Two regimes of ionization-induced recovery in SrTiO3 under irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Irradiation of pre-damaged SrTiO3 with 2 MeV He, 1.2 MeV C, 5 MeV C and 12 MeV O ions reveals two regimes of ionization-induced recovery. For C and O ions, with electronic energy loss between 1.6 and 3 keV/nm, recovery cross-sections range from 0.27 to 0.38 nm2, and molecular dynamics confirms recovery related to ionization-induced thermal spikes via electron-phonon coupling. At lower electronic energy losses, recovery cross-sections decrease to about 5.5 × 10−4 nm2 for 2 MeV He ions and 1.0 × 10−5 nm2 for 200 keV electrons, which suggests recovery associated with local electronic excitation processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Zinkle · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2002 · 191 · 75810.1016/S0168-583X(02)00648-1 ↗
2. Weber · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 19 · 110.1016/j.cossms.2014.09.003 ↗
3. Weber · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 772610.1038/srep07726 ↗
4. Sellami · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2018 · 6 · 33910.1080/21663831.2018.1455753 ↗
5. Wilk · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 524310.1063/1.1361065 ↗
6. Haeni · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 75810.1038/nature02773 ↗
7. Spinelli · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 15511010.1103/PhysRevB.81.155110 ↗
8. Rice · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 48110.1038/nmat3914 ↗
9. Reagor · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 59310.1038/nmat1402 ↗
10. Aurino · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102
11. Matthew · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1057210.1021/nn4028135 ↗
12. Liu · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2017 · 406 · 60610.1016/j.nimb.2016.12.023 ↗
13. Crespillo · Crystals · 2019 · 9 · 9510.3390/cryst9020095 ↗
14. Glinšek · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 88 · 3410.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.028 ↗
15. Cain · Chem A. · 2016 · 4 · 10394
16. Weber · MRS Bull. · 2009 · 34 · 4610.1557/mrs2009.12 ↗
17. Sabathier · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2002 · 196 · 30810.1016/S0168-583X(02)01332-0 ↗
18. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 30310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.014 ↗
19. Xue · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 127 · 40010.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.051 ↗
20. Xue · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 150 · 35110.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.027 ↗
21. Karlušić · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 5010.1088/1361-6463/aa678c ↗
22. Li · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2013 · 302 · 4010.1016/j.nimb.2013.03.010 ↗
23. Velişa · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 149 · 25610.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.038 ↗
24. Oyoshi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 345010.1063/1.372365 ↗
25. Zhang · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 1
26. Zhang · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2014 · 338 · 1910.1016/j.nimb.2014.07.028 ↗
27. Thevuthasan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 289 · 20410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00699-1 ↗
28. Ziegler · 1985
29. Weber · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2019
30. Toulemonde · Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. · 2006 · 52 · 263
31. Zarkadoula · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 2253810.1039/C5CP02382C ↗
32. E. Zarkadoula, H. Xue, Y. Zhang Y, W.J. Weber, Scripta Mater. 110 (2016) 2-5.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.05.044 ↗
33. Todorov · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 191110.1039/b517931a ↗
34. McCoy · Philos. Mag. A · 1997 · 75 · 83310.1080/01418619708207205 ↗
35. Zhang · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 21 · 28510.1016/j.cossms.2017.09.003 ↗
36. Li · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1457610.1038/srep14576 ↗