Photocatalytic and Thermal Characterization of SrTiO3 Doped with MgO Nanoparticles for Advanced Insulation Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Matsuo Y, Yanagisawa A, Yamashita Y (2013) A global energy outlook to 2035 with strategic considerations for Asia and Middle East energy supply and demand interdependencies. Energy Strateg Rev 2(1):79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2013.04.00210.1016/j.esr.2013.04.002 ↗
2. Serrano PVH, Zaveri A (2020) Venturing the Definition of Green Energy Transition: A systematic literature review. Gen Econ 5(1):1–16
3. Azimi MN, Rahman MM (2024) Unveiling the health consequences of air pollution in the world’s most polluted nations. Sci Rep 14(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60786-010.1038/s41598-024-60786-0 ↗
4. Wakjira TL, Gemta AB, Kassahun GB, Andoshe DM, Tadele K (2024) Bismuth-based Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts for remediation of contaminated water. ACS Omega 9(8):8709–8729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0893910.1021/acsomega.3c08939 ↗
5. Tahir MB, Sohaib M, Sagir M, Rafique M (2021) “Role of Nanotechnology in Photocatalysis”. Encycl. Smart Mater, 578–589, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815732-9.00006-110.1016/B978-0-12-815732-9.00006-1 ↗
6. Niknam H (2022) Sadeghzadeh-Attar A (2023) “Mg-doped TiO2 nanorods-SrTiO3 heterojunction composites for efficient visible-light photocatalytic degradation of basic yellow 28.” Opt Mater (Amst) 136:113395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11339510.1016/j.optmat.2022.113395 ↗
7. Deshmukh VV et al (2021) Structure, morphology and electrochemical properties of SrTiO3 perovskite: photocatalytic and supercapacitor applications. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 3:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2021.07.00110.1016/j.enceco.2021.07.001 ↗
8. Shao M, Ning F, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X (2014) Hierarchical nanowire arrays based on ZnO core-layered double hydroxide shell for largely enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater 24(5):580–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20130188910.1002/adfm.201301889 ↗
9. Momeni MM, Ghayeb Y (2015) Visible light-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting on ZnO–TiO2 heterogeneous nanotube photoanodes. J Appl Electrochem 45(6):557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0836-x10.1007/s10800-015-0836-x ↗
10. Lai CW, Lau KS, Abd Hamid SB (2015) Controlled growth of WO3-loaded TiO2 nanotubes for tandem solar-driven water splitting cell. Adv Mater Res 1109:243–247. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1109.24310.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1109.243 ↗
11. Hagiwara H, Higashi K, Watanabe M, Kakigi R, Ida S, Ishihara T (2016) Effect of porphyrin molecular structure on water splitting activity of a KTaO3 photocatalyst. Catalysts 6(3):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal603004210.3390/catal6030042 ↗
12. Xu D et al (2015) Ag-decorated ATaO3 (A = K, Na) nanocube plasmonic photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting properties. Langmuir 31(35):9694–9699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0129410.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01294 ↗
13. Han K et al., (2017) “Transient behavior of Ni @ NiOx Functionalized SrTiO3 in Overall Water Splitting Transient behavior of Ni @ NiO x Functionalized SrTiO 3 in Overall Wa- ter Splitting”, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b0366210.1021/acscatal.6b03662 ↗
14. Liu Y et al (2008) Synthesis and high photocatalytic hydrogen production of SrTiO3 nanoparticles from water splitting under UV irradiation. J Power Sources 183(2):701–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.05710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.057 ↗
15. Zhang Q et al (2016) Effect of redox cocatalysts location on photocatalytic overall water splitting over cubic NaTaO3 semiconductor crystals exposed with equivalent facets. ACS Catal 6(4):2182–2191. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b0250310.1021/acscatal.5b02503 ↗
16. Li Y, Gou H, Lu J, Wang C (2014) A two-step synthesis of NaTaO3 microspheres for photocatalytic water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(25):13481–13485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.02310.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.023 ↗
17. Zhu J et al (2024) Design and fabrication of a tellurite hollow-core anti-resonant fiber for mid-infrared applications. Opt Express 32(8):14067. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.51903410.1364/OE.519034 ↗
18. Long Q, Yan H, Wu H, Qiu S, Zhou X, Qiu T (2025) Influence mechanism of leaching agent anions on the leaching of aluminium impurities in ionic-type rare earth ores: a DFT simulation combined with experimental verification. Sep Purif Technol 354(P1):128768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12876810.1016/j.seppur.2024.128768 ↗
19. Gao Y, Han Z, Lu S, Pan X (2023) Influence of deposition order of dual active components on the NH3-SCO performance of the bimetallic Pt–V system supported on TiO2. New J Chem 47(23):11143–11155. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NJ01886E10.1039/D3NJ01886E ↗
20. Xiao Q, Wang K, Ma C, Chen Y (2025) Material delivery optimization for make-to-order reconfigurable job shops using an improved chaotic multi-verse algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 99:102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2025.10216710.1016/j.swevo.2025.102167 ↗
21. Zhang L et al (2025) A 3.55‐µm ultrathin, skin‐like mechanoresponsive, compliant, and seamless ionic conductive electrode for epidermal electrophysiological signal acquisition and human‐machine interaction. Exploration 5(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.2024023210.1002/EXP.20240232 ↗
