journal article·2026-04Open access

Photosynthetic, Nutritional Efficiency, and Productivity of Fig Trees Under Pruning Management and Fertilization with Potassium Silicate in the Semi-Arid Region

Agda Malany Forte de Oliveira, Vander Mendonça, Patrycia Elen Costa Amorim, Raires Irlenizia da Silva Freire, Lucas Rodrigues Bezerra da Silva, Ana Beatriz Donato Pinheiro, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros Mendonça, Luderlândio de Andrade Silva, Pedro Dantas Fernandes, Railene Hérica Carlos Rocha Araújo, Francisco Vanies da Silva Sá

Silicon· Volume 18· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The fig tree ( Ficus carica L.) is a remarkable species, demonstrating its adaptability to environments with consistently high temperatures, such as semi-arid regions. This adaptability underscores the importance of selecting the correct management for its cultivation, as it directly influences the plant's physiology and development, and consequently, its productivity. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of potassium silicate application and pruning management in fig trees to optimize photosynthetic efficiency, biomass accumulation, and productivity under a semi-arid climate. Methods The experimental design employed was a randomized block design in a 5 × 3 factorial scheme, with five blocks and one plant per plot. The treatments consisted of five potassium silicate doses (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) applied foliarly, along with three numbers of productive branches (3, 6, and 9). Results Applying potassium silicate at doses (0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) associated with six and nine productive branches increased the photosynthesis of fig trees. The 0.5% dose produced subtle changes in the photosynthetic processes of fig trees, primarily reflected in productivity, resulting in increases of 59.91% in productivity and 49.08% in dry matter accumulation in the aerial parts of the plants. Conclusions The application of potassium silicate, combined with pruning management, optimized the phytotechnical variables of the 'Roxo de Valinhos' fig tree under semi-arid conditions. Fig trees with six productive branches subjected to applications of 0.5% potassium silicate showed significant improvements in leaf gas exchange, increased net photosynthesis, and a considerable increase in biomass accumulation and plant productivity. Highlights Potassium silicate is an appropriate way to apply Si to the fig tree "Roxo de Valinhos." Potassium silicate, when used in pruning management, optimized the phytotechniques characteristics of the fig tree "Roxo de Valinhos." Applying potassium silicate increased net photosynthesis, biomass accumulation, and productivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species · Silicon Effects in Agriculture · Clay minerals and soil interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Silva DMA, da Silva Santos NP, Santos EEDSA, Pereira GA, da Silva Júnior GB, da Cunha JG (2022) Effects of formative and production pruning on fig growth, phenology, and production. Rev Fac Cienc Agrar UNCuyo 54(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.06110.48162/rev.39.061 ↗
2. Charafi J, Houmanat K, El Kettabi Z, Messaoudi Z, Haddou LA, Outghouliast H, Mamouni A, Tahiri M (2022) Molecular determination of denomination confusion among the main cultivated fig trees (Ficus carica L.) in Morocco. Erwerbs-obstbau 64:631–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00715-510.1007/s10341-022-00715-5 ↗
3. Ecker SL, Lugaresi A, Girardi GC, Louis B, Galon L, Giacobbo CL (2020) Conduction systems in fig tree with two cultivars, evaluating fruits quality and yield. Sci Agrar Parana 19(1):77–82
4. Özkul M, Nikpeyma Y, Özen M (2022) Effects of different pruning intensities on growth and fruit quality in Sarılop fig varieties. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg 59(2):249–263. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.99829410.20289/zfdergi.998294 ↗
5. Pio R, Sanchez OMP, Ribeiro CHM, Fazenda LHV, Silva ADD, Peche PM (2023) Decreased spacing with different numbers of branches to enhance green fig production. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 58:e03135. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2023.v58.0313510.1590/S1678-3921.pab2023.v58.03135 ↗
