A Review on Waste Glass-based Geopolymer Composites as a Sustainable Binder
Source abstract
Abstract
Waste glass (WG) is one of the major constituents of municipal solid waste, rich in amorphous silica.. The present article comprehensively reviews the geopolymer materials synthesized with waste glass powder (WGP) as one of the precursors. The fresh, hardened and durability properties of the material are appraised, emphasizing the effect of synthesis parameters. The embodied energy and the embodied CO2 in WGP-based geopolymer are presented to highlight its sustainability. The workability and setting times of the geopolymer are highly influenced by the surface properties of the glass particle. A certain dosage of WGP significantly improves the mechanical and durability properties of the geopolymer. Further, other synthesis parameters such as the type of co-precursor, the particle size of WGP, the type of alkali activator and its concentration, and the liquid activator to solid binder ratio also cause predominant changes in the material properties. Durability studies on WGP-based geopolymers are limited, particularly the quantification of alkali-silica reactions and resistance towards chemical attacks. In addition, advanced sustainable studies are essential for promoting WGP-based geopolymer as a sustainable material. Overall, previous studies indicate the effective incorporation of WGP as a precursor material because of its relatively better performance than other cementitious materials. This review gives the researchers and field engineers a better understanding of utilizing WGP as a precursor in the synthesis of geopolymer.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (93)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang X, Xiao R, Ma Y et al (2020) Influence of waste glass powder on the physico-mechanical properties and microstructures of fly ash-based geopolymer paste after exposure to high temperatures. Constr Build Mater 262:120579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12057910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120579 ↗
2. Garside M (2021) Glass containers and bottles global production volume 2020 & 2026. In: Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/700260/glass-bottles-and-containers-production-volume-worldwide. Accessed 5 Mar 2023
3. Xiao R, Huang B, Zhou H et al (2022) A state-of-the-art review of crushed urban waste glass used in OPC and AAMs (geopolymer): Progress and challenges. Clean Mater 4:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.10008310.1016/j.clema.2022.100083 ↗
4. Zhang Y, Xiao R, Jiang X et al (2020) Effect of particle size and curing temperature on mechanical and microstructural properties of waste glass-slag-based and waste glass-fly ash-based geopolymers. J Clean Prod 273:122970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12297010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122970 ↗
5. Dadsetan S, Siad H, Lachemi M, Sahmaran M (2020) Extensive evaluation on the effect of glass powder on the rheology, strength, and microstructure of metakaolin-based geopolymer binders. Constr Build Mater 268:121168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12116810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121168 ↗
6. 20 Recycling Statistics for Eco-Conscious Canadians in 2022 (2022). https://reviewmoose.ca/blog/recycling-statistics/. Accessed 8 Mar 2023
7. Zhang L, Yue Y (2018) Influence of waste glass powder usage on the properties of alkali-activated slag mortars based on response surface methodology. Constr Build Mater 181:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.04010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.040 ↗
8. Manikandan P, Vasugi V, Siddika A et al (2021) A critical review of waste glass powder as an aluminosilicate source material for sustainable geopolymer concrete production. Silicon 13:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00929-w10.1007/s12633-020-00929-w ↗
9. Dong W, Li W, Tao Z (2021) A comprehensive review on performance of cementitious and geopolymeric concretes with recycled waste glass as powder, sand or cullet. Resour Conserv Recycl 172:105664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10566410.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105664 ↗
10. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC (2008) Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities - a review. Waste Manag 28:459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.00810.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008 ↗
11. Nandy B, Sharma G, Garg S et al (2015) Recovery of consumer waste in India - a mass flow analysis for paper, plastic and glass and the contribution of households and the informal sector. Resour Conserv Recycl 101:167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.01210.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.012 ↗
12. Solid waste diversion and disposal (2022) . https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators/solid-waste-diversion-disposal.html. Accessed 8 Mar 2023
