journal article·2022-01

Improving Maize Yield with Advancing Planting Time and Nano-Silicon Foliar Spray Alone or Combined with Zinc

Sirous Asadpour, Hamid Madani, Ghorban Nour Mohammadi, Islam Majidi Heravan, Hossein Heidari Sharif Abad

Silicon· Volume 14· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

A two years field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of planting time and foliar application of zinc (Zn) and nano silicon particle (NSP) on maize. SPAD value, leaf area index, grain quality and quantity of maize were evaluated at Haji Abad-e-Hormozgan Agriculture Research center, Hormozgan, Iran during the 2018 and 2019 growing seasons Planting time (on time and delayed planting) and foliar treatment including: no application, application of NSP, application of Zn, and application of NSP + Zn were the treatments group. At 50% tasseling, the plants measured for leaf greenness (Spad) and leaf area index. The main effects of planting time and foliar treatments significantly influenced all traits except stearic acid and oil percentage in foliar application. In addition, the interaction effect of planting time and foliar treatments showed that the SPAD, grain yield, oil yield and linoleic acid were observed with on-time planting and NSP + Zn application. Averaged across foliar treatment, leaf area index, grain weight, oil percentage, biological yield and oleic acid decreased by delay in planting date and the highest of these traits achieved from on-time planting. Increase in the linoleic acid content by delay planting and high temperature, results in decreased quality of maize meal, which is greatly influenced by Zn, NSP and environmental factors. The current findings suggest that Zn or NSP + Zn can be recommended for on-time planting to increase the grain yield of maize plants by 33% and 37% than control, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Effects in Agriculture · Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects · Crop Yield and Soil Fertility

