journal article·2026-05

Investigating the influence of TCOs and tunneling dielectric layers on TOPCon solar cell performance

Sofia Tahir, Rabia Saeed, Shammas Mushtaq, Yasin Khan, Javed Iqbal, Effat Yasin, Qurat ul Ain Asif, Kiran Mehmood

Silicon· Volume 18· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) solar cell represents an advanced iteration of the first-generation PERT solar cell, renowned for its high power conversion efficiency. Performance of the TOPCon solar cells relies on characteristics of the dielectric material from which the tunneling occurs. In this study, performance of the Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) solar cells and the impact of various transparent conducting oxides and tunnelling oxide layers on them were accessed. The study involved a detailed analysis of key parameters, such as the use of TCOs (FTO, AZO, ZnO, ITO) as a passivation layer and optically transparent electrodes, in combination with different alternative tunnelling oxide dielectric layers (SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , HfO 2 , ZrO 2 , and TiO 2 ) by using the AFORS-HET simulation software. The results showed that existence of an ultra-thin oxide layer with low interface states density (D it ≈ 1 × 10 9 cm − 2 eV − 1 ), and pinhole density (D ph < 1 × 10 − 6 ) suppressed carrier recombination at the rear surface. The optimum solar cell performance values were found to be V oc = 693 mV, J sc = 42.71 mA/cm 2 , FF = 88.39%, and packing conversion efficiency (PCE) = 26.16% with an Al 2 O 3 tunnel dielectric layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Raugei M, Frankl P (2009) Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: current state of the art and future outlooks. Energy 34(3):392–39910.1016/j.energy.2009.01.001 ↗
2. Bhattarai S, Mhamdi A, Hossain I, Raoui Y, Pandey R, Madan J, Sharma A (2022) A detailed review of perovskite solar cells: introduction, working principle, modelling, fabrication techniques, future challenges. Micro Nanostructures 172:20745010.1016/j.micrna.2022.207450 ↗
3. Gogoi D, Bhattarai S, Kalita H, Das TD (2023) Aluminum doped zinc oxide anode film for performance enhancement of trilayer fluorescence organic light emitting diode. Mater Today Proc 73:553–56110.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.290 ↗
4. Gogoi D, Hossain MK, Das TD, Toki GF, Albaqami MD, Mohammad S, Mohammad MR (2024) Performance analysis of highlyefficient lead-free perovskite solar cells: a numerical insight. J Opt. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-01880-410.1007/s12596-024-01880-4 ↗
5. Liu Z, Chen D, Han H, Xiang J, Liu Z, Xu G, Liang Z (2023) Simulation, experimental evaluation, and characterization of a novel grid line design for TOPcon solar cells with reduced silver consumption. IEEE J Photovoltaics 13(2):213–22310.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3231526 ↗
6. Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Stokes A, Dhamrin M, Deng S, Song N (2025) Integration of aluminum contacts in TOPCon solar cells: a pathway to reduce silver usage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 285:11355910.1016/j.solmat.2025.113559 ↗
7. Ghosh DK, Das G, Bose S, Mukhopadhyay S, Sengupta A (2024) Unveiling the photovoltaic performance and thermal stability of n-TOPCon, p-TOPCon, and TOPCoRE solar cells based on 110 μm wafers. Energy Technol 12(8):240023810.1002/ente.202400238 ↗
8. Zeng Y, Tong H, Quan C, Cai L, Yang Z, Chen K, Yuan Z, Wu C-H, Yan B, Gao P, Ye J (2017) Theoretical exploration towards high-efficiency tunnel oxide passivated carrier-selective contacts (TOPCon) solar cells. Solar Energy 155:654–66010.1016/j.solener.2017.07.014 ↗
