Silicon Allows Halving Cadusafos Dose to Control Meloidogyne incognita and Increase Cotton Development
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective was to analyze the suppressive effect of silicon, isolated and associated with cadusafos, on Meloidogyne incognita and the development of cotton. Experiment was carried out with cotton plants delineated in completely randomized design in a 4 × 2 factorial, with four treatments: water; silicon (2.0 mmol L−1); cadusafos (0.08 mL per pot) and cadusafos (0.04 mL per pot) + silicon (2.0 mmol L−1); combined with nematode’s absence and presence. Inoculation were carried out in the pot containing 5000 eggs and second stage juveniles. Si was applied via fertigation in all pots conform water retention capacity of the substrate, maintained at 70%. At 69 and 185 days after plant inoculation, root diameter, height and length were measured and the accumulation of Si in the aerial part was determined and the nematode population in the cotton roots was estimated. The supply of Si via fertigation was efficient increasing Si accumulation in cotton plant. Estimated nematodes population at 69 days after plant inoculation was higher in the absence of control treatment, with a greater effect of the nematicide and a lower population of M. incognita compared to the other treatments, in plants grown in the parasite presence. However, at 180 days after plant inoculation nematode population in nematicide treatment did not differ from halving dose of nematicide plus silicon treatment, as both treatments decreased nematode population. Si supply was efficient as a suppressive agent on M. incognita, increasing plant development infected with nematodes, compared to the control treatment, allowing halving cadusafos dose without jeopardize nematode control.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Effects in Agriculture · Nematode management and characterization studies · Plant Disease Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Robinson AF (2007) Reniform in U.S. cotton: when, where, why, and some remedies. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45:263–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.011107.14394910.1146/annurev.phyto.45.011107.143949 ↗
2. Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Wubben MJ et al (2012) SSR markers for marker assisted selection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resistant plants in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Euphytica 183:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0470-610.1007/s10681-011-0470-6 ↗
3. Weaver DB (2015) Cotton nematodes. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 547–57010.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0045 ↗
4. Ebone LA, Kovaleski M, Deuner CC (2009) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Plant Sci Today, 6:224–228. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2019.6.2.46810.14719/pst.2019.6.2.468 ↗
5. Jones RK (2017) Nematode control and nematicides: developments since 1982 and future trends. In: nematology in South Africa: a view from the 21st Century. Springer International Publishing, pp 129–15010.1007/978-3-319-44210-5_6 ↗
6. Papadakis EN, Tsaboula A, Vryzas Z, Kotopoulou A, Kintzikoglou K, Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E (2018) Pesticides in the rivers and streams of two river basins in northern Greece. Sci Total Environ 624:732–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.07410.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.074 ↗
7. Silva RV, Oliveira RDL, Nascimento KJT, Rodrigues FA (2010) Biochemical responses of coffee resistance against Meloidogyne exigua mediated by silicon. Plant Pathol 59:586–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02228.x10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02228.x ↗
8. Sparks TC, Crossthwaite AJ, Nauen R, Banba S, Cordova D, Earley F, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Fujioka S, Hirao A, Karmon D, Kennedy R, Nakao T, Popham HJR, Salgado V, Watson GB, Wedel BJ, Wessels FJ (2020) Insecticides, biologics and nematicides: updates to IRAC’s mode of action classification - a tool for resistance management. Pestic Biochem Physiol 167:104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.10458710.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104587 ↗
9. Zhang W, Zhao L, Zhou J, Yu H, Zhang C, Lv Y, Lin Z, Hu S, Zou Z, Sun J (2019) Enhancement of oxidative stress contributes to increased pathogenicity of the invasive pine wood nematode. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 374:20180323. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.032310.1098/rstb.2018.0323 ↗
10. Ma JF, Tamai K, Yamaji N et al (2006) A silicon transporter in rice. Nature 440:688–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0459010.1038/nature04590 ↗
11. Hodson MJ, White PJ, Mead A, Broadley MR (2015) Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants. Ann Bot 96:1027–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob10.1093/aob ↗
