journal article·2019-02

Application of Genetic Algorithm Optimization Technique in TIG Welding of 15CDV6 Aerospace Steel

L. Srinivasan, Mohammad Chand Khan, T. Deepan Bharathi Kannan, P. Sathiya, S. Biju

Silicon· Volume 11· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, an attempt is made to identify the optimized parameter combinations in TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding of 15CDV6 steel. 15CDV6 is a high strength low alloy steel which is widely used in aerospace industries. TIG welding was carried out on 15CDV6 steel with current, voltage, welding speed, shielding gas flow rate as input parameters. Tensile strength, hardness, and corrosion current density were measured as performance characteristics. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was used as modeling technique for predicting the output parameters. Four different learning algorithms, viz. Batch Back Propagation (BBP), Quick Propagation (QP), Incremental Back Propagation (IBP), Legvenberg- Marquardt (LM) back propagation were used to train the model, and it was found that legvenberg- Marquardt (LM) as the best learning algorithm concerning the prediction accuracy. Genetic algorithm (GA) optimization technique was used to identify the optimized parameter combinations, and a confirmation test was carried out with GA predicted optimized parameters. The confirmation test results were in good agreement with GA results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Bandyopadhyay TR, Rao PK, Prabhu N (2011) ISRN Mat Sci 1:1–7
2. Sapthagiri S, Jayathirtha Rao K, Ashok Reddy K, Sharada Prabhakar C (2015) IJARF 2(5):16–20
3. Neelamegam C, Vardhan Sapineni V, Muthukumaran V, Tamana J (2013) J Intell Learn Syst Appl 5:39
4. Indhumathi SN, Vasudevan T, Sundarajan S, Subba Rao BV (2011) Met Finish 109:1510.1016/S0026-0576(11)00010-9 ↗
5. Deepan Bharathi Kannan T, Ramesh T, Sathiya P (2016), Trans Indian Inst Met. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0973-x10.1007/s12666-016-0973-x ↗
6. Katherasan D, Elias JV, Sathiya P, Noorul Haq A (2012) J Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0675-010.1007/s10845-012-0675-0 ↗
7. Deepan Bharathi Kannan T, Rajesh Kannan G, Suresh Kumar B, Baskar N (2014) Proc Mat Sci 5:2242
8. Park H, Rhee S (1999) J Laser Appl 11(3):14310.2351/1.521890 ↗
9. Sathiya P, Panneerselvam K, Abdul Jaleel MY (2012) Mat Des 36:49010.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.028 ↗
10. Park YW, Rhee S (2008) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:101410.1007/s00170-007-1039-3 ↗
11. Hayajneh MT, Hassan AM, Mayyas AT (2009) J All Comput 478:55910.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.155 ↗
12. Kamal Babu K, Panneerselvam K, Sathiya P, Noorul Haq A, Sundarrajan S, Mastanaiah P, Srinivasa Murthy CV (2017) Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0897-610.1007/s00170-017-0897-6 ↗
13. Zhao D, Ren D, Zhao K, Pan S, Guoa X (2017) J Manuf Proc 30:6310.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.009 ↗
14. Rong Y, Zhou Q, Huang Y, Chang Y, Zhang G, Shao X (2016) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:123910.1007/s00170-015-8028-8 ↗
15. Wang Z-H, Gong D-Y, Li X, Li G-T, Zhang D-H (2017) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:332510.1007/s00170-017-0711-5 ↗
16. Zhanga K, Chena Y, Zhenga J, Huanga J, Tanga X (2017) J Manuf Proc 30:55310.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.025 ↗