6. Caetano LCS, Carvalho AJCD, Campostrine E, Sousa EFD, Murakami KRN, Cereja BS (2005) Efeito do número de ramos produtivos sobre o desenvolvimento da área foliar e produtividade da figueira. Rev Bras Frutic 27(3):426–429. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-2945200500030002110.1590/S0100-29452005000300021 ↗
7. Campagnolo MA, Pio R, Dalastra IM, Chagas EA, Guimarães VF, Dalastra GM (2010) Sistema desponte na produção de figos verdes “Roxo de Valinhos.” Cienc Rural 40(1):25–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-8478200900500021910.1590/S0103-84782009005000219 ↗
8. Silva FSO (2018) Estudo da figueira cv. Roxo de Valinhos no oeste potiguar. Tese (Doutorado em Fitotecnia) – Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-árido, Mossoró, p 78
9. Kumar M, Rawat V, Rawat JMS, Tomar YK (2010) Effect of pruning intensity on peach yield and fruit quality. Sci Hortic 125(3):218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.03.02710.1016/j.scienta.2010.03.027 ↗
10. Von Bennewitz E, Fredes C, Losak T, Martínez C, Hlusek J (2011) Effects on fruit production and quality of different dormant pruning intensities in 'Bing’/’Gisela® 6’sweet cherries (Prunus avium) in Central Chile. Cienc Investig Agrar 38(3):339–344. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-1620201100030000310.4067/S0718-16202011000300003 ↗
11. Ghosh A, Dey K, Bhowmick N, Medda PS, Ghosh SK (2016) Impact of different pruning severity and nutrient management on growth and yield of lemon cv. Assam Lemon (Citrus limon Burm.). Vegetos 29(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2229-4473.100010610.4172/2229-4473.1000106 ↗
12. Moura EAD, Mendonça V, Ferreira EDS, Oliveira LM, Melo BEF (2021) Management systems on production and physicochemical traits of fruits of conventionally and organically grown fig. Rev Caatinga 34(4):867–878. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n414rc10.1590/1983-21252021v34n414rc ↗
13. Souri Z, Khanna K, Karimi N, Ahmad P (2021) Silicon and plants: current knowledge and future prospects. J Plant Growth Regul 40:906–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10172-710.1007/s00344-020-10172-7 ↗
14. Mustafa T, Sattar A, Sher A, Ul-Allah S, Ijaz M, Irfan M, Butt M, Cheema M (2021) Exogenous application of silicon improves the performance of wheat under terminal heat stress by triggering physio-biochemical mechanisms. Sci Rep 11(1):23170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02594-410.1038/s41598-021-02594-4 ↗
15. Kumar RR, Rai GK, Kota S, Watts A, Sakhare A, Kumar S, Goswami S, Kapoor N, Babu P, Mishra GP, Kumar SN, Chinnusamy V, Praveen S (2023) Fascinating dynamics of silicon in the alleviation of heat stress-induced oxidative damage in plants. Plant Growth Regul 100:321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00879-w10.1007/s10725-022-00879-w ↗
16. Sehgal A, Sita K, Siddique KH, Kumar R, Bhogireddy S, Varshney RK, HanumanthaRao B, Nair RM, Prasad PV, Nayyar H (2018) Drought and/or heat-stress effects on seed filling in food crops: impacts on functional biochemistry, seed yields, and nutritional quality. Front Plant Sci 9:388913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.0170510.3389/fpls.2018.01705 ↗
17. Carneiro-Carvalho A, Anjos R, Pinto T (2021) Stress oxidative evaluation on sik®-supplemented Castanea sativa mill. plants grow in high temperatures. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00370-310.1007/s42729-020-00370-3 ↗
18. Agarie S, Hanaoka N, Ueno O, Miyazaki A, Kubota F, Agata W, Kaufman PB (1998) Effects of silicon on tolerance to water deficit and heat stress in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.), monitored by electrolyte leakage. Plant Prod. Sci 1(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.1.9610.1626/pps.1.96 ↗
19. Sivanesan I, Son MS, Soundararajan P, Jeong BR (2014) Effect of silicon on growth and temperature stress tolerance of Nephrolepis Exaltata “corditas.” Hortic Sci Technol 32(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2014.1308010.7235/hort.2014.13080 ↗
20. Malhotra C, Kapoor RT (2019) Silicon: a sustainable tool in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Hakeem K, Nahar K, Alharby H (eds) Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_1410.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_14 ↗
21. Rios JJ, Martínez-Ballesta MC, Ruiz JM, Blasco B, Carvajal M (2017) Silicon-mediated improvement in plant salinity tolerance: the role of aquaporins. Front Plant Sci 8:254076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0094810.3389/fpls.2017.00948 ↗
