journal article·2017-09

Boundary optimization and coercivity enhancement of high ( BH ) max Nd-Fe-B magnet by diffusing Pr-Tb-Cu-Al alloys

Kechao Lu, Xiaoqian Bao, Minghui Tang, Guixian Chen, Xing Mu, Jiheng Li, Xuexu Gao

Scripta Materialia· Volume 138
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Commercial N50 Nd-Fe-B magnet was processed by grain boundary diffusing Pr-Tb-Cu-Al alloys. The coercivity increased from original 944.9 kA/m to 1640.6 kA/m, 1741.6 kA/m, 1740.2 kA/m and 1775.4 kA/m by diffusing Tb70Cu30, Pr52.5Tb17.5Cu30, Pr60Tb20Al20 and Pr60Tb10Cu15Al15 alloys, respectively. Microstructural analysis confirmed Tb-rich shells on the surfaces of Nd2Fe14B grains, contributing to coercivity enhancement of diffused sample. Especially, the partial replacement of Tb by Pr in diffusion sources resulted in higher coercivity by consuming fewer Tb elements, only 0.34–0.53 wt% Tb in the sample by Pr-Tb-Cu-Al, much lower than 1.82 wt% Tb in the sample by Tb-Cu.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Hono · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 53010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.038 ↗
2. Hirosawa · J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 87310.1063/1.336611 ↗
3. Herbst · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1991 · 63 · 81910.1103/RevModPhys.63.819 ↗
4. Hirota · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 290910.1109/TMAG.2006.879906 ↗
5. Wang · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 404 · 6410.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.016 ↗
6. Xu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 790910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.023 ↗
7. Soderžnik · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.003 ↗
8. Cao · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 116 · 4010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.034 ↗
9. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 198210.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.018 ↗
10. Tang · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 117 · 6010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.019 ↗
11. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 99 · 29710.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.013 ↗
12. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 662210.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.049 ↗
13. Wan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 2391010.1063/1.4879898 ↗
14. Akiya · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A76610.1063/1.4869062 ↗
15. Sepehri-Amin · Scr. Mater. · 2010 · 63 · 112410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.021 ↗
16. Oono · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2011 · 323 · 29710.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.021 ↗
17. Liang · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 355 · 13110.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.007 ↗
18. Sepehri-Amin · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 64710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.07.011 ↗
19. Liu · Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 129 · 4410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.020 ↗
20. Rodewald · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1988 · 24 · 163810.1109/20.11555 ↗
21. Cui · Intermetallics · 2014 · 55 · 11810.1016/j.intermet.2014.07.020 ↗
22. Nakamura · J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 4410.1088/0022-3727/44/6/064003 ↗
23. Loewe · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 124 · 42110.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.034 ↗