Physico-mechanical and Surface Wear Assessment of Magnesium Oxide Filled Ceramic Composites for Hip Implant Application
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, applicability of ceramic composites as ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses is explored. Hence, ceramic composites containing zirconium oxide, silicon nitride, chromium oxide by varying proportion of aluminum oxide and magnesium oxide were prepared by spark plasma sintering and subsequently characterized for their physico-mechanical and tribological properties. The physico-mechanical and tribological properties of the fabricated composites were evaluated by measuring their density, void content, indentation response, fracture toughness and wear resistance respectively. The mechanical properties and wear performance of the composites are significantly improved with the addition of magnesium oxide content. Experimental results indicated that the 3 wt.% magnesium oxide based hip implant composite showed highest hardness, highest fracture toughness, highest young’s modulus with lowest wear rate. A maximum increase of approximately 44% in nanohardness, 14% in Young’s modulus, 98% in fracture toughness and 75% in wear resistance are achieved by introducing 3 wt.% magnesium oxide content. The experimental results indicated that fabricated ceramic composites will stand out as a promising material for hip implant substitution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Perrichon A, Reynard B, Gremillard L, Chevalier J, Farizon F, Geringer J (2017) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 65:600–60810.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.019 ↗
2. Trommer RM, Maru MM (2017) Rev Bras Ortop (English Edition) 52(3):251–25910.1016/j.rboe.2016.07.004 ↗
3. Napier RJ, Shimmin AJ (2016) Semin Arthroplast 27(4):235–23810.1053/j.sart.2017.03.001 ↗
4. Skinner JA, Haddad FS (2017) Bone Joint J 99-B(8):993–99510.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2017-0771 ↗
5. Yoshitoshi H, Yukiharu H, Taisuke S, Daigo K, Naoki I (2016) J Arthroplasty 31(6):1246–125010.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014 ↗
6. Vendittoli PA, Amzica T, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Girard J, Lavigne M (2011) J Arthroplasty 26(2):282–28810.1016/j.arth.2009.12.013 ↗
7. Smeekes C, Ongkiehong B, van der Wal B, Wolterbeek R, Henseler JF, Nelissen R (2015) Int Orthop 39(4):631–63810.1007/s00264-014-2605-6 ↗
8. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES, Martell JM (2016) Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):365–37110.1007/s11999-015-4319-5 ↗
9. Roy T, Choudhury D, Ghosh S, Mamat AB, Murphy BP (2015) Ceram Int Part A 41(1):681–69010.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.123 ↗
10. Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM, Meunier A, Roquancourt A, Blanquaert D, Herman S, Sedel L, Witvoet J (1988) J Biomed Mater Res Part A 22(12):1203–123210.1002/jbm.820221210 ↗
11. Iwakiri K, Iwaki H, Minoda Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K (2008) Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(5):1186–119210.1007/s11999-008-0168-9 ↗
12. Rahman HS, Choudhury D, Osman NAA, Shasmin HN, Abas WABW (2013) J Ceram Soc Jpn 121(1412):382–38710.2109/jcersj2.121.382 ↗
13. Al-Hajjar M, Carbone S, Jennings L M, Begand S, Oberbach T, Delfosse D, Fisher J (2017) Appl Biomater 105(6):1361–1368
14. Jenabzadeh AR, Pearce SJ, Walter WL (2012) Semin Arthroplast 23(4):232–24010.1053/j.sart.2012.12.007 ↗
15. Bal BS, Khandkar A, Lakshminarayanan R, Clarke I, Hoffman AA, Rahaman MN (2008) J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 87(2):447–45410.1002/jbm.b.31123 ↗
16. Mazzocchi M, Bellosi A (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(8):2881–288710.1007/s10856-008-3417-2 ↗
17. Mazzocchi M, Bellosi A (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(8):2889–290110.1007/s10856-008-3437-y ↗
18. Olofsson J, Grehk TM, Berlind T, Persson C, Jacobson S, Engqvist H (2012) Biomaterials 2:94–102
19. Pettersson M, Bryant M, Schmidt S, Engqvist H, Hall RM, Neville A, Persson C (2016) Mater Sci Eng C 62:497–50510.1016/j.msec.2016.01.049 ↗
20. Garvie RC, NIcholson PS (1972) J Am Ceram Soc 55(3):152–15710.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11241.x ↗
21. Rijal NP, Adhikari U, Khanal S, Pai D, Sankar J, Bhattarai N (2018) Mater Sci Eng B 228:18–2710.1016/j.mseb.2017.11.006 ↗
22. Zhao Y, Liu B, You C, Chen M (2016) Mater Des 89:573–58110.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.157 ↗
23. Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Kumar SP, Gobinath C, Sivaramakrishnan S (2017) Mater Lett 206:217–22010.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.004 ↗
24. Zhang Y, Shu Y, Li W, Jiang S, Cao W, Wu Z, Wang K (2017) Ceram Int 43(2):2807–281410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.122 ↗
25. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7(6):1564–158310.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
26. Anstis GR, Chantikul P, Lawn BR, Marshall DB (1981) J Am Ceram Soc 64(9):533–53810.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
27. International Standards (2012) ISO-6474-2(en), 2012-04
28. International Standards (2017) ISO-23317 First Edition 06-15
29. Liu J, Yang Y, Hassanin H, Jumbu N, Deng S, Zuo Q, Jiang K (2016) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(4):2607–261610.1021/acsami.5b10424 ↗
30. Uribe J, Geringer J, Gremillard L, Reynard B (2013) Tribol Int 63:151–15710.1016/j.triboint.2012.10.002 ↗
31. Amaral M, Maru MM, Rodrigues SP, Gouvêa CP, Trommer RM, Oliveira FJ, Achete CA, Silva RF (2015) Tribol Int 89: 72–7710.1016/j.triboint.2014.12.008 ↗