22. Cheng S, Han Z, Zhao H, Li Y, Lu S (2024) A novel bifunctional Pt/Ce/WZrO catalyst for efficient selective oxidation of high-concentration NH3. Chem Eng J 479(November 2023):147876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14787610.1016/j.cej.2023.147876 ↗
23. Zhao W et al (2024) Multiobjective-Optimization MoS 2 /Cd-ZnIn 2 S 4 /CdS Composites Prepared by In Situ Structure-Tailored Technique for High-Efficiency Hydrogen Generation. Small Struct 5(7):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20230056910.1002/sstr.202300569 ↗
24. Wang J, Zhang J, Cheng G, Zhang K, Liu X (2025) Performance and mechanism of tetracycline removal by peroxymonosulfate-assisted double Z-scheme LaFeO3/g-C3N4/ZnO heterojunction under visible light drive. Environ Technol Innov 39:104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.10430210.1016/j.eti.2025.104302 ↗
25. Li N et al (2025) Review of preparation and key functional properties of micro-arc oxidation coatings on various metal substrates. Coatings 15(10):1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1510120110.3390/coatings15101201 ↗
26. Mao Y, Zhang L, Zhang C, Qin L, Liao X, Zhao L (2025) The close relationship between trace elements (Cu, Fe, Zn, Se, Rb, Si, Cr, and V) and Alzheimer’s disease: Research progress and insights. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 90:127692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2025.12769210.1016/j.jtemb.2025.127692 ↗
27. Ling Z et al (2025) Enhanced corrosion resistance of laser-remelted Fe–Cr–B–Mo alloy through interfacial periodic layered structures in liquid aluminum. J Mater Res Technol 37(July):4717–4731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.07.09610.1016/j.jmrt.2025.07.096 ↗
28. Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K (2007) A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(3):401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.00910.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009 ↗
29. Ye S, Wang R, Wu MZ, Yuan YP (2015) A review on g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. Appl Surf Sci 358:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.17310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.173 ↗
30. Huang ST, Lee WW, Chang JL, Huang WS, Chou SY, Chen CC (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis of SrTiO3 nanocubes: characterization, photocatalytic activities, and degradation pathway. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45(4):1927–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2014.02.00310.1016/j.jtice.2014.02.003 ↗
31. Aravinthkumar K, Praveen E, Mary AJ, Mohan CR (2022) Investigation on SrTiO3 nanoparticles as a photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic activity and photovoltaic applications. Inorg Chem Commun 140:109451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.10945110.1016/j.inoche.2022.109451 ↗
32. Silva F et al., (2012) “Relationship between Crystal Shape, Photoluminescence , and Local Structure in SrTiO 3 Synthesized by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method”. 2012, 25–28, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/89039710.1155/2012/890397 ↗
33. Han K et al (2021) CrOx-mediated performance enhancement of Ni/NiO-Mg:SrTiO3in photocatalytic water splitting. ACS Catal 11(17):11049–11058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c0310410.1021/acscatal.1c03104 ↗
34. Hong X et al (2021) Enhanced anti-: Escherichia coli properties of Fe-doping in MgO nanoparticles. RSC Adv 11(5):2892–2897. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09590g10.1039/d0ra09590g ↗
35. Upadhya K et al (2020) Second and third harmonic nonlinear optical process in spray pyrolysed Mg:ZnO thin films. Opt Mater (Amst) 102:109814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10981410.1016/j.optmat.2020.109814 ↗
36. Meérawa M, Tendero C, Reérat M (2001) Excited states dipole polarizabilities of calcium atom and long-range dispersion coefficients for the low-lying electronic states of Ca2 and CaMg. Chem Phys Lett 343(3–4):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00668-610.1016/S0009-2614(01)00668-6 ↗
37. Armleder J et al., (2023) “Controlling doping efficiency in organic semiconductors by tuning short-range overscreening”. Nat Commun., 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36748-x10.1038/s41467-023-36748-x ↗
38. Gardeh MG, Kistanov AA, Nguyen H, Manzano H, Cao W, Kinnunen P (2022) Exploring mechanisms of hydration and carbonation of MgO and Mg(OH)2in reactive magnesium oxide-based cements. J Phys Chem C 126(14):6196–6206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c1059010.1021/acs.jpcc.1c10590 ↗
39. Sharma A, Dhanka S, Kumar A, Maini S (2024) A comparative study of heterogeneous machine learning algorithms for arrhythmia classification using feature selection technique and multi-dimensional datasets. Eng Res Express 6(3):035209. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad5d5110.1088/2631-8695/ad5d51 ↗
40. Santhusitha D, Karunasingha K (2022) Root mean square error or mean absolute error ? Use their ratio as well. Inf Sci (Ny) 585:609–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.03610.1016/j.ins.2021.11.036 ↗
41. Sofikitou EM, Liu R, Wang H, Markatou M (2021) Distance-based estimation methods for models for discrete and mixed-scale data. Entropy 23(1):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/e2301010710.3390/e23010107 ↗
42. Nguyen VT, Jung K, Gupta V (2021) “Examining data visualization pitfalls in scientific publications”. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00092-y10.1186/s42492-021-00092-y ↗
43. Wilming R, Budding C, Müller KR, Haufe S (2022) Scrutinizing XAI using linear ground-truth data with suppressor variables. Mach Learn 111(5):1903–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-022-06167-y10.1007/s10994-022-06167-y ↗
44. Todan L et al (2023) Comparative study of MgO nanopowders prepared by different chemical methods. Gels. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels908062410.3390/gels9080624 ↗