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Chulze SN (2008) Strategies to reduce mycotoxin levels in maize during storage: a review. J Food Addit Contaminants: Part A 27(5):651–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1944004090357303210.1080/19440040903573032 ↗
2. Rosegrant MW, Zhu T, Msangi S, Sulser T (2008) Global scenarios for biofuels: impacts and implications. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 30(3):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00424.x10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00424.x ↗
3. Marek GW, Chen Y, Marek TH, Heflin KR, O’Shaughnessy SA, Gowda PH, Brauer DK (2020) Assessing planting date effects on seasonal water use of full- and short-season maize using SWAT in the southern Ogallala aquifer region. Irrig Sci 38:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00653-310.1007/s00271-019-00653-3 ↗
4. Parker PS, Shonkwiler JS, Aurbacher J (2016) Cause and consequence in maize planting dates in Germany. J Agronomy Crop Sci 203:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.1218210.1111/jac.12182 ↗
5. Baum ME, Archontoulis SV, Licht MA (2019) Planting date, hybrid maturity, and weather effects on maize yield and crop stage. Agron J 111:303–313. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.04.029710.2134/agronj2018.04.0297 ↗
6. Akinnuoye-Adelabu DB, Mabhaudhi T, Modi AT (2020) Interactive effect of planting date and fertiliser application on maize growth and yield under dryland conditions. S Afr J Plant Soil 36(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2018.152577210.1080/02571862.2018.1525772 ↗
7. Keshavarz H, Modarres-Sanavy SAM, Mahdipour Afra M (2018) Organic and chemical fertilizer affected yield and essential oil of two mint species. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants 21(6):1674–1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2018.149754510.1080/0972060X.2018.1497545 ↗
8. Safavi Fard N, Heidari Sharif Abad H, Shirani Rad AH, Majidi Heravan E, Daneshian J (2018) Effect of drought stress on qualitative characteristics of canola cultivars in winter cultivation. Industrial Crops Product 114:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.08210.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.082 ↗
9. Monzerrat Ramírez-Olvera S, Iris Trejo-Téllez L, Antonio PérezSato J, Carlos Gómez-Merino F (2019) Silicon stimulates initial growth and chlorophyll a/b ratio in rice seedlings, and alters the concentrations of Ca, B, and Zn in plant tissues. J Plant Nutr 42(16):1928–1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.164867810.1080/01904167.2019.1648678 ↗
10. Mahmoud AWM, Abdeldaym EA, Abdelaziz SM, El-Sawy MBI, Mottaleb (2019). Synergetic effects of zinc, boron, silicon, and zeolite nanoparticles on confer tolerance in potato plants subjected to salinity. Agronomy 10(1):1910.3390/agronomy10010019 ↗
11. Aqaei P, Weisany W, Diyanat M, Razmi J, Struik PC (2020) Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to potassium nano-silica application under drought stress, J Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.172750810.1080/01904167.2020.1727508 ↗
12. Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Yuvakkumar R, Prabu P, Rajendran V, Kannan N (2012) Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil. J Nanopart Res 14:129410.1007/s11051-012-1294-6 ↗
13. Elsheery NI, Helaly MN, El-Hoseiny HM, Alam-Eldein SM (2020) Zinc oxide and silicone nanoparticles to improve the resistance mechanism and annual productivity of salt-stressed mango trees. Agronomy 10(4):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1004055810.3390/agronomy10040558 ↗
14. Rizwan M, Ali S, Rehman MZ, Adrees M, Arshad M, Qayyum MF, Ali HA, Shahid Chatha SA (2019) Alleviation of cadmium accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) by foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biochar to contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 248:358–36710.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.031 ↗
15. Zolfaghari Gheshlaghi M, Pasari B, Shams K, Rokhzadi A, Mohammadi K (2019) The effect of micronutrient foliar application on yield, seed quality and some biochemical traits of soybean cultivars under drought stress. J Plant Nutr 42:2715–2730. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.165503410.1080/01904167.2019.1655034 ↗
16. Maqbool MA, Beshir A (2019) Zinc biofortification of maize (Zea mays L.): status and challenges. Plant Breed 138(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.1265810.1111/pbr.12658 ↗
17. Movahhedy-Dehnavy M, Modarres-Sanavy SAM, Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A (2009) Foliar application of zinc and manganese improves seed yield and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under water deficit stress. Ind Crop Prod 30:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.02.00410.1016/j.indcrop.2009.02.004 ↗
18. Soheili-Movahhed S, Khomari S, Sheikhzadeh P, Alizadeh B (2019) Improvement in seed quantity and quality of spring safflower through foliar application of boron and zinc under end season drought stress. J Plant Nutr 42(8):942–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.158421410.1080/01904167.2019.1584214 ↗
19. Karami S, Modarres-Sanavy SAM, Ghanehpoor S, Keshavarz H (2016) Effect of foliar zinc application on yield, physiological traits and seed vigor of two soybean cultivars under water deficit. Notulae Sci Biologia 8(2):181–191. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb.8.2.979310.15835/nsb.8.2.9793 ↗
20. Sousa A, Saleh AM, Habeeb TH, Hassan YM, Zrieq R, Wadaan MAM, Hozzein WN, Selim S, Matos M, Abd-Elgawad H (2019) Silicon dioxide nanoparticles ameliorate the phytotoxic hazards of aluminum in maize grown on acidic soil. Sci Total Environ 693:133636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13363610.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133636 ↗
21. Fathi F, Sheikhzeinoddin A, Talebnejad R (2020) Environmental and economic risk management of seed maize production in Iran. J Clean Prod 258(10):12077210.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120772 ↗
22. Lee KT, Akoh CC (1998) Characterization of enzymatically synthesized structured lipids containing eicosapentaenoic, docosahexaenoic, and caprylic acids. J Am Oil Chem Soc 75(4):495–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-998-0253-y10.1007/s11746-998-0253-y ↗
23. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Momcilovic I, Ristic Z (2011) Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 197:430–44110.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00477.x ↗
24. Zhai Y, Wu Q, Chen G, Zhang H, Yin X, Chen F (2018) Broadcasting winter wheat can increase grain yield without reducing the kernels per spike and the kernel weight. Sustainability 10(12):4858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1012485810.3390/su10124858 ↗
25. Cakmak I, Kalayci M, Ekiz H, Braun HJ, Kilinc Y, Yilmaz A (1999) Zn deficiency as a practical problem in plant and human nutrition in Turkey: a NATO-science for stability project. Field Crop Res 60:175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00139-710.1016/S0378-4290(98)00139-7 ↗
26. Kalteh M, Alipour ZT, AshraF S, Aliabadi MM, Nosratabadi AF (2014) Effect of silica nanoparticles on basil (Ocimum basilicum) under salinity stress. J Chem Health Risks 4(3):49–55
27. Xie Y, Li B, Zhang Q, Zhang C (2012) Effects of nano-silicon dioxide on photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Indocalamus barbatus McClure. J Nanjing For Univ 2:59–53
28. Keshavarz H (2020) Study of water deficit conditions and beneficial microbes on the oil quality and agronomic traits of canola (Brassica napus L.). Grasas Y Aceites 71(3):e373. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.057219110.3989/gya.0572191 ↗
29. Nazeri P, Shirani Rad AH, ValadAbadi SA, Mirakhori M, Hadidi Masoule E (2018) Effect of sowing dates and late season water deficit stress on quantitative and qualitative traits of canola cultivars. Outlook Agric 47(4):291–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/003072701879365810.1177/0030727018793658 ↗
30. Oikeh SO, Kling JG, Okoruwa AE (1998) Nitrogen management effects on maize grain quality in the West Africa moist savanna. Crop Sci 38:1056–1061. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800040029x10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800040029x ↗
31. Birun A, Shekari F, Hassanpouraghdam MB, Khorshidi MB, Esfandyari E (2011) Effects of water deficit stress on yield, yield components and phenology of canola (Brassica napus L.) at different growth stages. J Food, Agric Environ 9(3–4):506–509