13. Xiao R, Ma Y, Jiang X et al (2020) Strength, microstructure, efflorescence behavior and environmental impacts of waste glass geopolymers cured at ambient temperature. J Clean Prod 252:119610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11961010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119610 ↗
14. Duxson PJL, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ (2007) The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of “green concrete.” Cem Concr Res 37:1590–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018 ↗
15. Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers - Inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37:1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0191219310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
16. Davidovits J, Davidovics M, Davidovits N (1994) Process for obtaining a geopolymeric alumno-slicate and products thus obtained. United States Patent, No. 5,342,595, Aug. 30, 1994
17. Assaedi H, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2016) Effect of nano-clay on mechanical and thermal properties of geopolymer. J Asian Ceram Soc 4:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2015.10.00410.1016/j.jascer.2015.10.004 ↗
18. Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB (2016) Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete. Ceram Int 42:3000–3006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.08410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.084 ↗
19. Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2017) Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 135:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111 ↗
20. Degefu DM, Liao Z, Berardi U, Labbé G (2022) The dependence of thermophysical and hygroscopic properties of macro-porous geopolymers on Si/Al. J Non Cryst Solids 582:121432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12143210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121432 ↗
21. Aziz IH, Al Bakri Abdullah MM, Heah CY, Liew YM (2020) Behaviour changes of ground granulated blast furnace slag geopolymers at high temperature. Adv Cem Res 32:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.18.0016210.1680/JADCR.18.00162 ↗
22. Hamid Abed M, Abbas IS, Canakci H (2022) Influence of mechanochemical activation on the rheological, fresh, and mechanical properties of one-part geopolymer grout. Adv Cem Res:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.21.0020510.1680/JADCR.21.00205 ↗
23. Zhang YS, Sun W, Li ZJ (2005) Hydration process of potassium polysialate (K-PSDS) geopolymer cement. Adv Cem Res 17:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2005.17.1.2310.1680/adcr.2005.17.1.23 ↗
24. Das D, Rout PK (2023) Synthesis of inorganic polymeric materials from industrial solid waste. Silicon 15:1771–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02116-510.1007/s12633-022-02116-5 ↗
25. Nadeem M, Ilyas S, Haq EU et al (2022) Improved water retention and positive behavior of silica based geopolymer utilizing granite powder. Silicon 14:2337–2349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01047-x10.1007/s12633-021-01047-x ↗
26. Radhika N, Sathish M (2022) A review on Si-based ceramic matrix composites and their infiltration based techniques. Springer, Netherlands10.1007/s12633-022-01763-y ↗
27. Awoyera P, Adesina A (2019) A critical review on application of alkali activated slag as a sustainable composite binder. Case Stud Constr Mater 11:e00268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e0026810.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00268 ↗
28. Driouich A, Chajri F, El Hassani SEA et al (2020) Optimization synthesis geopolymer based mixture metakaolin and fly ash activated by alkaline solution. J Non Cryst Solids 544:120197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12019710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120197 ↗
29. Sivasakthi M, Jeyalakshmi R, Rajamane NP, Jose R (2018) Thermal and structural micro analysis of micro silica blended fly ash based geopolymer composites. J Non Cryst Solids 499:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.07.02710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.07.027 ↗
30. Bouguermouh K, Bouzidi N, Mahtout L et al (2017) Effect of acid attack on microstructure and composition of metakaolin-based geopolymers: the role of alkaline activator. J Non Cryst Solids 463:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.03.01110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.03.011 ↗
31. Wang Y, Wang X, Lou Y et al (2022) Effect of mechanical activation on reaction mechanism of one-part fly ash/slag-based geopolymer. Adv Cem Res. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.21.0003310.1680/JADCR.21.00033 ↗
32. Poowancum A, Aengchuan P (2022) Utilisation of low-reactivity fly ash for fabricating geopolymer materials. Adv Cem Res:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.21.0002510.1680/JADCR.21.00025 ↗
33. Zhang J, Li S, Li Z et al (2021) Workability and microstructural properties of red-mud-based geopolymer with different particle sizes. Adv Cem Res 33:210–223. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.19.0008510.1680/JADCR.19.00085 ↗
