410.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.014 ↗
57. Esparza-González SC, Sánchez-Valdés S, Ramírez-Barrón SN et al (2016) Effects of different surface modifying agents on the cytotoxic and antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Toxicol In Vitro 37:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.09.02010.1016/j.tiv.2016.09.020 ↗
58. Klaysri R, Tubchareon T, Praserthdam P (2017)One-step synthesis of amine-functionalized TiO2 surface for photocatalytic decolorization under visible light irradiation. J Ind Eng Chem 45:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.02710.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.027 ↗
59. Rokicka-Konieczna P, Wanag A, Sienkiewicz A et al (2020) Antibacterial effect of TiO2 nanoparticles modified with APTES. Catal Commun 134:105862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2019.10586210.1016/j.catcom.2019.105862 ↗
60. Ranmadugala D, Ebrahiminezhad A, Manley-Harris M et al (2017) The effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on Bacillus subtilis biofilm, growth and viability. Process Biochem 62:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.07.00310.1016/j.procbio.2017.07.003 ↗
61. Ranmadugala D, Ebrahiminezhad A, Manley-Harris M et al (2017) Impact of 3–Aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated iron oxide nanoparticles on menaquinone-7 production using B. subtilis. Nanomaterials 7:350. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano711035010.3390/nano7110350 ↗
62. El-Naggar ME, Hassabo AG, Mohamed AL, Shaheen TI (2017) Surface modification of SiO2 coated ZnO nanoparticles for multifunctional cotton fabrics. J Colloid Interface Sci 498:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.08010.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.080 ↗
63. Ognjanović M, Stanković V, Knežević S et al (2020) TiO2/APTES cross-linked to carboxylic graphene based impedimetric glucose biosensor. Microchem J 158:105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.10515010.1016/j.microc.2020.105150 ↗
64. Dadkhah S, Ziaei E, Mehdinia A et al (2016) A glassy carbon electrode modified with amino-functionalized graphene oxide and molecularly imprinted polymer for electrochemical sensing of bisphenol A. Microchim Acta 183:1933–1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-1824-510.1007/s00604-016-1824-5 ↗
65. Khan MZH, Liu X, Zhu J et al (2018) Electrochemical detection of tyramine with ITO/APTES/ErGO electrode and its application in real sample analysis. Biosensors Bioelectronics 108:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.04210.1016/j.bios.2018.02.042 ↗
66. Zor E, Hatay Patir I, Bingol H, Ersoz M (2013) An electrochemical biosensor based on human serum albumin/grapheneoxide/3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane modified ITO electrode for the enantioselective discrimination of d- and l-tryptophan. Biosensors Bioelectronics 42:321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.10.06810.1016/j.bios.2012.10.068 ↗
67. Wang H, Su Y, Kim H et al (2015) A highly efficient ZrO2 nanoparticle based electrochemical sensor for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides. Chin J Chem 33:1135–1139. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.20150046010.1002/cjoc.201500460 ↗
68. Erogul S, Bas SZ, Ozmen M, Yildiz S (2015) A new electrochemical sensor based on Fe3O4 functionalized graphene oxide-gold nanoparticle composite film for simultaneous determination of catechol and hydroquinone. Electrochim Acta 186:302–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.17410.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.174 ↗
69. Zhang Y, Gong SWY, Jin L et al (2009) Magnetic nanocomposites of Fe3O4/SiO2-FITC with pH-dependent fluorescence emission. Chin Chem Lett 20:969–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2009.03.03810.1016/j.cclet.2009.03.038 ↗
70. Ebrahiminezhad A, Ghasemi Y, Rasoul-Amini S et al (2013) Preparation of novel magnetic fluorescent nanoparticles using amino acids. Colloids Surf B 102:534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.08.04610.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.08.046 ↗
71. Baumgärtel T, von Borczyskowski C, Graaf H (2013) Selective surface modification of lithographic silicon oxide nanostructures by organofunctional silanes. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 4:218–226. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.4.2210.3762/bjnano.4.22 ↗
72. Luong TT, Knoppe S, Bloemen M et al (2016) Magnetothermal release of payload from iron oxide/silica drug delivery agents. J Magn Magn Mater 416:194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.08110.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.081 ↗
73. Eghbali P, Fattahi H, Laurent S et al (2016)Fluorophore-tagged superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as bimodal contrast agents for MR/optical imaging. J Iran Chem Soc 13:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-015-0715-810.1007/s13738-015-0715-8 ↗
74. Saravanan P, Duraibabu D, Jayamoorthy K et al (2018) Twin applications of tetra-functional epoxy monomers for anticorrosion and antifouling studies. Silicon 10:555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9489-610.1007/s12633-016-9489-6 ↗
75. Dhanapal D, Muthukaruppan A, Srinivasan AK (2018) Tetraglycidyl epoxy reinforced with surface functionalized mullite fiber for substantial enhancement in thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Silicon 10:585–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9496-710.1007/s12633-016-9496-7 ↗
76. Suresh S, Nisha P, Saravanan P et al (2018) Investigation of the Thermal and Dielectric Behavior of Epoxy Nano-Hybrids by using Silane Modified Nano-ZnO. Silicon 10:1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9604-310.1007/s12633-017-9604-3 ↗
77. Qiao R, Yang C, Gao M (2009) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: from preparations to in vivo MRI applications. J Mater Chem 19:6274. https://doi.org/10.1039/b902394a10.1039/b902394a ↗
78. Feng B, Hong RY, Wang LS et al (2008) Synthesis of Fe3O4/APTES/PEG diacid functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging. Colloids Surf A 328:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.02410.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.024 ↗
