Decomposition behavior in the early-stage oxidation of Sm2Co17-type magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Irredeemable magnetic loss caused by oxidation remains a critical concern for the application of Sm2Co17-type permanent magnets. Herein, oxygen induced decomposition in the early-stage oxidation of a Sm(CobalFe23.5Cu4.9Zr1.7)7.5 magnet is studied using aberration-corrected TEM. Upon oxygen penetration along the 1:3R Z-plates, the 1:5H cell boundaries are decomposed into separate Sm and Co(Fe) lamellae with thicknesses of ~5 nm. Subsequently, the Fe-rich 2:17R cells are decomposed into similar metal lamellae. Besides the normal hexagonal stacking, the Sm lamellae also exhibit a twinned face-centered cubic (FCC) structure. The decomposed Co(Fe) lamellae and Cu particles are FCC-structured. The nano-twinned Cu particles are sparsely distributed. Interestingly, the closely-packed planes of these metal lamellae tend to align with the {0001}2:17R plane. The metal lamellae enriched with oxygen interstitials finally turn into nano-oxides by oxidation. This work offers in-depth insights into the initial oxidation behavior of alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Buschow · 1997 · 463
2. Fidler · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S455
3. Gutfleisch · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
4. Ojima · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1977 · 13 · 131710.1109/TMAG.1977.1059703 ↗
5. Handstein · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 292310.1109/TMAG.2003.815748 ↗
6. Hadjipanayis · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 338210.1109/20.908808 ↗
7. Liu · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 280010.1063/1.369597 ↗
8. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 126 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.050 ↗
9. Xiong · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 73710.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.015 ↗
10. Gopalan · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 134510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.009 ↗
11. Duerrschnabel · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 5410.1038/s41467-017-00059-9 ↗
12. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117
13. Pragnell · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 487 · 6910.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.115 ↗
14. Yang · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 61 · 7210.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.028 ↗
15. Kardelky · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290-291 · 122610.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.408 ↗
16. Shen · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 194 · 32110.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.010 ↗
17. Zhou · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 17410.1016/j.corsci.2020.108808 ↗
18. Wang · ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 190310.1021/acsami.0c18158 ↗
19. Guo · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 94610.1038/s41467-018-03288-8 ↗
20. Wada · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 53210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.019 ↗
21. McCue · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2016 · 46 · 26310.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031739 ↗
22. Xu · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 17310.1016/j.corsci.2020.108752 ↗
23. Nellist · Ultramicroscopy · 1999 · 78 · 11110.1016/S0304-3991(99)00017-0 ↗
24. Song · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 202 · 29010.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.067 ↗
25. Kirklin · npj Comput. Mater. · 2015 · 1 · 1501010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
26. Wu · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 200 · 88310.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.057 ↗
27. Xu · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 49610.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165939 ↗
28. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 180810.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.047 ↗
29. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 164 · 19610.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.046 ↗
30. Pierobon · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 2120910.1038/s41598-020-78010-0 ↗