34. Liu L, Liu H, Xu Y et al (2022) Chemical deformation and mass change of metakaolin-based geopolymer grouting material in sulfate environment. Adv Cem Res. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.21.0009010.1680/JADCR.21.00090 ↗
35. Khater HM (2014) Studying the effect of thermal and acid exposure on alkaliactivated slag geopolymer. Adv Cem Res 26:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.11.0005210.1680/adcr.11.00052 ↗
36. Tome S, Nana A, Kaze CR et al (2022) Resistance of alkali-activated blended volcanic ash-MSWI-FA mortar in sulphuric acid and artificial seawater. Silicon 14:2687–2694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01055-x10.1007/s12633-021-01055-x ↗
37. Papa E, Medri V, Landi E et al (2014) Production and characterization of geopolymers based on mixed compositions of metakaolin and coal ashes. Mater Des 56:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.05410.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.054 ↗
38. Cyr M, Idir R, Poinot T (2012) Properties of inorganic polymer (geopolymer) mortars made of glass cullet. J Mater Sci 47:2782–2797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6107-210.1007/s10853-011-6107-2 ↗
39. Christiansen MU (2013) An investigation of waste glass-based geopolymers supplemented with alumina. Diss Michigan Technol Univ 21:1–416
40. Maraghechi H, Salwocki S, Rajabipour F (2017) Utilisation of alkali activated glass powder in binary mixtures with Portland cement, slag, fly ash and hydrated lime. Mater Struct Constr 50:16. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0922-510.1617/s11527-016-0922-5 ↗
41. Zhang S, Keulen A, Arbi K, Ye G (2017) Waste glass as partial mineral precursor in alkali-activated slag/fly ash system. Cem Concr Res 102:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.01210.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.012 ↗
42. Samarakoon MH, Ranjith PG, De Silva VRS (2020) Effect of soda-lime glass powder on alkali-activated binders: rheology, strength and microstructure characterization. Constr Build Mater 241:118013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11801310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118013 ↗
43. Rashidian-Dezfouli H, Rangaraju PR, Kothala VSK (2018) Influence of selected parameters on compressive strength of geopolymer produced from ground glass fiber. Constr Build Mater 162:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.16610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.166 ↗
44. Sadat MR, Bringuier S, Muralidharan K et al (2016) An atomistic characterization of the interplay between composition, structure and mechanical properties of amorphous geopolymer binders. J Non Cryst Solids 434:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.11.02210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.11.022 ↗
45. Idir R, Cyr M, Tagnit-Hamou A (2013) Role of the nature of reaction products in the differing behaviours of fine glass powders and coarse glass aggregates used in concrete. Mater Struct Constr 46:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9897-z10.1617/s11527-012-9897-z ↗
46. Puertas F, Torres-Carrasco M (2014) Use of glass waste as an activator in the preparation of alkali-activated slag. Mechanical strength and paste characterisation. Cem Concr Res 57:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.005 ↗
47. Rakhimova NR, Rakhimov RZ (2019) Toward clean cement technologies: a review on alkali-activated fly-ash cements incorporated with supplementary materials. J Non Cryst Solids 509:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.02510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.025 ↗
48. Mendes BC, Pedroti LG, Vieira CMF et al (2022) Evaluation of eco-efficient geopolymer using chamotte and waste glass-based alkaline solutions. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e00847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0084710.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00847 ↗
49. Liu Y, Shi C, Zhang Z, Li N (2019) An overview on the reuse of waste glasses in alkali-activated materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.007 ↗
50. Shi C, Zheng K (2007) A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.01310.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.013 ↗
51. Wang WC, Chen BT, Wang HY, Chou HC (2016) A study of the engineering properties of alkali-activated waste glass material (AAWGM). Constr Build Mater 112:962–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.022 ↗
52. Bobirică C, Shim JH, Pyeon JH, Park JY (2015) Influence of waste glass on the microstructure and strength of inorganic polymers. Ceram Int 41:13638–13649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.16010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.160 ↗
53. Shevchenko VV, Kotsay GN (2020) Influence of glass powder additives on the hydration process of Portland cement. Glas Phys Chem 46:653–656. https://doi.org/10.1134/S108765962006023110.1134/S1087659620060231 ↗