22. Jesus EGD, Fatima RTD, Guerrero AC, Araújo JLD, Brito ME (2018) Growth and gas exchanges of arugula plants under silicon fertilization and water restriction. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient 22(2):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n2p119-12410.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n2p119-124 ↗
23. Rodríguez NC, Melgarejo LM, Blair MW (2019) Purple passion fruit, Passiflora edulis Sims f. edulis, variability for photosynthetic and physiological adaptation in contrasting environments. Agronomy 9(5):231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy905023110.3390/agronomy9050231 ↗
24. Ammar A, Aissa IB, Mars M, Gouiaa M (2020) Comparative physiological behavior of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in response to water stress and recovery. Sci Hortic 260:108881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.10888110.1016/j.scienta.2019.108881 ↗
25. Kimura H, Hashimoto-Sugimoto M, Iba K, Terashima I, Yamori W (2020) Improved stomatal opening enhances photosynthetic rate and biomass production in fluctuating light. J Exp Bot 71(7):2339–2350. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa09010.1093/jxb/eraa090 ↗
26. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JDM, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22(6):711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/050710.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 ↗
27. Embrapa (2009) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Embrapa Solos, Brasília, DF
28. Caetano LCS (2013) Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da figueira. INCAPER: Ed. DCM/Incaper, Vitória, Espirito Santo, Brazil
29. Sá FVS, Gheyi HR, de Lima GS, Pinheiro FWA, de Paiva EP, Moreira RCL, Silva LA, Fernandes PD (2021) The right combination of NPK fertilization may mitigate salt stress in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.). Acta Physiol Plant 43(4):59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-021-03225-110.1007/s11738-021-03225-1 ↗
30. Quaggio JÁ, Raij B, Piza JRCT (1996) Frutíferas. In: Raij B et al (eds) Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o estado de São Paulo, 2ª ed. Fundação Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Campinas, pp 121–153
31. Ferreira DF (2019) Sisvar: a computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Braz J Biom 37(4):529–535. https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i4.45010.28951/rbb.v37i4.450 ↗
32. Ali AM, Bijay-Singh (2025) Silicon: a crucial element for enhancing plant resilience in challenging environments. J Plant Nutr 48(3):486–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.240647910.1080/01904167.2024.2406479 ↗
33. Fao (2023) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and agriculture data. 2023. Available at: em: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Accessed 27 Feb 2024
34. Silva DBD, Vieira NCDS, Paixão-Daruichi AP, Furlani E Jr (2025) Application of silicon and nitrogen in gas exchange of Arabic coffee plants as a function of water availability. J Plant Nutr 8(20):3684–3694. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2025.25198401-1110.1080/01904167.2025.25198401-11 ↗
35. Świerczyński S, Zydlik Z, Kleiber T (2022) The influence of foliar nutrition of apple trees with silicon on growth and yield as well as mineral content in leaves and fruits. Agronomy 12(7):1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1207168010.3390/agronomy12071680 ↗
36. Wang M, Wang X, Wang JJ (2016) Effect of silicon application on silicon contents in “Fuji” apple in Loess Plateau. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 47(20):2325–2333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.124371410.1080/00103624.2016.1243714 ↗
37. Soppelsa S, Kelderer M, Casera C, Bassi M, Robatscher P, Andreotti C (2018) Use of biostimulants for organic apple production: effects on tree growth, yield, and fruit quality at harvest and during storage. Front Plant Sci 9:1342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.0134210.3389/fpls.2018.01342 ↗
38. Hussien MA, Kassem MS (2021) Influence of spraying kaolin, silicon, and calcium on productivity and quality of sultani fig. Egypt J Hortic 48(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejoh.2020.52431.115310.21608/ejoh.2020.52431.1153 ↗
