journal article·2023-11

Effect of Multidirectional Forging and SIMA Process on Mechanical and Tribological Behavior of Hypereutectic Al-18 Wt.% Si Alloy

Ishwari Narain Choudhary, Nitesh Kumar Sinha, Manik Mahali, Jayant Kumar Singh

Silicon· Volume 15· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

In the present work microstructure, mechanical and tribological characteristics of Al-18 wt.% Si alloy produced using the traditional gravity casting, multidirectional forged (MDF) at 300 °C, and strain-induced melt activation (SIMA) processed samples have been studied and compared. Physical and chemical characterization of all sample have been done through X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), mechanical and tribological properties such as tensile strength, % elongation, hardness, density, porosity, wear rate, and coefficient of friction were investigated. It was observed that SIMA processed sample having a microstructure made up of globular α-Al grains and primary Si particles in place of dendrite and acicular phase. Optimized SIMA processed sample (HT 2) having 10% higher hardness value than cast and 5% higher than MDF samples, similarly tensile strength and % elongation having 40% and 8% higher value as compare to cast and 30% and 4% higher than the MDF sample due to refinement of primary Si, eutectic phase and spherical morphology. Fractograph observation indicate that fracture mode shifted from brittle to ductile mode. Wear rate increases and coefficient of friction (COF) decreases as we increase the static normal load (SNL) and sliding velocity (SV), in case of all samples but SIMA processed sample having lower wear rate and COF as compare to cast and MDF.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Jiang H, Yalin L, Huang W, Li X, Li M (2003) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the semisolid Al–4Cu–Mg alloy. Mater Charact 51:1–1010.1016/S1044-5803(03)00128-1 ↗
2. Young Buem Song, Kyung-Tae Park and Chun Pyo Hong, “Recrystallization Behavior of 7175 Al Alloy during Modified Strain-Induced Melt-Activated (SIMA) Process. Mater Trans”, Vol. 47, No. 4 (2006) pp. 1250 to 125610.2320/matertrans.47.1250 ↗
3. Sahoo KL, Poddar P, Kumar R, Pushp PT (2009) Strain induced melt activation – an effective route to produce high performance alloy plates and sheets. Trans Indian Inst Metals 62:275–27810.1007/s12666-009-0041-x ↗
4. Fadavi Boostani A, Tahamtan S (2009) Fracture behavior of thixoformed A356 alloy produced by SIMA process. J Alloys Compd 481:220–22710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.050 ↗
5. Emamya M, Razaghian A, Karshenas M (2013) The effect of strain-induced melt activation process on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-refined A6070 Al alloy. Mater Des 46:824–83110.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.060 ↗
6. Alipour M, Emamy M, Farsani RE, Saidati MH, Khorsand H (2015) Effect of a modified SIMA Process on the structure, hardness and mechanical properties of Al-12Zn-3Mg-2.5Cu Alloy.” Iran J Mater Sci Eng 12(4):77–88
7. Lin C-W, Hung F-Y, Lui T-S (2018) Microstructure Evolution and Microstructural Characteristics of Al–Mg–Si Aluminum Alloys Fabricated by a Modified Strain-Induced Melting Activation Process.” MDPI, Metals 8(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/met801000310.3390/met8010003 ↗
8. Flemings MC (1991) Behavior of metal alloys in the semi-solid state. Metall Trans A 22A:957–98110.1007/BF02661090 ↗
9. Kirkwood DH (1994) Semisolid metal processing. Int Mater Rev 39(5):17310.1179/imr.1994.39.5.173 ↗
10. Alipour M, Emamy M, Seyed Ebrahimi SH, Azarbarmas M, Karamouz M, Rassizadehghani J (2011) Effects of pre-deformation and heat treatment conditions in the SIMA process on properties of an Al–Zn–mg–cu alloy modified by Al–8B grain refiner. Mater Sci Eng A 528:448210.1016/j.msea.2011.02.026 ↗
11. Alipour M, Emamy M (2011) Effects of Al–5Ti–1B on the structure and hardness of a super high strength aluminum alloy produced by strain-induced melt activation process. Mater Des 32:448510.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.044 ↗
12. Song YB, Park K, Hong CP (2006) Recrystallization behavior of 7175 Al alloy during modified strain-induced melt-activated (SIMA) process. Mater Trans 47:1250–125610.2320/matertrans.47.1250 ↗
13. Kapranos P (1994) Semi-solid metal processing: an environmentally friendly process. Mater World 10:465–467
14. Sang-Yong L, Jung-Hwan L, Young-Seon L (2001) Characterization of Al 7075 alloys after cold working and heating in the semi-solid temperature range. J Mater Process Technol 111:42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00494-010.1016/S0924-0136(01)00494-0 ↗
15. Sinha K N, Choudhary N I, Singh K J (2021) “Influence of Mold material on the Mold stability for foundry use” Silicon10.1007/s12633-021-01070-y ↗
16. Luo S, Tian W, Zhang G (2001) Structural evolution of LC4 alloy in making thixotropic billet by SIMA method. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 11:547–550
17. Tzimas E, Zavaliangos A (2000) Evolution of near-equiaxed microstructure in the semi-solid state. Mater Sci Eng A 289:228–24010.1016/S0921-5093(00)00908-4 ↗