79. Yamaura M, Camilo RL, Sampaio LC et al (2004) Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane-coated magnetite nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 279:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.09410.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.094 ↗
80. Olariu CI, Yiu HHP, Bouffier L et al (2011) Multifunctional Fe3O4 nanoparticles for targeted bi-modal imaging of pancreatic cancer. J Mater Chem 21:12650. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11370d10.1039/c1jm11370d ↗
81. Ghutepatil PR, Salunkhe AB, Khot VM, Pawar SH (2019) APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxy silane) functionalized MnFe2O4 nanoparticles: a potential material for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. Chem Pap 73:2189–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00768-z10.1007/s11696-019-00768-z ↗
82. Pan M, Kim M, Blauch L, Tang SKY (2016)Surface-functionalizable amphiphilic nanoparticles for pickering emulsions with designer fluid–fluid interfaces. RSC Adv 6:39926–39932. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA03950B10.1039/C6RA03950B ↗
83. Zhou Y, Quan G, Wu Q et al (2018) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 8:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.01.00710.1016/j.apsb.2018.01.007 ↗
84. Shen L, Li B, Qiao Y (2018) Fe3O4 nanoparticles in targeted drug/gene delivery systems. Materials 11:324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1102032410.3390/ma11020324 ↗
85. Hosseini F, Sadjadi M, Farhadyar N (2014) Fe3O4 nanoparticles modified with APTES as the carrier for (+)-(S)-2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl) propanoic acid (Naproxen) and (RS) 2-(3-benzoylphenyl)-propionic acid (Ketoprofen) drug. Orient J Chem 30:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/30042010.13005/ojc/300420 ↗
86. Saif B, Wang C, Chuan D, Shuang S (2015) Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4 coated on APTES as carriers for morin-anticancer drug. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 06:267–275. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2015.6402510.4236/jbnb.2015.64025 ↗
87. Karade VC, Sharma A, Dhavale RP et al (2021) APTES monolayer coverage on self-assembled magnetic nanospheres for controlled release of anticancer drug Nintedanib. Sci Rep 11:5674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84770-010.1038/s41598-021-84770-0 ↗
88. Javid A, Ahmadian S, Saboury AA et al (2014) Biocompatible APTES–PEG modified magnetite nanoparticles: effective carriers of antineoplastic agents to ovarian cancer. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173:36–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0740-610.1007/s12010-014-0740-6 ↗
89. Dayyani N, Ramazani A, Khoee S, Shafiee A (2018) Synthesis and characterization of the first generation of Polyamino-ester dendrimer-grafted magnetite nanoparticles from 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane(APTES) via the convergent approach. Silicon 10:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9497-610.1007/s12633-016-9497-6 ↗
90. Al Roaya MA, Manteghi F, Haghverdi M (2019) Synthesis and characterization of hollow mesoporous silica spheres and studying the load and release of dexamethasone. Silicon 11:1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9943-810.1007/s12633-018-9943-8 ↗
91. Zhao X, Shang T, Zhang X et al (2016) Passage of magnetic Tat-Conjugated Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles across in vitro blood-brain barrier. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1676-210.1186/s11671-016-1676-2 ↗
92. Dettin M, Bagno A, Gambaretto R et al (2009) Covalent surface modification of titanium oxide with different adhesive peptides: Surface characterization and osteoblast-like cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 90A:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3206410.1002/jbm.a.32064 ↗
93. Vinzant N, Scholl JL, Wu C-M et al (2017) Iron oxide nanoparticle delivery of peptides to the brain: reversal of anxiety during drug withdrawal. Front Neurosci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.0060810.3389/fnins.2017.00608 ↗
94. Givens BE, Xu Z, Fiegel J, Grassian VH (2017) Bovine serum albumin adsorption on SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticle surfaces at circumneutral and acidic pH: A tale of two nano-bio surface interactions. J Colloid Interface Sci 493:334–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.01110.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.011 ↗
95. Maltas E, Ozmen M, Vural HC et al (2011) Immobilization of albumin on magnetite nanoparticles. Mater Lett 65:3499–3501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.04510.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.045 ↗
96. Can K, Ozmen M, Ersoz M (2009) Immobilization of albumin on aminosilane modified superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and its characterization. Colloids Surf B 71:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.01.02110.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.01.021 ↗
97. Li Y, Zhang Y, Jiang L et al (2016) A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor based on the biotin- streptavidin-biotin structure for detection of human immunoglobulin G. Sci Rep 6:22694. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2269410.1038/srep22694 ↗
98. Safari J, Zarnegar Z (2014) Ultrasonic activated efficient synthesis of chromenes using amino-silane modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles: A versatile integration of high catalytic activity and facile recovery. J Mol Struct 1072:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.04.02310.1016/j.molstruc.2014.04.023 ↗
99. Ghasemzadeh MA, Abdollahi-Basir MH, Babaei M (2015) Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2core-shell nanocomposite as an efficient and green catalyst for the multi-component synthesis of highly substituted chromeno[2,3-b]pyridines in aqueous ethanol media. Green Chem Lett Rev 8:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2015.110713910.1080/17518253.2015.1107139 ↗
100. Kusiak-Nejman E, Sienkiewicz A, Wanag A et al (2021) The role of adsorption in the photocatalytic decomposition of dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 nanomaterials. Catalysts 11:172. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1102017210.3390/catal11020172 ↗