39. Salim BBM, Abou El-Yazied A, Salama YAM, Raza A, Osman HS (2021) Impact of silicon foliar application in enhancing antioxidants, growth, flowering and yield of squash plants under deficit irrigation condition. Ann Agric Sci 66(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.12.00310.1016/j.aoas.2021.12.003 ↗
40. Abidi W, Akrimi R, Hajlaoui H, Rejeb H, Gogorcena Y (2023) Foliar fertilization of potassium silicon improved postharvest fruit quality of peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars. Agriculture 13(1):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1301019510.3390/agriculture13010195 ↗
41. Abdeen SA, Mancy AGA (2018) Amelioration of water stress effect on sorghum plant growth and water use efficiency by application of potassium silicate and salicylic acid. Egypt J Agric Sci 69(1):43–52
42. Gomaa MA, Kandil EE, El-Dein AAZ, Abou-Donia ME, Ali HM, Abdelsalam NR (2021) Increase maize productivity and water use efficiency through application of potassium silicate under water stress. Sci Rep 11(1):224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80656-910.1038/s41598-020-80656-9 ↗
43. Garg K, Dhar S, Jinger D (2020) Silicon nutrition in rice (Oryza sativa L.)–a review. Ann Agric Res 41:221–229
44. Verma KK, Anas M, Chen Z, Rajput VD, Malviya MK, Verma CL, Singh RK, Singh P, Song XP, Li YR (2020) Silicon supply improves leaf gas exchange, antioxidant defense system and growth in Saccharum officinarum responsive to water limitation. Plants 9(8):1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants908103210.3390/plants9081032 ↗
45. Verma KK, Liu XH, Wu KC, Singh RK, Song QQ, Malviya MK, Song XP, Singh P, Verma CL, Li YR (2020) The impact of silicon on photosynthetic and biochemical responses of sugarcane under different soil moisture levels. SILICON 12:1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00228-z10.1007/s12633-019-00228-z ↗
46. Tombeur F, Linden CV, Cornélis JT, Godin B, Compère P, Delvaux B (2020) Soil and climate affect foliar silicification patterns and silica-cellulose balance in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Plant Soil 452:529–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04588-z10.1007/s11104-020-04588-z ↗
47. Camargo MS, Fernández Honaine M, Osterrieth M, Bozza NG, da Mota Silva V, Benvenuto ML, de Almeida Silva M (2021) Silicon fertilization increases gas-exchange and biomass by silicophytolith deposition in the leaves of contrasting drought-tolerant sugarcane cultivars under well-watered conditions. Plant Soil 466:581–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05063-z10.1007/s11104-021-05063-z ↗
48. Galindo FS, Pagliari PH, Rodrigues WL, Fernandes GC, Boleta EHM, Santini JMK, Jalal A, Buzetti S, Lavres J, Teixeira Filho MCM (2021) Silicon amendment enhances agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in maize and wheat crops under tropical conditions. Plants 10(7):1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants1007132910.3390/plants10071329 ↗
49. Ramos AR, Dos Santos RL, Amaro ACE, Fumes LAA, Boaro CSF, Cardoso AII (2013) Eficiência do silicato de potássio no controle do oídio e no desenvolvimento de abobrinha de moita. Hortic Bras 31:432–438. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-0536201300030001410.1590/S0102-05362013000300014 ↗
50. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A (2024) Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. Artmed, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
51. Mardinata Z, Edy Sabli T, Ulpah S (2021) Biochemical responses and leaf gas exchange of fig (Ficus carica L.) to water stress, short-term elevated CO2 levels and brassinolide application. Horticulturae 7(4):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae704007310.3390/horticulturae7040073 ↗
52. Dias AS, Lima GSD, Sá FVDS, Gheyi HR, Soares LADA, Fernandes PD (2018) Gas exchanges and photochemical efficiency of West Indian cherry cultivated with saline water and potassium fertilization. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient 22(9):628–633. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n9p628-63310.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n9p628-633 ↗
53. Chen W, Yao X, Cai K, Chen J (2011) Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis, and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol Trace Elem Res 142:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8742-x10.1007/s12011-010-8742-x ↗