journal article·2023-08

Improvements in Morpho-Anatomical Traits of Adventitious Roots of Hedyotis biflora (L.) Lam. using Silicon Nanoparticles

M. Manokari, M. Cokul Raj, Abhijit Dey, Mohammad Faisal, Abdulrahman A. Alatar, Nirmal Joshee, Mahipal S. Shekhawat

Silicon· Volume 15· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

The poor rooting of in vitro-raised shootlets is a major bottleneck and severely affects the survival rate of plantlets in field conditions. Hedyotis biflora is used as a model plant to study the impact of Silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) on in vitro adventitious root formation and their structural developments in this study. The in vitro proliferated shootlets cultured on ½ strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 2.0 mg L−1 indole-3 butyric acid (IBA) and 3.0 mg L−1 SiNPs promoted the morpho-anatomical improvements in roots. Morphologically, the roots of SiNPs treatment were significantly superior, thick, and sturdy with increased biomass (1.298 g fresh weight and 0.614 g dry weight) and more in numbers (33.0 roots with 5.0 cm average length) from that of the fragile control roots (21.0 roots with 3.8 cm average length with reduced biomass of 0.735 g FW and 0.319 g DW). Light microscopic monitoring of roots revealed that SiNPs-derived roots were fully differentiated into periderm, exodermis, and secondary cortex and vascular tissues. Such structures were absent and only primary structures were detected in the control roots (derived from the medium without SiNPs). It was observed that the proportion of secondary xylem was significantly higher in the SiNPs-treated roots than the control roots, which correlated positively with the adaptation of roots toward field conditions. Furthermore, the acclimatization efficiency and survival of SiNPs-derived plantlets were higher (100%) relative to the control plantlets (91.0%). The present findings demonstrate that SiNPs mediated anatomical traits facilitated the adaptation of micropropagated plantlets of H. biflora to the ex vitro/in vivo environments, allowing them to survive successfully post-transplantation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Effects in Agriculture · Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals · Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Tomar PC, Kalrs T, Ahuja G, Taneja S (2018) Plants emerging with promising nanoworld. BioTechnologia 99(2):165–179. https://doi.org/10.5114/bta.2018.7566010.5114/bta.2018.75660 ↗
2. Tymoszuk A, Miler N (2019) Silver and gold nanoparticles impact on in vitro adventitious organogenesis in chrysanthemum, gerbera and Cape Primrose. Sci Hortic 257:108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.10876610.1016/j.scienta.2019.108766 ↗
3. Bapat G, Zinjarde S, Tamhane V (2020) Evaluation of silica nanoparticle mediated delivery of protease inhibitor in tomato plants and its effect on insect pest Helicoverpa armigera. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11107910.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111079 ↗
4. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds Mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci 21(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.04.00510.1016/j.sjbs.2013.04.005 ↗
5. Cokul Raj M, Manokari M, Arumugam N, Dey A, Faisal M, Alatar AA, Alok A, Shekhawat MS (2023) Silicon nanoparticles mediated in vitro flowering and study of pollen viability in Vitex negundo L. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02397-410.1007/s12633-023-02397-4 ↗
6. Mukarram M, Khan MMA, Corpas FJ (2021) Silicon nanoparticles elicit an increase in lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus (Steud.) Wats) agronomic parameters with a higher essential oil yield. J Hazard Mater 412:125254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12525410.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125254 ↗
7. Soundararajan P, Manivannan A, Cho YS, Jeong BR (2017) Exogenous supplementation of silicon improved the recovery of hyperhydric shoots in Dianthus caryophyllus L. by stabilizing the physiology and protein expression. Front Plant Sci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0073810.3389/fpls.2017.00738 ↗
8. Asgari F, Majd A, Jonoubi P, Najafi F (2018) Effects of silicon nanoparticles on molecular, chemical, structural and ultrastructural characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 127:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.02110.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.021 ↗
9. Neupane S, Dessein S, Wikstrom N, Lewis PO, Long C, Bremer B, Motley TJ (2015) The Hedyotis-Oldenlandia complex (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae) in Asia and the Pacific: Phylogeny revisited with new generic delimitations. Taxon 64:299–32210.12705/642.8 ↗