9. Madumelu, C., Bowen, F., Genhua, J., Bao, J., Seunghwan, S., Chen, R., ... & Wright, M. (2024). Impact of oxide thickness, emitter sheet resistance, and polysilicon doping concentration on the passivation quality and long-term stability of topcon solar cells. Emitter Sheet Resistance, and Polysilicon Doping Concentration on the Passivation Quality and Long-Term Stability of Topcon Solar Cells. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.468563110.2139/ssrn.4685631 ↗
10. Tong H, Wu X, Wang X, Xu X, Guo M, Liao B, Hoex B (2025) Mitigating contaminant-induced surface degradation in TOPCon solar cells: mechanisms, impacts, and mitigation. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 286:11355810.1016/j.solmat.2025.113558 ↗
11. Zhou J, Ren C, Su X, Liu X, Huang Q, Zhang X, Zhao Y (2022) Computational exploration toward tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cells: tailoring higher efficiency. Adv Theory Simul 5(4):210057010.1002/adts.202100570 ↗
12. Tao Y, Upadhyaya V, Chen CW, Payne A, Chang EL, Upadhyaya A, Rohatgi A (2016) Large area tunnel oxide passivated rear contact n-type Si solar cells with 21.2% efficiency. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 24(6):830–83510.1002/pip.2739 ↗
13. Bonilla RS, Hoex B, Hamer P, Wilshaw PR (2017) Dielectric surface passivation for silicon solar cells: a review. physica status solidi (a) 214(7):170029310.1002/pssa.201700293 ↗
14. Cheng H, Huang Z, Zhang L, Liu Y, Song X, Tong R, Shen W (2022) 21.16%-efficiency p-type TOPCon solar cell with ALD-Al2O3/MoOx/Ag as a hole-selective passivating contact. Sol Energy 247:171–17610.1016/j.solener.2022.10.019 ↗
15. Tong H, Liao M, Zhang Z, Wan Y, Wang D, Quan C, Cai L, Gao P, Guo W, Lin H, Shou C, Zeng Y, Yan B, Ye J (2018) A strong-oxidizing mixed acid derived high-quality silicon oxide tunneling layer for polysilicon passivated contact silicon solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 188:149–15510.1016/j.solmat.2018.09.001 ↗
16. Schmidt J, Werner F, Veith B, Zielke D, Steingrube S, Altermatt PP, Gatz S, Dullweber T, Brendel R (2012) Advances in the surface passivation of silicon solar cells. Energy Procedia 15:30–3910.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.004 ↗
17. Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2014) Passivated rear contacts for high-efficiency n-type Si solar cells providing high interface passivation quality and excellent transport characteristics. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 120:270–27410.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.017 ↗
18. Fell A, Schön J, Müller M, Wöhrle N, Schubert MC, Glunz SW (2018) Modeling edge recombination in silicon solar cells. IEEE J Photovoltaics 8(2):428–43410.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2787020 ↗
19. Glunz SW, Preu R, Biro D (2012) Crystalline silicon solar cells: state-of-the-art and future developments. Compr Renew Energy 1:353–38710.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00117-7 ↗
20. Sugiura T, Matsumoto S, Nakano N (2020) Numerical analysis of p-type and n-type based carrier-selective contact solar cells with tunneling oxide thickness and bulk properties. Jpn J Appl Phys 59(SG):SGGF0310.35848/1347-4065/ab6a2c ↗
21. Zhang Z, Zeng Y, Jiang CS, Huang Y, Liao M, Tong H, Al-Jassim M, Gao P, Shou C, Zhou X, Yan B, Ye J (2018) Carrier transport through the ultrathin silicon-oxide layer in tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) c-Si solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 187:113–12210.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.025 ↗
22. Feldmann F, Simon M, Bivour M, Reichel C, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2014) Efficient carrier-selective p-and n-contacts for Si solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 131:100–10410.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.039 ↗