18. Numsarapatnuk S, Chayong S (2013) Semi-solid process of 2024 wrought aluminum alloy by strain induced melt activation. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 35(5):569–577
19. Sinha K N, Choudhary N I, Singh K J (2020) “Utilization of industrial solid waste as a mold material in the foundry industry” Materials Today: Proceedings 46, pp.1492–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.74810.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.748 ↗
20. Gupta M, Ling SS (1999) Microstructure and mechanical properties of hypo/ hyper-eutectic Al–Si alloys synthesized using a near-net shape forming technique. J Alloys Compd 287:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00062-610.1016/S0925-8388(99)00062-6 ↗
21. Ram S, Chattopadhyay K, Chakrabarty I (2019) Microstructures and high temperature mechanical properties of A356-Mg2Si functionally graded composites in as-cast and artificially aged (T6) conditions. J Alloys Compd 805:454–47010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.075 ↗
22. Gupta M, Lai M, Saravanaranganathans D (2000) Synthesis, microstructure and properties characterization of disintegrated melt deposited mg/SiC composites. J Mater Sci 35:2155–216510.1023/A:1004706321731 ↗
23. Hussain Z, Mufadi A, Subbarayan A, Irfan O (2011) Microstructure and mechanical properties investigation on nanostructured nickel 200 alloy using multi-axial forging. Mater Charact 62:61–672
24. Sivasankaran S, Sivaprasad K, Narayanasamy R, Satyanarayana PV (2011) X-ray peak broadening analysis of AA 6061100 −x−x wt% Al2O3 nanocomposite prepared by mechanical alloying. Mater Charact 62:61–67210.1016/j.matchar.2011.04.017 ↗
25. Ming W, Lanping H, Wensheng L, Yunzhu M, Boyun H (2016) Influence of cumulative strain on microstructure and mechanical properties of multi-directional forged 2A14 aluminum alloy. Mater Scie Eng A 674:40–5110.1016/j.msea.2016.07.072 ↗
26. Jandaghi MR, Pouraliakbar H, Khalaj G, Khalaj MJ, Heridarzadeh A (2016) Study on the post-rolling direction of severely plastic deformed aluminum-manganese-silicon alloy. Arch Civ Mech Eng 16:87610.1016/j.acme.2016.06.005 ↗
27. Tash M, Samuel F, Mucciardi F, Doty H (2007) Effect of metallurgical parameters on the hardness and microstructural characterization of as-cast and heat-treated 356 and 319 aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 443:185–20110.1016/j.msea.2006.08.054 ↗
28. Gall K,Yang N, Horstemeyer M, Mcdowell D, Fanthe J (1999) “Debonding and fracture of Si particles during the fatigue of a cast Al-Si alloy”, Metall Mater Trans A, Volume 30a10.1007/s11661-999-0218-2 ↗
29. Feyzullaholu E, Ertürk TA (2013) Asim GÜVEN E, “ influence of forging and heat treatment on wear properties of Al-Si and Al-Pb bearing alloys in oil lubricated conditions” trans. Nonferrous Met Soc China 23:3575–3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62903-910.1016/S1003-6326(13)62903-9 ↗
30. Ozdemir I, Cocen U, Onel K (2000) The effect of forging on the properties of particulate-SiC-reinforced aluminium-alloy composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:411–41910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00140-2 ↗
31. Yousefi D, Taghiabadi R, Shaerie MH (2021) Effect of multi-pass multi-directional forging on tribological properties of Si-rich eutectoid ZA alloys. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 31:2024–203810.1016/S1003-6326(21)65635-2 ↗
32. Haque MM, Sharif A (2001) Study on wear properties of aluminium–silicon piston alloy. J Mater Process Technol 118:69–7310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00869-X ↗
33. Alipour M, Emami M, Eslami Farsania R, Siadati HM, Khorsand H (2015) Effects of a modified Sima process on the structure, hardness and mechanical properties of al-12zn-3mg-2.5cu alloy. IJMSE 12(4):77–88
34. Hafiz MF, Kobayashi T (1994) A study on the microstructure-fracture behavior relations in al-si casting alloys. Scr Metall 30:475–48010.1016/0956-716X(94)90606-8 ↗
35. (1996) Fracture toughness of eutectic Al-Si casting alloy with different microstructural features. J Mater Sci 31:6195–620010.1007/BF00354438 ↗
36. Xu LC, Yang FY, Wang YH, Jiang CQ (2007) Effects of modification and heat-treatment on the abrasive wear behavior of hypereutectic Al–Si alloys. J Mater Sci 42:6331–6338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1189-y10.1007/s10853-006-1189-y ↗
37. Stolarz J, Foct J (2001) Specific features of two phase alloys response to cyclic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A319–321:501–50510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01077-2 ↗
38. Pedersen L, Arnberg L (2001) “The effect of solution heat treatment and quenching rates on mechanical properties and microstructures in AlSiMg foundry alloys.” Metall Mater Trans A volume 32a, —52510.1007/s11661-001-0069-y ↗
39. Venkateswarlu K (1996) Influence of the size and morphology of silicon particles on the physical, mechanical and tribological properties of some aluminium – silicon alloys. J Mater Sci Lett 15:1773–177610.1007/BF00275338 ↗
40. Archard, J. (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8):981–988. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.172144810.1063/1.1721448 ↗