Synthesis and mechanical characterization of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials reinforced with nickel-titanium-magnesium alloys for use in cortical bone implants
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, biomaterials consisting of bioactive hydroxyapatite-based ceramic and nickel-titanium-magnesium alloys were made. The biomaterials were obtained through powder techniques involving mechanical milling, uniaxial pressing and pressureless sintering. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of alloys on the mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite, the alloy additions were 0, 20, 30, 40, 40, 50 and 60 wt.%. The results were compared with cortical bone samples of bovine origin. From the results, it is possible to comment that, with increasing alloy contents in the hydroxyapatite, the mechanical properties increase considerably. The behavior of the composites reinforced with 50 and 60 wt.% NiTiMg alloy is similar to that of bovine cortical bone. The microstructures of the biomaterials are fine, homogeneous, and similar to those of bovine cortical bone. From the study it can be commented that given the mechanical characteristics of the biomaterials obtained, they could be used as possible bone implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México
Industrial Materials Research and Development Laboratory, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Centro Universitario UAEM Valle de México, México
Research Department, Universidad Politécnica de Victoria, México
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. K. Ríos-Puerta and O. Darío Gutiérrez-Flores, Revista Politécnica, 18 (2022) 24. https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v18n35a210.33571/rpolitec.v18n35a2 ↗
2. M. Saini, World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3 (2015) 52. https://doi:10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52.10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52 ↗
3. J. Black and G. Hastings, Handbook of biomaterial properties, 2013, Accessed: March. 9, 2024. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=EWPlBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13& ots=KmbPU9iVa6&sig=OaO6u1NxOxPuXYA2QHVTiorLvLA
4. Q. Chen and G. A. Thouas, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, 87 (2015) 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
5. N.S. Manam, W.S.W. Harun, D.N.A. Shri , S.A.C. Ghani, T. Kurniawan, M.H. Ismail and M.H.I. Ibrahim, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 701 (2017) 698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.196.10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.196 ↗
6. A. Galić, T. Matić, N. Obradović, Z. Baščarević and D. Veljović, Science of Sintering, 55 (2023) 469. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS220723019G.10.2298/SOS220723019G ↗
7. D. Drdlik, K. Drdlikova and K. Maca, “Dilatometric and Microstructural Study of Particle and Functionally Graded Composites Based on Hydroxyapatite and Crystalline Bioglass”, Science of Sintering, 55 (2023) 289-306. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS221028017D.10.2298/SOS221028017D ↗
8. F. Fendi, B. Abdullah, S. Suryani, I. Raya, A. Nilawati-Usman, D. Tahir, AIP Conf. Proc. 2719, 020040 (2023) 8-9 September 2021, Palu, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.013323210.1063/5.0133232 ↗
9. Hartatiek, J. Utomo, L. Ika Noerjannah, N.Z. Rohmah, Yudyanto, Materials Today Proceedings, 44 (2021) 3263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.511.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.511 ↗
10. L.S. Grinschpun and C.R. Oldani, Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Argentina 8 (2021) 55. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/FCEFyN/article/view/32233
11. N. Nomura, K. Sakamoto, K. Takahashi, S. Kato, Y. Abe, H. Doi, Y. Tsutsumi, M. Kobayashi, E. Kobayashi, W-J. Kim, K-H. Kim, T. Hanawa, Mater. Trans., 51 (2010) 1449. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M201009210.2320/matertrans.M2010092 ↗
12. C.A. Roure, C.R. Oldani, and R.O. Lucci, Ajea, (2020). https://doi.org/10.33414/ajea.5.706.202010.33414/ajea.5.706.2020 ↗
13. V. Pineda, O. Olivares, J. Yépez, and A. González, Rev. Odontológica Mex., 23 (2020) 149. https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2019.23.3.7562310.22201/fo.1870199xp.2019.23.3.75623 ↗
14. I. Martínez Ibáñez, Universidad Politécnica de Valéncia, Spain (2021). http://hdl.handle.net/10251/174753
15. J. Moreno, Institutional Repository, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina, (2020) 1. http://rinfi.fi.mdp.edu.ar/handle/123456789/467
16. M. Barrabés, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, Spain (2005). http://hdl.handle.net/2099.1/3183
17. N. Montañez, D. Peña, and H. Estupiñán, Ion, Universidad Industrial de Santander Colombia, 1 (2008) 87.
18. American Society for Testing Materials, ASTM E9 - 89a, Standard Test Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Materials at Room Temperature. (Reapproved 2000).
19. American Society for Testing Materials, ASTM E384 - 16, Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials, 2016.
20. E. García-Barea, Undergraduate Thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (2015).
21. M. J. Glimcher, Biophysical Science, John Wiley & Sons. Inc. New York. 359-393 (1959).