54. Long WJ, Lin C, Ye TH et al (2021) Stabilization/solidification of hazardous lead glass by geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 294:123574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12357410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123574 ↗
55. Sobolev K, Türker P, Soboleva S, Iscioglu G (2007) Utilization of waste glass in ECO-cement: strength properties and microstructural observations. Waste Manag 27:971–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.01410.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.014 ↗
56. Liu G, Florea MVA, Brouwers HJH (2019) Waste glass as binder in alkali activated slag–fly ash mortars. Mater Struct Constr 52:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1404-310.1617/s11527-019-1404-3 ↗
57. Ahmad J, Zhou Z (2023) Strength and durability properties of waste glass based self compacting concrete: a review. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02413-710.1007/s12633-023-02413-7 ↗
58. Mallum I, Abdul AR, Lim NHAS, Omolayo N (2022) Sustainable utilization of waste glass in concrete: a review. Silicon 14:3199–3214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01152-x10.1007/s12633-021-01152-x ↗
59. El-Shamy TM, Pantano CG (1977) Decomposition of silicate glasses in alkaline solutions. Nature 266:704–70610.1038/266704a0 ↗
60. El-Naggar MR, El-Dessouky MI (2017) Re-use of waste glass in improving properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers: mechanical and microstructure examinations. Constr Build Mater 132:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.023 ↗
61. Yoo DY, Lee Y, You I et al (2022) Utilization of liquid crystal display (LCD) glass waste in concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 130:104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10454210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104542 ↗
62. Kouassi SS, Andji J, Bonnet JP, Rossignol S (2010) Dissolution of waste glasses in high alkaline solutions. Ceram - Silikaty 54:235–240
63. Vafaei M, Allahverdi A (2017) High strength geopolymer binder based on waste-glass powder. Adv Powder Technol 28:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.09.03410.1016/j.apt.2016.09.034 ↗
64. Wang CC, Wang HY, Chen BT, Peng YC (2017) Study on the engineering properties and prediction models of an alkali-activated mortar material containing recycled waste glass. Constr Build Mater 132:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.103 ↗
65. Shoaei P, Ameri F, Reza Musaeei H et al (2020) Glass powder as a partial precursor in Portland cement and alkali-activated slag mortar: a comprehensive comparative study. Constr Build Mater 251:118991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11899110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118991 ↗
66. Si R, Guo S, Dai Q, Wang J (2020) Atomic-structure, microstructure and mechanical properties of glass powder modified metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 254:119303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11930310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119303 ↗
67. Das SK, Shrivastava S (2022) Durability analysis and optimization of a binary system of waste cement concrete and glass-based geopolymer mortar. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24:1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01400-110.1007/s10163-022-01400-1 ↗
68. Varma DN, Singh SP (2023) Recycled waste glass as precursor for synthesis of slag-based geopolymer. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.51610.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.516 ↗
69. Lu JX, Poon CS (2018) Use of waste glass in alkali activated cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 160:399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.080 ↗
70. Li L, Lu JX, Zhang B, Poon CS (2020) Rheology behavior of one-part alkali activated slag/glass powder (AASG) pastes. Constr Build Mater 258:120381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12038110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120381 ↗
71. Manikandan P, Natrayan L, Duraimurugan S, Vasugi V (2022) Influence of waste glass powder as an aluminosilicate precursor in synthesizing ternary blended alkali-activated binder. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01533-210.1007/s12633-021-01533-2 ↗
72. İpek S (2022) Macro and micro characteristics of eco-friendly fly ash-based geopolymer composites made of different types of recycled sand. J Build Eng 52:104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10443110.1016/j.jobe.2022.104431 ↗
73. J-xin Lu, Z-hua Duan, Poon CS (2017) Combined use of waste glass powder and cullet in architectural mortar. Cem Concr Compos 82:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.011 ↗
74. Samantasinghar S, Singh SP (2018) Effect of synthesis parameters on compressive strength of fly ash-slag blended geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 170:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.02610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.026 ↗
75. Palacios M, Puertas F (2011) Effectiveness of mixing time on hardened properties of waterglass-activated slag pastes and mortars. ACI Mater J 108:73–78. https://doi.org/10.14359/5166421810.14359/51664218 ↗
