Controlling of the structural characteristics of ZnO nanomaterials by reaction pressure and reaction time
Source abstract
Abstract
The most significant parameters affecting particle size and morphology in nanoscale powder production are the working temperature and working time. The reduction in size leads to the addition of new electrical, mechanical, chemical and optical properties to the materials. The properties of nano ZnO are of special importance due to its multi-dimensional applications in the fields of industry, cosmetics, electronics, etc. Zinc oxide (ZnO) with various morphologies was synthesized by hydrothermal method at different temperatures (140, 180 and 220oC) and different times (12, 18 and 24 h). The samples were characterized by SEM, EDX, XRD and UV-vis techniques.SEM and EDX findings show that especially ZnO nanostructures have developed. The pattern of the XRD showed that the sample was well crystallized in a structure of hexagonal wurtzite. The energy band gap values samples synthesized at different parameters were found to be 3.07, 3.10, 3.19, 3.17 and 3.13 eV, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fırat University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Elaziğ, Turkey
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Cangül Aktürk (Fırat Unıversty) (2013).10.1186/1687-1847-2013-269 ↗
2. O Gençyilmaz, F Atay, and İ Akyüz, Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 16, 1 (2012) 56.
3. S Sonali, I Jena, and S K Rout Mater. Today Proc. (2020) 2.
4. D Nipane, S R Thakare, and N T Khati Int. J. Knowl. Eng. 3 (2012) 168.
5. K Maitreekeaw and T Chanadee Sci. Sinter. 52 (2020) 491.10.2298/SOS2004491M ↗
6. S Agarwal, P Rai, E N Gatell, E Llobet, F Güell, M Kumar, and K Awasthi Sensors Actuators, B Chem., 292 (2019) 24.10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.083 ↗
7. C Peng, J Guo, W Yang, C Shi, M Liu, Y Zheng, J Xu, P Chen, T Huang, and Y Yang J. Alloys Compd., 654 (2016) 371.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.120 ↗
8. J Xiong, G Cheng, G Li, F Qin, and R Chen RSC Adv., 1 (2011) 1542.10.1039/c1ra00335f ↗
9. S Cho, J W Jang, S H Jung, B R Lee, E Oh, and K H Lee Langmuir, 25 (2009) 3825.10.1021/la804009g ↗
10. X.u, M Wang, W Sun, and R Yang J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 28 (2017) 1470210.1007/s10854-017-7338-z ↗
11. D Jeremić, L Andjelković, M R Milenković, M Šuljagić, M Š Ristović, S Ostojić, A S Nikolić, P Vulić, I Brčeski, and V Pavlović Sci. Sinter., 52 (2020) 481.
12. N Fathima, N Pradeep, V Uma, and J Balakrishnan Mater. Today Proc., 9 (2019) 24710.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.156 ↗
13. Z Yin, X Liu, Y Wu, X Hao, and X Xu Opt. Express, 20 (2012) 1013.10.1364/OE.20.001013 ↗
14. Q Liang, F Qiao, X Cui, and X Hou Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 89 (2019) 154.10.1016/j.mssp.2018.09.007 ↗
15. E Wolska-Kornio, J Kaszewski, B S Witkowski, Wachnicki, and M Godlewski Opt. Mater. (Amst)., 59 (2016) 103.10.1016/j.optmat.2016.01.021 ↗
16. J Xu, Z Xue, N Qin, Z Cheng, and Q Xiang Sensors Actuators, B Chem., 242 (2017) 148.10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.193 ↗
17. S Bazazi, N Arsalani, A Khataee, and A G Tabrizi J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 62 (2018) 265.10.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.004 ↗
18. L Zhu, Y Li, and W Zeng Appl. Surf. Sci., 427 (2018) 281.10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.229 ↗
19. J Yang, X Liu, L Yang, Y Wang, Y Zhang, J Lang, M Gao, and B Feng J. Alloys Compd., 477 (2009) 632.10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.135 ↗
20. E Özbay Selcuk Univ. J. Eng. ,Science Technol., 2 (2014) 1.10.15317/Scitech.2014410337 ↗
21. B S Barros, R Barbosa, N R Dos Santos, T S Barros, and M A Souza Inorg. Mater., 42 (2006) 1348.10.1134/S0020168506120119 ↗
22. M Karakız (Kırıkkale Unıversty) (2008).