12. Mehrabanjoubani P, Abdolzadeh A, Sadeghipour HR, Aghdasi M (2015) Silicon affects transcellular and apoplastic uptake of some nutrients in plants. Pedosphere 25:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60004-210.1016/S1002-0160(15)60004-2 ↗
13. Le VN, Rui Y, Gui X et al (2014) Uptake, transport, distribution and bio-effects of SiO2 nanoparticles in Bt-transgenic cotton. J Nanobiotechnology 12:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-014-0050-810.1186/s12951-014-0050-8 ↗
14. Silva RV, de Lima Oliveira RD, da Silva FP et al (2015) Effects of silicon on the penetration and reproduction events of Meloidogyne exigua on cofee roots. Bragantia 74:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.36010.1590/1678-4499.360 ↗
15. Reynolds OL, Padula MP, Zeng R, Gurr GM (2016) Silicon: potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front Plant Sci 7:74410.3389/fpls.2016.00744 ↗
16. Van Raij B, Andrade JC, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA (2001) Análise química para availação da fertilidade de solos tropicais [Chemical analysis to assess the fertility of tropical soils]. Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Campinas
17. Donagema GK, Campos DBVB, Calderano SB et al (2011) Manual de métodos de análise de solo [manual of soil analysis methods]2nd edn, Rio de Janeiro
18. Kondörfer GH, Pereira HS, Nola A (2004) Análise de silício: solo, planta e fertilizante [Silicon analyse: soil, plant and fertilizers]. Uberlândia
19. Taylor DP, Netscher C (1974) An improved technique for preparing perineal patterns of Meloidogyne spp. Nematologica 20:268–269. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529274X0028510.1163/187529274X00285 ↗
20. Eisenback JD, Hirschmann H (1981) Identification of meloidogyne species on the basis of head shape and, stylet morphology of the male. J Nematol 13:513–521
21. Esbenshade PR, Triantaphyllou AC (1990) Isozyme phenotypes for the identification of Meloidogyne species. J Nematol 22:10
22. Hussey RS (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep 57:1025–1028
23. Coolen WA, D’herde CJ (1972) A method for the quantitative extraction of nematodes from plant tissue. State Agricultural Research Centre, Merelbeke, Belgium
24. Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35:1039–104210.1590/S1413-70542011000600001 ↗
25. Abad P, Favery B, Rosso MN, Castagnone-Sereno P (2003) Root-knot nematode parasitism and host response: molecular basis of a sophisticated interaction. Mol Plant Pathol 4:217–22410.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00170.x ↗
26. Meena VD, Dotaniya ML, Coumar V, Rajendiran S, Ajay, Kundu S, Subba Rao A (2014) A case for silicon fertilization to improve crop yields in tropical soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B - Biol Sci 84:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0270-y10.1007/s40011-013-0270-y ↗
27. Ferraz RLS, Medeiros AS, Viégas PRA, et al (2017) Potassium silicate optimizes the growth of naturally colored fiber cotton in the semi-arid. J Exp Agric Int 1–1410.9734/JEAI/2017/36260 ↗
28. Barros TC, de Mello PR, Roque CG et al (2019) Silicon and salicylic acid in the physiology and yield of cotton. J Plant Nutr 42:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.156776510.1080/01904167.2019.1567765 ↗
29. de Souza Junior JP, de Mello Prado R, dos Santos Sara MM, Felisberto G (2019) Silicon mitigates boron deficiency and toxicity in cotton cultivated in nutrient solution. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 182:805–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.20180039810.1002/jpln.201800398 ↗
30. Souza Junior JP, de Mello PR, Soares MB et al (2020) Effect of different foliar silicon sources on cotton plants. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00345-410.1007/s42729-020-00345-4 ↗
31. Marques Junior E, Rosas JTF, Damascena AP et al (2019) Resistance induction efficiency of silicon dioxide against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato. Rev Colomb Ciencias Hortícolas 13:55–63. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2019v13i1.783410.17584/rcch.2019v13i1.7834 ↗
32. Deshmukh R, Sonah H, Belanger R (2020) New evidence defining the evolutionary path of aquaporins regulating silicon uptake in land plants. J Exp Bot 71:6775–6788. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa34210.1093/jxb/eraa342 ↗
33. Adatia MH, Besford RT (1986) The effects of silicon on cucumber plants grown in recirculating nutrient solution. Ann Bot 58:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a08721210.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087212 ↗
34. Zargar SM, Mahajan R, Bhat JA, Nazir M, Deshmukh R (2019) Role of silicon in plant stress tolerance: opportunities to achieve a sustainable cropping system. 3. Biotech 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1613-z10.1007/s13205-019-1613-z ↗
35. Bhuiyan NH, Selvaraj G, Wei Y, King J (2009) Role of lignification in plant defense. Plant Signal Behav 4:158–159. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.2.768810.4161/psb.4.2.7688 ↗
36. Khan MA, Wahid A, Ahmad M et al (2020) World cotton production and consumption: an overview. In: Hasanuzzaman M (ed) Ahmad S. Cotton Production and Uses, Springer Singapore, pp 1–7