23. Choi WJ, Ok YW, Upadhyaya AD, Min KH, Upadhyaya VD, Rounsaville B, Rohatgi A (2025) Development of 22.5% p-type tunnel oxide passivated contact solar cells through efficiency enhancement by replacing local Al-BSF in PERC cells with (p+) poly-Si/SiO2 carrier selective contact. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 283:11343610.1016/j.solmat.2025.113436 ↗
24. Richter A, Müller R, Benick J, Feldmann F, Steinhauser B, Reichel C, Fell A, Bivour M, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2021) Design rules for high-efficiency both-sides-contacted silicon solar cells with balanced charge carrier transport and recombination losses. Nat Energy 6(4):429–43810.1038/s41560-021-00805-w ↗
25. Steinkemper H, Feldmann F, Bivour M, Hermle M (2015) Numerical simulation of carrier-selective electron contacts featuring tunnel oxides. IEEE J Photovoltaics 5(5):1348–135610.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2455346 ↗
26. Steinkemper H, Feldmann F, Bivour M, Hermle M (2015) Theoretical investigation of carrier-selective contacts featuring tunnel oxides by means of numerical device simulation. Energy Procedia 77:195–20110.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.027 ↗
27. Peters IM, Hauch J, Brabec C, Sinha P (2021) The value of stability in photovoltaics. Joule 5(12):3137–315310.1016/j.joule.2021.10.019 ↗
28. Gogoi D, Das TD (2023) The role of a highly optimized approach with superior transparent conductive oxide anode towards efficient organic solar cell. Phys Scr 98(8):08590810.1088/1402-4896/ace1b5 ↗
29. Froitzheim, A., Stangl, R., Elstner, L., Kriegel, M., & Fuhs, W. (2003, May). AFORS-HET: a omputer-program for the simulation of heterojunction solar cells to be distributed for public use. In 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of (Vol. 1, pp. 279–282). IEEE. https://www.google.com/search?q=AFORS-HET%25
30. Brendel R, Peibst R (2016) Contact selectivity and efficiency in crystalline silicon photovoltaics. IEEE J Photovoltaics 6(6):1413–142010.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2598267 ↗
31. Rienäcker M, Bossmeyer M, Merkle A, Römer U, Haase F, Krügener J, Peibst R (2016) Junction resistivity of carrier-selective polysilicon on oxide junctions and its impact on solar cell performance. IEEE J Photovoltaics 7(1):11–1810.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2614123 ↗
32. Sharma AK, Chourasia NK, Chourasia RK (2022) Optical, temperature, and bulk analysis theoretically in p-Si/n-CdS heterojunction solar cell. Mater Today Proc 67:632–63610.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.094 ↗
33. Das T, Guchhait A (2024) Effect of doping in ZnO nanorod ETL based perovskite solar cells: numerical modeling to experimental verification. Mater Today Proc 104:45–5210.1016/j.matpr.2024.01.039 ↗
34. Karna LR, Upadhyay R, Ghosh A (2023) All-inorganic perovskite photovoltaics for power conversion efficiency of 31%. Sci Rep 13(1):1521210.1038/s41598-023-42447-w ↗
35. Dubey C, Jarwal DK, Kumar H, Kumar Y, Mummaneni K, Rawat G (2022) Development of highly efficient ZnO nanorod-based nontoxic perovskite solar cell using AZO buffer layer and lanthanide doping. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 69(2):622–63010.1109/TED.2021.3138375 ↗
36. Acharyya S, Sadhukhan S, Panda T, Ghosh DK, Mandal NC, Nandi A, Saha H (2022) Performance analysis of different dielectrics for solar cells with TOPCon structure. J Comput Electron 21(2):471–49010.1007/s10825-022-01866-0 ↗
37. Chavan GT, Kim Y, Khokhar MQ, Hussain SQ, Cho EC, Yi J, Ahmad Z, Rosaiah P, Jeon CW (2023) A brief review of transparent conducting oxides (TCO): the influence of different deposition techniques on the efficiency of solar cells. Nanomaterials 13(7):122610.3390/nano13071226 ↗
