Mössbauer and SEM characterisation of the scale on type 304 stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Defects that form on stainless steels during production cause reworking, leading to higher production costs associated with production delays. Primarily wrong casting, rolling, grinding, annealing and pickling practices cause typical metallurgical defects such as the formation of residual scale. In the present investigation the problem of residual scale development on austenitic stainless steel (type AISI 304, with typical composition 19%Cr, 8%Ni, 1.5%Mn, <1%Si and the balance Fe) was investigated. Scale that is not removed during the pickling process is referred to as residual scale. Characterization of the surface scale is a prerequisite for effective measures aimed at minimizing scale formation and the design of efficient descaling procedures. The scale consists of an outer layer of iron oxides and an inner layer composed of small grains of FeCr{sub 2}O{sub 4} with the scale-metal interface not uniform and oxidation occurring along grain boundaries. Internal oxidation is found near the scale-metal interface with the amount of unoxidized metal increasing toward the scale-metal interface. If the scale is not removed from the hot steel it may be rolled into the product surface which will then require additional processing. Descaling presently used for stainless steel comprises of acid pickling, mechanical descaling and electrolytic pickling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. L. D. Griesel, Innovative Metallurgical Services, Columbus Stainless Laboratory, pp. 1–18 (1996).
2. B. Ozturk, CSIR Progress Report, pp. 233–249, April 1992.
3. H. Abuluwefa, R. I. L. Guthrie, and F. Mucciardi, 34th MWSP Conference Proceedings, Vol. XXX, pp. 453–468 (1993).
4. M. Bolleurs, private communication.
5. R. L. Cohen, ed., Applications of Mössbauer Spectroscopy. 1st ed., Academic Press, New York 349 (1978).
6. J. M. Friedt and J. Danon in Mössbauer Spectroscopy: Principles and Examples of Chemical Applications, in E. Fluck and V. I. Goldanskii, Modern Physics in Chemistry: Volume 2, Academic Press, London, 320 (1979).
7. Greenwood · Chem Britian · 1967 · 3 · 6
8. S. J. Clark, D. Donaldson, and S. M. Grimes, Mössbauer Spectroscopy, p. 343 (1985).10.1039/9781847555021-00343 ↗
9. G. Snyder and J. J. Spijkerman, Mössbauer Spectrometer and Other Accessories, p. 33–9754 (1978).
10. J. G. Stevens, A. M. Khasonoiv, J. W. Miller, H. Pollak, and Z. Li, eds., Mössbauer Mineral Handbook, Baltimore Press, Asheville, NC 527 (1998).
11. F. B. Waanders, H. Pollak, and S. W. Vorster, Hyperfine Interactions C3, pp. 281–284 (1998).
12. L. Mathews, private communication.