journal article·2022-01

Thermal Conductivity and Strength Properties of Nanosilica and GGBS Incorporated Concrete Specimens

L. Sai Indrasena Reddy, M. M. Vijayalakshmi, T. R. Praveenkumar

Silicon· Volume 14· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

An important property which affects the heat transfer process in buildings and to minimize the usage of artificial energy in buildings is thermal conductivity. The transfer of heat through walls and roofs determines the amount of artificial energy required in the buildings. The conventional methods used to determine the thermal conductivity of buildings are transient and steady state methods. The objective of this paper is to measure the thermal conductivity of concrete specimens replacing nanosilica and GGBS by weight of ordinary Portland cement. Nanosilica was replaced by weight of cement in different proportions ranging from 1% to 5%. Addition of nanosilica and GGBS in concrete improves the compressive strength and split tensile strength of concrete by around 10%. Improvement in strength properties is mainly due to densification of concrete microstructure by filling pores in concrete specimens. In addition to the strength characteristics, nanosilica incorporated concrete specimens showed better thermal resistance as compared with conventional concrete mix. Lower heat transfer rate is due to the better particle packing nature of nanoparticles in concrete. Nanosilica acts as better heat retarding agent in concrete and thus it minimizes the use of artificial energy in the buildings. It is concluded that utilization of nanosilica reduces the heat transfer rate in to the buildings and the optimum amount of nanosilica was found to be 3% by weight of cement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Palla R, Karade SR, Mishra G, Sharma U, Singh LP (2017) High strength sustainable concrete using silica nanoparticles. Constr Build Mater 138:285–29510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.129 ↗
2. Kahn, J. (2006), Nanotechnology. Natl Geogr, 98–11910.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03949.x ↗
3. White SR, Sottos NR, Moore J, Geubelle P, Kessler M, Brown E et al (2000) Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 409:794–79710.1038/35057232 ↗
4. Praveenkumar TR, Vijayalakshmi MM (2015) Effect of Nano particles on the properties of concrete. Int J Chemtech 8(7):50–55
5. Murthi P, Poongodi K, Awoyera PO, Gobinath R, Saravanan R (2020) Enhancing the strength properties of high-performance concrete using ternary blended cement: OPC. Nano-silica, bagasse ash. Silicon 12:1949–1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00324-010.1007/s12633-019-00324-0 ↗
6. Ronzhya YR, Praveenkumar TR (2015) Durability study of self compacting concrete using hybrid glass Fibres. Int J ChemTech Res 8(2):836–844
7. Kirthika K, Praveen Kumar TR (2015) Experimental investigation Onflexural behaviour of glass beams with stainless steel. Int J ChemTech Res 8(7):434–443
8. Praveenkumar TR, Vijayalakshmi MM (2019) Microstructural properties of nano-rice husk ash concrete. Nanotechnol Environ Eng 4:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-019-0056-410.1007/s41204-019-0056-4 ↗
9. Meddah MS, Praveenkumar TR, Vijayalakshmi MM, Manigandan S, Arunachalam R (2020) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of rice husk ash and Al2O3 nanoparticles modified cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 255:11935810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119358 ↗
10. Praveenkumar TR, Vijayalakshmi M, Manigandan M (2019) Thermal conductivity of concrete reinforced using TiO2 nanoparticles and rice husk ash. Int J Ambient Ener. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.169164910.1080/01430750.2019.1691649 ↗
11. Kumar R, Mathur R, Mishra AK (2011) Opportunities & challenges for use of nanotechnology in cement-based materials , NBMCW
12. Drexler KE (1986) Engine of creation. Anchor Book Edition, N.Y
13. Deb B-W (2008) Nanotechnology: ethics and society. Taylor and Francis Group, N.Y
14. Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete - A review. Constr Build Mat 24(11):2060–207110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014 ↗
15. Sobolev K, Ferrada-Gutiérrez M (2005) How nanotechnology can change the concrete world: part 2. Am Ceramic Soc Bull 11:16–19
16. Mohseni E, Naseri F, Amjadi R, Khotbehsara MM, Ranjbar MM (2016) Microstructure and durability properties of cement mortars containing nano-TiO2 and rice husk ash. Constr Build Mater 114:656–66410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.136 ↗
17. Najigivi A, Khaloo A, Irajizad A, Rashid SA (2013) Investigating the effects of using different types of SiO2 nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of binary blended concrete, composites. Part B 54:52–5810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.035 ↗
18. Lin DF, Lin KL, Chang WC, Luo HL, Cai MQ (2008) Improvements of nano-SiO2 on sludge/fly ash mortar. Waste Manag 28(6):1081–108710.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.023 ↗
19. Patel K (2012) The use of nanoclay as a constructional material. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2(2):1382–1386
20. Morsy MS, Alsayed SH, Aqel M (2011) Hybrid effect of carbon nanotube and nano clay on physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 25:145–14910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.046 ↗
21. Wang W-C (2017) Compressive strength and thermal conductivity of concrete with nanoclay under various high-temperatures. Constr Build Mater 147:305–31110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.141 ↗
22. Mukharjee BB, Barai SV (2014) Influence of nano-silica on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 55:29–3710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.003 ↗
23. Ying J, Zhou B (2017) Jianzhuang XiaoPore structure and chloride diffusivity of recycled aggregate concrete with nano-SiO2 and nano-TiO2. Constr Build Mater 150:49–5510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.168 ↗
24. Wang WJ, Wu J, Wang Z, Wu GZ, Yue AY (2016) Chloride diffusion coefficient of recycled aggregate concrete under compressive loading. Mater Struct 49(11):4729–473610.1617/s11527-016-0830-8 ↗
25. Niewiadomskia P, Stefaniuk D, Hołaa J (2017) Microstructural analysis of self-compacting concrete modified with the addition of nanoparticles. Procedia Eng 172:776–78310.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.122 ↗
26. Patel R, Patel C (2016) Pratik Patel a review paper on measure thermal conductivity. JETIR 3(2):51–53
27. Kim K, Jeon S, Kim J, Yang S (2003) An experimental study on thermal conductivity of concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(3):363–37110.1016/S0008-8846(02)00965-1 ↗
28. Khan MI (2002) Factors affecting the thermal properties of concrete and applicability of its prediction models. Build Environ 37(6):607–61410.1016/S0360-1323(01)00061-0 ↗
29. Campbell-Allen D, Thorne CP (1963) The thermal conductivity of concrete. Mag Concr Res 15(43):39–4810.1680/macr.1963.15.43.39 ↗
30. Harmathy TZ (1970) Thermal properties of concrete at elevated temperature. J Mater 5(1):47–74
31. Harmathy TZ, Allen LW (1973) Thermal properties of selected masonry unit concretes. ACI J Proc 70(2):132–142
32. WeipingZhang HM, Gu X, Xi Y, Xing Y (2015) Mesoscale model for thermal conductivity of concrete. Constr Build Mat 98:8–1610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.106 ↗
33. Asadi I, Shafigh P, Hassan ZFBA (2018) Norhayati Binti Mahyuddin, thermal conductivity of concrete - a review. J Build Eng 20:81–9310.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.002 ↗
34. Oner A, Akyuz S (2007) An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 29(6):505–51410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.01.001 ↗
35. BS EN 12390–3: 2009, Testing hardened concrete—part 3 compressive strength of tests specimens, British Standards Institution, London
36. IS 5816 1999(R2004), Method of Test Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, India