76. Mithanthaya IR, Marathe S, Rao NBS, Bhat V (2017) Influence of superplasticizer on the properties of geopolymer concrete using industrial wastes. Mater Today Proc 4:9803–9806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.27010.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.270 ↗
77. Toniolo N, Taveri G, Hurle K et al (2017) Fly-ash-based geopolymers: how the addition of recycled glass or red mud waste influences the structural and mechanical properties. J Ceram Sci Technol 8:411–419. https://doi.org/10.4416/JCST2017-0005310.4416/JCST2017-00053 ↗
78. Toniolo N, Rincón A, Roether JA et al (2018) Extensive reuse of soda-lime waste glass in fly ash-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 188:1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.09610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.096 ↗
79. Yoo DY, Lee SK, You I et al (2022) Development of strain-hardening geopolymer mortar based on liquid-crystal display (LCD) glass and blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 331:127334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12733410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127334 ↗
80. Derinpinar AN, Karakoç MB, Özcan A (2022) Performance of glass powder substituted slag based geopolymer concretes under high temperature. Constr Build Mater 331:127318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12731810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127318 ↗
81. Sethi H, Bansal PP, Sharma R (2019) Effect of addition of GGBS and glass powder on the properties of geopolymer concrete. Iran J Sci Technol - Trans Civ Eng 43:607–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0202-410.1007/s40996-018-0202-4 ↗
82. Zribi M, Samet B, Baklouti S (2019) Effect of curing temperature on the synthesis, structure and mechanical properties of phosphate-based geopolymers. J Non Cryst Solids 511:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.03210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.032 ↗
83. Verma M, Dev N (2022) Effect of liquid to binder ratio and curing temperature on the engineering properties of the geopolymer concrete. Silicon 14:1743–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-00985-w10.1007/s12633-021-00985-w ↗
84. Ojha A, Aggarwal P (2023) Development of mix design guidelines for low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete – a quantitative approach. Silicon 15:3681–3694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02299-510.1007/s12633-023-02299-5 ↗
85. Toniolo N (2019) Novel geopolymers incorporating silicate waste. Thesis report, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU)
86. Martinez-Lopez R, Ivan Escalante-Garcia J (2016) Alkali activated composite binders of waste silica soda lime glass and blast furnace slag: strength as a function of the composition. Constr Build Mater 119:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.064 ↗
87. Wang W, Noguchi T (2020) Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in the alkali-activated cement (AAC) system: a state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater 252:119105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11910510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119105 ↗
88. He P, Zhang B, Lu JX, Poon CS (2020) A ternary optimization of alkali-activated cement mortars incorporating glass powder, slag and calcium aluminate cement. Constr Build Mater 240:117983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11798310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117983 ↗
89. He P, Zhang B, Lu JX, Poon CS (2021) Reaction mechanisms of alkali-activated glass powder-ggbs-CAC composites. Cem Concr Compos 122:104143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10414310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104143 ↗
90. Hui-Teng N, Cheng-Yong H, Yun-Ming L et al (2022) Comparison of thermal performance between fly ash geopolymer and fly ash-ladle furnace slag geopolymer. J Non Cryst Solids 585:121527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12152710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121527 ↗
91. Abdulkareem OA, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Kamarudin H et al (2014) Effects of elevated temperatures on the thermal behavior and mechanical performance of fly ash geopolymer paste, mortar and lightweight concrete. Constr Build Mater 50:377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.047 ↗
92. Xiao R, Jiang X, Wang Y et al (2021) Experimental and thermodynamic study of alkali-activated waste glass and calcium sulfoaluminate cement blends: shrinkage, efflorescence potential, and phase assemblages. J Mater Civ Eng 33:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000394110.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003941 ↗
93. Bobirică C, Shim JH, Park JY (2018) Leaching behavior of fly ash-waste glass and fly ash-slag-waste glass-based geopolymers. Ceram Int 44:5886–5893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.08510.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.085 ↗