38. Lee S, Noh JH, Bae ST, Cho IS, Kim JY, Shin H, Hong KS (2009) Indium− tin− oxide-based transparent conducting layers for highly efficient photovoltaic devices. J Phys Chem C 113(17):7443–744710.1021/jp809011a ↗
39. Gogoi D, Bhattarai S, Das TD (2024) A numerical investigation for performance enhancement of organic solar cell using Al-doped zinc oxide anode. Indian J Phys 98(8):2705–271710.1007/s12648-023-03042-x ↗
40. Habis, C., Zaraket, J., & Aillerie, M. (2022, July). Transparent conductive oxides. Part II. Specific focus on ITO, ZnO-AZO, SnO2-FTO families for photovoltaics applications. In Defect and Diffusion Forum (Vol. 417, pp. 257–272). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-6fqmfi10.4028/p-6fqmfi ↗
41. Richter A, Benick J, Feldmann F, Fell A, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2017) N-type Si solar cells with passivating electron contact: identifying sources for efficiency limitations by wafer thickness and resistivity variation. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 173:96–10510.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.042 ↗
42. Matsumoto T, Nakajima H, Irishika D, Nonaka T, Imamura K, Kobayashi H (2017) Ultrathin SiO2 layer formed by the nitric acid oxidation of Si (NAOS) method to improve the thermal-SiO2/Si interface for crystalline Si solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 395:56–6010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.001 ↗
43. Kaur G, Xin Z, Dutta T, Sridharan R, Stangl R, Danner A (2020) Improved silicon oxide/polysilicon passivated contacts for high efficiency solar cells via optimized tunnel layer annealing. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 217:11072010.1016/j.solmat.2020.110720 ↗
44. Rajendran V, Prathuru A, Fernandez C, Sujatha D, Panda SK, Faisal NH (2024) Indium tin oxide thin film preparation and property relationship for humidity sensing: a review. Eng Rep 6(3):e12836
45. Kamioka, T., Hayashi, Y., Isogai, Y., Nakamura, K., & Ohshita, Y. (2017). Analysis of interface workfunction and process-induced damage of reactive-plasma-deposited ITO/SiO2/Si stack. AIP Advances, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499749510.1063/1.4997495 ↗
46. Lu L, Zeng Y, Liao M, Zheng J, Lin Y, Feng M, Ye J (2021) Dopant diffusion through ultrathin AlOx and AlOx/SiOx tunnel layer in TOPCon structure and its impact on the passivation quality on c-Si solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 223:11097010.1016/j.solmat.2021.110970 ↗
47. Gogoi D, Hossain MK, Das TD (2024) Investigation of excellent transparent conducting electrode for efficient organometallic halide perovskite solar cell. Indian J Phys 98(13):4595–460210.1007/s12648-024-03205-4 ↗
48. Granqvist CG (2007) Transparent conductors as solar energy materials: a panoramic review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 91(17):1529–159810.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.031 ↗
49. Yang Z, Liu Z, Cui M, Sheng J, Chen L, Lu L, Guo W, Yang X, Zhao Y, Yang W, Greer JC, Zeng Y, Yan B, Ye J (2021) Charge-carrier dynamics for silicon oxide tunneling junctions mediated by local pinholes. Cell Rep Phys Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10066710.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100667 ↗
50. Lancaster K, Großer S, Feldmann F, Naumann V, Hagendorf C (2016) Study of pinhole conductivity at passivated carrier-selected contacts of silicon solar cells. Energy Procedia 92:116–12110.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.040 ↗
51. Guthrey H, Anderson CL, Kale AS, Nemeth W, Page M, Agarwal S, Lima Anderson C, Young DL, Al-Jassim M, Stradins P (2020) Effect of surface texture on pinhole formation in SiO x-based passivated contacts for high-performance silicon solar cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12(50):55737–5574510.1021/acsami.0c12795 ↗