10. Siva R (2010) Plant dyes. In: Singh B (ed) Industrial Crop and Uses. CAB Publications, Wallingford, UK, pp 349–35710.1079/9781845936167.0349 ↗
11. Siva R, Mayes S, Behera SK, Rajasekaran C (2012) Anthraquinones dye production using root cultures of Oldenlandia umbellata L. Ind Crops Prod 37(1):415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.02710.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.027 ↗
12. Wong CT, Taichi M, Nishio H, Nishiuchi Y, Tam JP (2011) Optimal oxidative folding of the novel antimicrobial cyclotide from Hedyotis biflora requires high alcohol concentrations. Biochem 50:7275–728310.1021/bi2007004 ↗
13. Sridhar N, Kumar NVSP, Sasidhar D, Venkatesh AK, Kanthal LK (2012) Antibacterial and phytochemical evaluation of Oldenlandia biflora L. and Pergularia daemia. Int J Drug Devel Res 4:148–152
14. Nguyen GK, Zhang S, Wang W, Wong CT, Nguyen NT, Tam JP (2011) Discovery of a linear cyclotide from the bracelet subfamily and its di-sulfide mapping by top-down mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 286:44833–44844. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.29029610.1074/jbc.M111.290296 ↗
15. Ding XM, Bai DS, Qian JJ (2014) Novel cyclotides from Hedyotis biflora inhibit proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer cell in vitro and in vivo. J Med Chem Res 23:1406–141310.1007/s00044-013-0746-6 ↗
16. Corbineau F, Come D (1980) Some particularities of the germination of Oldenlandia corymbosa L. seeds. Israel J Bot 29:157–167
17. Shekhawat MS, Kannan N, Manokari M, Revathi J (2013) Induction of shoots from in vitro cultured roots of Oldenlandia umbellata L. a dye-yielding plant. Res J Pharm Phytochem 5:22–25
18. Revathi J, Manokari M, Latha R, Priyadharshini S, Kher MM, Shekhawat MS (2019) In vitro propagation, in vitro flowering, ex vitro root regeneration and foliar micro-morphological analysis of Hedyotis biflora (Linn.) Lam. Vegetos 32:609–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00066-910.1007/s42535-019-00066-9 ↗
19. Devi J, Kumar R, Singh K, Gehlot A, Bhushan S, Kumar S (2021) In vitro adventitious roots: a non-disruptive technology for the production of phytoconstituents on the industrial scale. Crit Rev Biotechnol 41:564–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.186969010.1080/07388551.2020.1869690 ↗
20. Krishnan SS, Siril E (2018) Elicitor mediated adventitious root culture for the large-scale production of anthraquinones from Oldenlandia umbellata L. Ind Crops Prod 114:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.06910.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.069 ↗
21. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–49710.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x ↗
22. Attia EA, Elhawat N (2021) Combined foliar and soil application of silica nanoparticles enhances the growth, flowering period and flower characteristics of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Sci Hort 282:110015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.11001510.1016/j.scienta.2021.110015 ↗
23. Johansen DA (1940) Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
24. Sass JE (1940) Elements of Botanical Microtechnique. McFraw-Hill Book Co, New York and London, p 222
25. Martins D, Nunez CV (2015) Secondary metabolites from Rubiaceae species. Molecules 20(7):13422–13495. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20071342210.3390/molecules200713422 ↗
26. Wang Y, Wang C, Lin H, Liu Y, Li Y, Zhao Y, Li P, Liu J (2018) Discovery of the potential biomarkers for discrimination between Hedyotis diffusa and Hedyotis corymbosa by UPLC-QTOF/MS metabolome analysis. Molecules 23(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2307152510.3390/molecules23071525 ↗
27. Malik MS, Alsantali RI, Jassas RS, Alsimaree AA, Syed R, Alsharif MA, Kalpana K, Morad M, Althagafi II, Ahmed SA (2021) Journey of anthraquinones as anticancer agents – a systematic review of recent literature. RSC Adv 11(57):35806–35827. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra05686g10.1039/d1ra05686g ↗
28. Kannan N, Manokari M, Shekhawat MS (2020) Enhanced production of anthraquinones and phenolic compounds using chitosan from the adventitious roots of Morinda coreia Buck. and Ham. Ind Crops Prod 148:112321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11232110.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112321 ↗
29. Leite MS, Pinto TEF, Centofante AR, Neto AR, Silva FG, Selari PJRG, Martins PF (2021) Acclimatization of Pouteria gardeneriana Radlk micropropagated plantlets: Role of in vitro rooting and plant growth–promoting bacteria. Curr Plant Biol 27:100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2021.10020910.1016/j.cpb.2021.100209 ↗
