DataVXSiliconPaper
journal article·2024-11

Enhancement of Bioactivity, Mechanical and Degradation Properties of the Diopside by Incorporation of Ba2+ Ion via Sol–gel Combustion Route

Sherlin Joseph, Sasikumar Swamiappan

Silicon· Volume 16· Issue 17
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Amini AR et al (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:363–408. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.1010.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
2. Johnell O et al (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-410.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 ↗
3. Rizzoli R et al (2013) International osteoporosis foundation committee of scientific advisors working group on cancer-induced bone disease. Cancer-associated bone disease. Osteoporos Int 24:2929–2953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2530-310.1007/s00198-013-2530-3 ↗
4. Zhao R et al (2021) Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: A review of current trends and developments. Mol 26:3007. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2610300710.3390/molecules26103007 ↗
5. Murugan R et al (2005) Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting. CSTE 65:2385–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.022 ↗
6. Narasimharaju SR et al (2022) A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends. J Manuf Process 75:375–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.033 ↗
7. Lu J et al (2018) Biological properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials for bone repair: A review. RSC Adv 8:2015–2033. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11278E10.1039/C7RA11278E ↗
8. Tang Z et al (2018) The material and biological characteristics of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics. Regen Biomater 5:43–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbx02410.1093/rb/rbx024 ↗
9. Pietak AM et al (2007) Silicon substitution in the calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomater 28:4023–4032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.003 ↗
10. Ratnayake JT et al (2017) Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends. J Biomed Mater Res B 105:1285–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3365110.1002/jbm.b.33651 ↗
11. Venkatraman SK et al (2020) Review on calcium-and magnesium-based silicates for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 108:1546–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3692510.1002/jbm.a.36925 ↗
12. Zhou H et al (2021) Magnesium-based biomaterials as emerging agents for bone repair and regeneration: From mechanism to application. J Magnes Alloy 9:779–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.00410.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004 ↗
13. Liu Z et al (2023) Advances in the use of calcium silicate-based materials in bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 49:19355–19363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.06310.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.063 ↗
14. Youness RA et al (2023) A review on calcium silicate ceramics: properties, limitations, and solutions for their use in biomedical applications. Silicon 15:2493–2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02207-310.1007/s12633-022-02207-3 ↗
15. Srinath P et al (2020) Review on calcium silicate-based bioceramics in bone tissue engineering. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17:2450–2464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1357710.1111/ijac.13577 ↗
16. Choudhary R et al (2016) In-vitro bioactivity, biocompatibility and dissolution studies of diopside prepared from biowaste by using sol–gel combustion method. Mater Sci Eng C 68:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.11010.1016/j.msec.2016.04.110 ↗
17. Razavi M et al (2014) In vivo study of nanostructured diopside (CaMgSi2O6) coating on magnesium alloy as biodegradable orthopedic implants. Appl Surf Sci 313:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.13010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.130 ↗
18. Hosseini R et al (2017) Reinforcement of electrospun poly (ε‐caprolactone) pellet using diopside nanopowder to promote biological and physical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 134. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4443310.1002/app.44433 ↗
19. Nonami T et al (1999) Study of diopside ceramics for biomaterials. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 10:475–479. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100899690879710.1023/A:1008996908797 ↗
20. Choudhary R et al (2015) Bioactivity studies of calcium magnesium silicate prepared from eggshell waste by sol–gel combustion synthesis. J Asian Ceram Soc 3(2):173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2015.01.00210.1016/j.jascer.2015.01.002 ↗
21. Iwata NY (2004) Sintering behavior and apatite formation of diopside prepared by coprecipitation process. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 34:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.01.00710.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.01.007 ↗
22. Python M et al (2007) Trace element heterogeneity in hydrothermal diopside: evidence for Ti depletion and Sr-Eu-LREE enrichment during hydrothermal metamorphism of mantle harzburgite. J Miner Petrol Sci 102:143–149. https://doi.org/10.2465/jmps.06083010.2465/jmps.060830 ↗
23. Bozadjiev L et al (2006) Methods for diopside synthesis. J Univ Chem Technol Metallurgy 41:125–128. https://journal.uctm.edu/node/j2006-2/02-l.bozadjiev.pdf
24. Choudhary R et al (2021) Biomineralization, dissolution and cellular studies of silicate bioceramics prepared from eggshell and rice husk. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11145610.1016/j.msec.2020.111456 ↗