52. Khokhar MQ, Chowdhury S, Pham DP, Hussain SQ, Cho EC, Yi J (2021) Improving passivation properties using a nano-crystalline silicon oxide layer for high-efficiency TOPCon cells. Infrared Phys Technol 115:10372310.1016/j.infrared.2021.103723 ↗
53. Quddamah, K. M., Hussain, S. Q., ZAHID, M. A., Pham, D. P., Cho, E. C., & Yi, J. (2022). Numerical simulation and experiment of a high-efficiency Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) solar cell using a crystalline nanostructured silicon-based layer. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1201039210.3390/app12010392 ↗
54. Khokhar MQ, Hussain SQ, Zahid MA, Pham DP, Cho EC, Yi J (2021) Numerical simulation and experiment of a high-efficiency tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cell using a crystalline nanostructured silicon-based layer. Appl Sci 12(1):39210.3390/app12010392 ↗
55. Li Y, Mann D, Rolandi M, Kim W, Ural A, Hung S, Dai H (2004) Preferential growth of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes by a plasma enhanced CVD method. Nano Lett 4(2):317–32110.1021/nl035097c ↗
56. Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Steinkemper H, Hermle M, Glunz SW (2014) Tunnel oxide passivated contacts as an alternative to partial rear contacts. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 131:46–5010.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.015 ↗
57. Hoex, B., Gielis, J. J. H., Van de Sanden, M. C. M., & Kessels, W. M. M. (2008). On the c-Si surface passivation mechanism by the negative-charge-dielectric Al2O3. Journal of Applied physics, 104(11). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.302109110.1063/1.3021091 ↗
58. Kafle B, Goraya BS, Mack S, Feldmann F, Nold S, Rentsch J (2021) TOPCon–technology options for cost efficient industrial manufacturing. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 227:11110010.1016/j.solmat.2021.111100 ↗
59. Ding Y, Li L, Yin H, Jiang X, Ding J, Yuan N, Wang Q (2024) 22.56% total area efficiency of n-TOPCon solar cell with screen-printed Al paste. Sol Energy 280:11286210.1016/j.solener.2024.112862 ↗
60. Richter A, Drießen M, Rittmann C, Vescovi G, Richter M, Schindler F, Janz S (2025) TOPCon solar cells made of n-type and p-type epitaxially grown silicon wafers. Sol RRL 9(16):250032510.1002/solr.202500325 ↗
61. Khokhar, M. Q., Yousuf, H., Alamgeer, Chu, M., Rahman, R. U., Aida, M. N., ... & Yi, J. (2025). Progressive development of n-poly-Si contacts and stencil refinement for high-efficiency p-TOPCon solar cells. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-025-00755-810.1007/s40684-025-00755-8 ↗
62. Ma FJ, Li G, Wang X, Wang H, Zhou Z, Madumelu CU, Hoex B (2024) Comparative analysis of radiation-induced effects on the performance of p-type PERC and TOPCon solar cells for space applications. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 274:11300210.1016/j.solmat.2024.113002 ↗
63. Sadhukhan S, Acharyya S, Panda T, Mandal NC, Das G, Maity S, Saha H (2023) TOPerc solar cell: an integral approach of tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) and passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) architectures for achieving efficiency beyond 25%. Energy Technol 11(10):230020010.1002/ente.202300200 ↗
64. Khokhar MQ, Yousuf H, Jeong S, Kim S, Fan X, Kim Y, Yi J (2023) A review on p-type tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cell. Trans Electr Electron Mater 24(3):169–17710.1007/s42341-023-00433-z ↗
65. Sadhukhan S, Acharya S, Panda T, Mandal NC, Bose S, Nandi A, Das G, Chakraborty S, Maity S, Chaudhuri P, Saha H (2022) Detailed study on the role of nature and distribution of pinholes and oxide layer on the performance of tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cell. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 69(10):5618–562310.1109/TED.2022.3196327 ↗