30. Arab MM, Yadollahi A, Eftekhari M, Ahmadi H, Akbari M, Khorami SS (2018) Modeling and optimizing a new culture medium for in vitro rooting of G×N15 Prunus rootstock using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm. Sci Rep 8(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27858-410.1038/s41598-018-27858-4 ↗
31. Manokari M, Priyadharshini S, Shekhawat M (2021) Micro-structural stability of micropropagated plants of Vitex negundo L. Microsc Microanal 27(3):626–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192762100028310.1017/S1431927621000283 ↗
32. Shekhawat MS, Mehta SR, Manokari M, Priyadharshini S, Badhepuri MK, Jogam P, Dey A, Rajput BS (2021) Morpho-anatomical and physiological changes of Indian Sandalwood (Santalum album L.) plantlets in ex vitro conditions to support successful acclimatization for plant mass production. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 147:423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02136-w10.1007/s11240-021-02136-w ↗
33. George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJD (2008) The anatomy and morphology of tissue cultured plants. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJD (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture. Dordrecht: Springer. pp 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5005-3_1310.1007/978-1-4020-5005-3_13 ↗
34. Sivanesan I, Park SW (2014) The role of silicon in plant tissue culture. Front Plant Sci 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.0057110.3389/fpls.2014.00571 ↗
35. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Kumar D, Chauhan DK (2012) Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol Plant 34(1):279–28910.1007/s11738-011-0826-5 ↗
36. Soares JDR, Pasqual M, Rodrigues FA, Villa F, de Araujo AG (2011) Silicon sources in the micropropagation of the Cattleya group orchid. Acta Sci Agron 33:503–507
37. Mathe C, Mosolygo A, Suranyi G, Beke A, Demeter Z, Toth VR et al (2012) Genotype and explants-type dependent morphogenesis and silicon response of common reed (Phragmites australis) tissue cultures. Aquat Bot 97:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.11.00510.1016/j.aquabot.2011.11.005 ↗
38. Mustafa SSS, Toaiema WE (2022) In vitro propagation and influence of silicon nanoparticles on growth of Thymus serpyllum. East J Agric Biol Sci 2: 17–24. https://www.qabasjournals.com/index.php/ejabs/article/view/117. Accessed 20 Mar 2023
39. Mahmoud LM, Dutt M, Shalan AM, El-Kady ME, El-Boray MS, Shabana YM, Grosser JW (2020) Silicon nanoparticles mitigate oxidative stress of in vitro-derived banana (Musa acuminata ‘Grand Nain’) under simulated water deficit or salinity stress. S Afr J Bot 132:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.04.02710.1016/j.sajb.2020.04.027 ↗
40. Baoshan L, Chunhui L, Lijun F, Shuchun Q, Min Y (2004) Effect of TMS (nanostructured silicon dioxide) on growth of Changbai larch seedlings. J For Res 15:138–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0285674910.1007/BF02856749 ↗
41. El-Kady ME, El-Boray MS, Shalan AM, Mohamed LM (2017) Effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on growth improvement of Banana shoots in vitro within rooting stage. J Plant Prod 8:913–916. https://doi.org/10.21608/JPP.2017.4090010.21608/JPP.2017.40900 ↗
42. Parveen N, Ashraf M (2010) Role of silicon in mitigating the adverse effects of salt stress on growth and photosynthetic attributes of two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars grown hydroponically. Pak J Bot 42(3):1675–1684
43. Hossain MT, Mori R, Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Fujii S, Yamamoto R, Hoson T (2002) Growth promotion and an increase in cell wall extensibility by silicon in rice and some other Poaceae seedlings. J Plant Res 115:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265020000410.1007/s102650200004 ↗
44. Mathur P, Roy S (2020) Nanosilica facilitates silica uptake, growth and stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 157:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.10.01110.1016/j.plaphy.2020.10.011 ↗
45. Bairu MW, Kane ME (2011) Physiological and developmental problems encountered by in vitro cultured plants. Plant Growth Regul 63:101–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9565-210.1007/s10725-011-9565-2 ↗
46. Braga FT, Nunes CF, Favero AC, Pasqual M, Carvalho JG, Castro EM (2009) Anatomical characteristics of the strawberry seedlings micropropagated using different sources of silicon. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 44:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X200900020000310.1590/S0100-204X2009000200003 ↗
47. Luz JMQ, Asmar SA, Pasqual M, de Araujo AG, Pio LAS, Resende RF (2012) Modification in leaf anatomy of banana plants cultivar “Maca” subjected to different silicon sources in vitro. Acta Hort 961:239–243
