Personalized road feel control strategy accounting for drivers’ strength decline
Source abstract
Abstract
Road feel is a feature of steering resistance from the road perceived by drivers. A sound road feel design can improve the comfort and stability of drivers’ steering maneuvers. However, currently available steering systems do not adapt well to the real-time changes in drivers’ muscle strength decline, which increases their strain and reduces the stability of steering after long driving. To solve this problem, a personalized road feel control strategy that accounts for drivers’ strength decline and comprises a strength decline identification layer, and a road feel control layer is proposed. On the identification layer, the drivers’ strength decline characteristics are obtained from hardware-in-loop experimental data. The recursive least squares algorithm with adaptive forgetting factor is proposed to realize an online identification of the mechanical properties of the drivers’ arms, and their mapping relationship with the strength decline characteristics is established using the long short-term memory neural network. On the road feel control layer, considering the uncertainty of the muscle model’s parameters, a personalized road feel controller is designed, where unfixed parameters are kept within an invariant set, and the optimal road feel torque is derived from the muscle’s strength decline characteristics. Experiments show that this strategy can effectively curb drivers’ muscle strength decline and improve the smoothness of the torque after long driving.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Liang W H, Zhao W Z, Wang C Y, et al. Harmonic suppression and road feeling control of steer-by-wire system with permanent magnet synchronous motor. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2022, 172: 10898310.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108983 ↗
2. Sun Z, Zheng J, Man Z, et al. Nested adaptive super-twisting sliding mode control design for a vehicle steer-by-wire system. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2019, 122: 658–67210.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.050 ↗
3. Zhou C, Liu X, Xu F. Intervention criterion and control strategy of active front steering system for emergency rescue vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 148: 10716010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107160 ↗
4. Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, et al. Research on LADRC strategy of PMSM for road-sensing simulation based on differential evolution algorithm. J Power Electron, 2020, 20: 958–97010.1007/s43236-020-00090-y ↗
5. Liang X, Zhao L, Wang Q, et al. A novel steering-by-wire system with road sense adaptive friction compensation. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2022, 169: 10874110.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108741 ↗
6. Zhang L, Meng Q, Chen H, et al. Kalman filter-based fusion estimation method of steering feedback torque for steer-by-wire systems. Automot Innov, 2021, 4: 430–43910.1007/s42154-021-00159-9 ↗
7. Zhao R, Deng W, Ren B, et al. Modeling on steering feedback torque based on data-driven method. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2022, 27: 2775–278510.1109/TMECH.2021.3119751 ↗
8. Liu Y, Zhang G, Li J, et al. Steering feedback torque prediction based on sequence-to-sequence network with switcher-assisted training algorithm. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2024, 20: 4894–490510.1109/TII.2023.3329650 ↗
9. Jiang Y, Deng W, Wu J, et al. Adaptive steering feedback torque design and control for driver-vehicle system considering driver handling properties. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2019, 68: 5391–540610.1109/TVT.2019.2908987 ↗
10. Gholami A, Majidi M. Development of a neuromuscular driver model with an estimation of steering torque feedback in vehicle steer-by-wire systems. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part K-J Multi-body Dyn, 2019, 233: 657–667
11. Xu F X, Feng S Y, John Cruz Nacpil E, et al. Modeling lateral control behaviors of distracted drivers for haptic-shared steering system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2023, 24: 14772–1478210.1109/TITS.2023.3293504 ↗
12. Zheng W, Zheng R, Kaizuka T, et al. Evaluation of driver steering performance with haptic guidance under passive fatigued situation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). Budapest, 2016. 003334–003339
13. Ma J, Zhang J, Gong Z, et al. Study on fatigue driving detection model based on steering operation features and eye movement features. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Control Science and Systems Engineering (ICCSSE). Wuhan, 2018. 472–475
14. Wang L. The design of the steering wheel with anti-fatigue driving for vehicles based on pattern recognition. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation. Zhangjiajie, 2012. 340–343
15. Kishishita Y, Takemura K, Yamada N, et al. Prediction of perceived steering wheel operation force by muscle activity. IEEE Trans Haptics, 2018, 11: 590–59810.1109/TOH.2018.2828425 ↗
16. Sikander G, Anwar S. A novel machine vision-based 3D facial action unit identification for fatigue detection. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2021, 22: 2730–274010.1109/TITS.2020.2974263 ↗
17. Pronker A J, Abbink D A, van Paassen M M, et al. Estimating an LPV model of driver neuromuscular admittance using grip force as scheduling variable. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst, 2020, 50: 454–46410.1109/THMS.2020.2989685 ↗
18. