Origin of twin-like { 33 6 ¯ 4 } tilt boundary and associated solute segregation in a high strain rate deformed Mg-Y alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
A high strain rate compressed Mg-Y alloy is prepared for the study of < 1 1 ¯ 00 > symmetric tilt grain boundary. A twin-like { 33 6 ¯ 4 } tilt boundary, which is formed via the evolution of { 11 2 ¯ 1 } twin boundary, is commonly found for the first time in the deformed Mg-Y alloy. Via combining high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy and density functional theory calculations, the formation of { 33 6 ¯ 4 } tilt boundary and the associated segregation of Y atoms are rationalized. Such a finding provides a new vision on twinning behavior for the design of new high-performance Mg alloys.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
2. Liao · MRS Bull · 2016 · 41 · 31410.1557/mrs.2016.64 ↗
3. Christian · Prog. Mater Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
4. Arul Kumar · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 476110.1038/s41467-018-07028-w ↗
5. Hong · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 587310.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.002 ↗
6. Molodov · Acta Mater · 2014 · 76 · 31410.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.066 ↗
7. Park · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 532 · 40110.1016/j.msea.2011.11.003 ↗
8. Xin · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.033 ↗
9. Chen · Acta Mater · 2019 · 164 · 44010.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.064 ↗
10. Wang · Acta Mater · 2019 · 163 · 6810.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.009 ↗
11. Nie · Science · 2013 · 340 · 95710.1126/science.1229369 ↗
12. Zhang · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 80 · 1710.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.02.004 ↗
13. Chen · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 178 · 19310.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.11.025 ↗
14. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2017 · 127 · 50510.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.032 ↗
15. Tsuru · Acta Mater · 2018 · 151 · 7810.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.061 ↗
16. Stanford · Acta Mater · 2015 · 82 · 44710.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.022 ↗
17. Stanford · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2008 · 88 · 37910.1080/09500830802070793 ↗
18. He · Scr. Mater. · 2021 · 191 · 6210.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.041 ↗
19. Zhang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 81 · 21210.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.062 ↗
20. Wang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2012 · 43 · 355610.1007/s11661-012-1177-6 ↗
21. Ostapovets · Philos. Mag. · 2018 · 98 · 323510.1080/14786435.2018.1524160 ↗
22. Ni · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 109 · 9410.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.028 ↗
23. He · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12
24. Kresse · Comp. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
25. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
28. Shao · Materialia · 2019 · 610.1016/j.mtla.2019.100287 ↗
29. Lane · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 8410.1103/PhysRevB.84.184101 ↗