48. Asmar SA, Pasqual M, de Araujo AG, Silva RAL, Rodrigues FA, Pio LAS (2013) Morphophysiological characteristics of acclimatized “Grande Naine” banana plants in response to in vitro use of silicon. Cienc Agrar 34:73–8210.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n1p73 ↗
49. He C, Wang L, Liu J, Liu X, Li X, Ma J et al (2013) Evidence for “silicon” within the cell walls of suspension-cultured rice cells. New Phytol 200:700–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1240110.1111/nph.12401 ↗
50. Seago JL Jr, Marsh LC, Stevens KJ, Soukup A, Votrubová O, Enstone DE (2005) A re-examination of the root cortex in wetland flowering plants with respect to aerenchyma. Ann Bot 96:565–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci21110.1093/aob/mci211 ↗
51. Namyslov J, Bauriedlová Z, Janoušková J, Soukup A, Tylová E (2020) Exodermis and endodermis respond to nutrient deficiency in nutrient-specific and localized manner. Plants 9(2):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants902020110.3390/plants9020201 ↗
52. Xiang J, Ming J, Yin H, Zhu Y, Li Y, Long L, Ye Z, Wang H, Wang X, Zhang F, Yang Y, Yang C (2019) Anatomy and histochemistry of the roots and shoots in the aquatic selenium hyperaccumulator Cardamine hupingshanensis (Brassicaceae). Open Life Sci 14(1):318–326. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-003510.1515/biol-2019-0035 ↗
53. Yeo AR, Flwoers SA, Rao G, Welfare K, Senanayake N, Flowers TJ (1999) Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. Plant Cell Env 22:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00418.x10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00418.x ↗
54. Siddiqui H, Ahmed KBM, Sami F, Hayat S (2020) Silicon nanoparticles and plants: Current knowledge and future perspectives. In: Hayat S, Pichtel J, Faizan M, Fariduddin Q (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 41. Nanotechnology for Plant Growth and Development. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. pp 129–14210.1007/978-3-030-33996-8_7 ↗
55. Chen LL, Chu SS, Zhang L, Xie J, Dai M, Wu X, Peng HS (2019) Tissue-specific metabolite profiling on the different parts of bolting and unbolting Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn (Qianhu) by laser microdissection combined with UPLC-Q/TOF-MS and HPLC-DAD. Molecules 24(7):1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2407143910.3390/molecules24071439 ↗
56. Xie J, Tang X, Xie C, Wang Y, Huang J, Jin J, Liu H, Zhong C, Zhou R, Ren G, Zhang S (2023) Comparative analysis of root anatomical structure, chemical components and differentially expressed genes between early bolting and unbolting in Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn. Genomics 115(2):110557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.11055710.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110557 ↗
57. Luyckx M, Hausman JF, Lutts S, Guerriero G (2017) Silicon and plants: Current knowledge and technological perspectives. Front Plant Sci 8:411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0041110.3389/fpls.2017.00411 ↗
58. Liu P, Yin L, Wang S, Zhang M, Deng X, Zhang S, Tanaka K (2015) Enhanced root hydraulic conductance by aquaporin regulation accounts for silicon alleviated salt-induced osmotic stress in Sorghum bicolor L. Env Exp Bot 111:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.10.00610.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.10.006 ↗
59. Franceschi VR, Nakata PA (2005) Calcium oxalate in plants: formation and function. Ann Rev Plant Biol 56:41–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.14410610.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144106 ↗
60. Lebedev V, Arkaev M, Dremova M, Pozdniakov I, Shestibratov K (2019) Effects of growth regulators and gelling agents on ex vitro rooting of Raspberry. Plants 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants801000310.3390/plants8010003 ↗
61. Mežaka I, Kļaviņa D, Kaļāne L, Kronberga A (2023) Large-scale in vitro propagation and ex vitro adaptation of the endangered medicinal plant Eryngium maritimum L. Horticulturae 9(2):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae902027110.3390/horticulturae9020271 ↗
62. Ziv M (2010) Silicon effects on growth acclimatization and stress tolerance of bioreactor cultured Ornithogalum dubium plants. Acta Hort 865:29–3610.17660/ActaHortic.2010.865.2 ↗
63. Krupa-Małkiewicz M, Calomme M (2021) Actisil application affects growth, flowering, and biochemical parameters in petunia in vitro and greenhouse. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 146:449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02078-310.1007/s11240-021-02078-3 ↗