journal article·2020-03

Ab initio prediction of strong interfacial bonding in the Fe|Al bimetallic composite system

Kamil Czelej, Krzysztof J. Kurzydłowski

Scripta Materialia· Volume 177
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Atomic-scale calculations were used to investigate the formation of interfacial bonds in the Fe|Al bimetallic composite system. The results indicate that chemical bonds at pristine Fe|Al interface display more covalent character than constituent materials resulting in enhanced interface strength. Such an interface exhibits large cohesive energy exceeding significantly the value of bulk aluminum. The effect of two technologically relevant solute elements, i.e. carbon and magnesium on the interface strength was analyzed. Our robust yet simple computational model can be used to predict the most efficient combination of steels and aluminum alloys for cold pressure welding, leading to strong interfacial bonding.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Sun · Mater. Des. · 2013 · 47 · 35010.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.007 ↗
2. Yao · Opt. Lasers Eng. · 2009 · 47 · 80710.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.02.004 ↗
3. Peter · Materialia · 2019 · 710.1016/j.mtla.2019.100396 ↗
4. Akinlabi · Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China · 2014 · 24 · 132310.1016/S1003-6326(14)63195-2 ↗
5. Springer · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 463010.1016/j.msea.2011.02.057 ↗
6. Zamanzade · Crystals · 2016 · 6 · 1010.3390/cryst6010010 ↗
7. Mori · CIRP Ann. · 2013 · 62 · 67310.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.004 ↗
8. Groche · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2014 · 214 · 197210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.022 ↗
9. Groche · IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2016 · 119 · 1202510.1088/1757-899X/119/1/012025 ↗
10. Bay · J. Eng. Ind. · 1979 · 101 · 12110.1115/1.3439484 ↗
11. Marstatt · IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 181 · 1200210.1088/1757-899X/181/1/012002 ↗
12. Altin · Tribol. Manuf. Process. Join. Plast. Deform. · 2014 · 966 · 445
13. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 708 · 5010.1016/j.msea.2017.09.111 ↗
14. Wohletz · Procedia Eng. · 2014 · 81 · 200010.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.271 ↗
15. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
16. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
17. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
18. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
19. Sinnott · Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. · 2003 · 43 · 110.1016/j.mser.2003.09.001 ↗
20. Lu · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87
21. Lazar · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78
22. Kwasniak · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 154 · 13710.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.01.056 ↗
23. Chen · Phys. Status Solidi · 2012 · 249 · 208910.1002/pssb.201248195 ↗
24. Hector · J. Alloys Compd. · 2003 · 353 · 7410.1016/S0925-8388(02)01324-5 ↗
25. Becke · J. Chem. Phys. · 1990 · 92 · 539710.1063/1.458517 ↗