25. Choudhary R et al (2019) Biomineralization, antibacterial activity and mechanical properties of biowaste derived diopside nanopowders. Adv Powder Technol 30:1950–1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2019.06.01410.1016/j.apt.2019.06.014 ↗
26. Joseph S et al (2024) Preparation and characterization of diopside-wollastonite composite for orthopedic application. Silicon 16:1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02737-410.1007/s12633-023-02737-4 ↗
27. Venkatraman SK et al (2022) Comparative investigation on antibacterial, biological and mechanical behaviour of monticellite and diopside derived from biowaste for bone regeneration. Mater Chem Phys 286:126157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12615710.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126157 ↗
28. Stanić V et al (2010) Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of copper and zinc-doped hydroxyapatite nanopowders. Appl Surf Sci 256:6083–6089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.12410.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.124 ↗
29. Namdar A et al (2023) Advances in ion-doping of Ca-Mg silicate bioceramics for bone tissue engineering. Coord Chem Rev 478:215001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21500110.1016/j.ccr.2022.215001 ↗
30. Baghjeghaz MJ et al (2017) Enhanced sinterability and in vitro bioactivity of diopside through fluoride doping. Ceram Int 43(2017):4680–4686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.14410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.144 ↗
31. Shahrouzifar MR et al (2019) Co-incorporation of strontium and fluorine into diopside pellets: bioactivity, biodegradation and cytocompatibility evaluations. Mater Sci Eng C 103:109752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.10975210.1016/j.msec.2019.109752 ↗
32. Shahrouzifar MR et al (2019) Strontium doping into diopside tissue engineering pellets. Ceram Int 45:10176–10181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.06710.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.067 ↗
33. Rahmani H et al (2018) Incorporation of monovalent cations into diopside to improve biomineralization and cytocompatibility. Ceram Int 44(2018):19200–19206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.140 ↗
34. Su YH et al (2021) Rare earth element cerium substituted Ca–Si–Mg system bioceramics: From mechanism to mechanical and degradation properties. Ceram Int 47:19414–19423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.27810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.278 ↗
35. Sadeghzade S et al (2022) Recent advances on bioactive baghdadite ceramic for bone tissue engineering applications: 20 years of research and innovation (a review). Mater Today Bio 17:100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.10047310.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100473 ↗
36. Alshemary AZ et al (2015) Barium and fluorine doped synthetic hydroxyapatite: characterization and in-vitro bioactivity analysis. Sci Adv Mater 7:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2015.210310.1166/sam.2015.2103 ↗
37. Myat-Htun et al (2020) Enhanced sinterability and in vitro bioactivity of barium-doped akermanite ceramic. Ceram Int 46:19062–19068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.23810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.238 ↗
38. Shobana K et al (2023) Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro bioactivity, mechanical strength of silver doped akermanite bioceramic. Inorg Chem Commun 148:110347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.11034710.1016/j.inoche.2022.110347 ↗
39. Naceur H et al (2014) Effect of sintering temperature on microstructure and electrical properties of Sr 1–x (Na 0.5 Bi 0.5) x Bi 2 Nb 2 O 9 solid solutions. J Adv Ceram 3:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-014-0089-x10.1007/s40145-014-0089-x ↗
40. Klein C et al (2013) Earth materials: introduction to mineralogy and petrology. Cambridge University Press
41. Misra KC et al (2012) Introduction to geochemistry: principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons
42. Ardit M (2012) Melilite-type and melilite-related compounds: structural variations along the join Sr 2–x Ba x MgSi 2 O 7 (0≤ x≤ 2) and high-pressure behavior of the two end-members. Phys Chem Miner 39:199–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-011-0475-710.1007/s00269-011-0475-7 ↗
43. Joseph S et al (2022) Investigation on the compatibility of forsterite for tissue engineering application. Mater Lett 308:13118810.1016/j.matlet.2021.131188 ↗
44. Joseph S et al (2023) Biomineralization and mechanical studies of sodium substituted hydroxyapatite by a time-saving combustion route. ChemSelect 8:202302660. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20230266010.1002/slct.202302660 ↗
45. Vijayakumar N et al (2023) Optimization of metal ion/fuel ratio for an effective combustion of monticellite and investigation of its microbial and hemolytic activity for biomedical applications. ACS Omega 8:36919–36932. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0398410.1021/acsomega.3c03984 ↗
46. Okii N et al (2001) In Vivo histological changes occurring in hydroxyapatite cranial reconstruction—case report—. Neurol Med Chir 41:100–104. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.41.10010.2176/nmc.41.100 ↗
47. Freyman TM et al (2001) Cellular materials as porous pellets for tissue engineering. Prog Mater Sci 46:273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00018-910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00018-9 ↗
48. Ohtsuki C et al (1992) Mechanism of apatite formation on CaOSiO2P2O5 glasses in a simulated body fluid. J Non-Cryst Solids 143:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80556-310.1016/S0022-3093(05)80556-3 ↗
49. Gerhardt LC et al (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic pellets for bone tissue engineering. Mater 3:3867–3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma307386710.3390/ma3073867 ↗