journal article·2021-07

Decomposition behavior in the early-stage oxidation of Sm2Co17-type magnets

Yong Zhang, Xun Cao, Huiteng Tan, Vincent Gill, Alexis Lambourne, Alex Qingyu Yan, Yizhong Huang

Scripta Materialia· Volume 200
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Irredeemable magnetic loss caused by oxidation remains a critical concern for the application of Sm2Co17-type permanent magnets. Herein, oxygen induced decomposition in the early-stage oxidation of a Sm(CobalFe23.5Cu4.9Zr1.7)7.5 magnet is studied using aberration-corrected TEM. Upon oxygen penetration along the 1:3R Z-plates, the 1:5H cell boundaries are decomposed into separate Sm and Co(Fe) lamellae with thicknesses of ~5 nm. Subsequently, the Fe-rich 2:17R cells are decomposed into similar metal lamellae. Besides the normal hexagonal stacking, the Sm lamellae also exhibit a twinned face-centered cubic (FCC) structure. The decomposed Co(Fe) lamellae and Cu particles are FCC-structured. The nano-twinned Cu particles are sparsely distributed. Interestingly, the closely-packed planes of these metal lamellae tend to align with the {0001}2:17R plane. The metal lamellae enriched with oxygen interstitials finally turn into nano-oxides by oxidation. This work offers in-depth insights into the initial oxidation behavior of alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Buschow · 1997 · 463
2. Fidler · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S455
3. Gutfleisch · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
4. Ojima · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1977 · 13 · 131710.1109/TMAG.1977.1059703 ↗
5. Handstein · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 292310.1109/TMAG.2003.815748 ↗
6. Hadjipanayis · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 338210.1109/20.908808 ↗
7. Liu · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 280010.1063/1.369597 ↗
8. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 126 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.050 ↗
9. Xiong · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 73710.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.015 ↗
10. Gopalan · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 134510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.009 ↗
11. Duerrschnabel · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 5410.1038/s41467-017-00059-9 ↗
12. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117
13. Pragnell · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 487 · 6910.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.115 ↗
14. Yang · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 61 · 7210.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.028 ↗
15. Kardelky · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290-291 · 122610.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.408 ↗
16. Shen · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 194 · 32110.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.010 ↗
17. Zhou · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 17410.1016/j.corsci.2020.108808 ↗
18. Wang · ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 190310.1021/acsami.0c18158 ↗
19. Guo · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 94610.1038/s41467-018-03288-8 ↗
20. Wada · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 53210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.019 ↗
21. McCue · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2016 · 46 · 26310.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031739 ↗
22. Xu · Corros. Sci. · 2020 · 17310.1016/j.corsci.2020.108752 ↗
23. Nellist · Ultramicroscopy · 1999 · 78 · 11110.1016/S0304-3991(99)00017-0 ↗
24. Song · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 202 · 29010.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.067 ↗
25. Kirklin · npj Comput. Mater. · 2015 · 1 · 1501010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
26. Wu · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 200 · 88310.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.057 ↗
27. Xu · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 49610.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165939 ↗
28. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 180810.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.047 ↗
29. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 164 · 19610.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.046 ↗
30. Pierobon · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 2120910.1038/s41598-020-78010-0 ↗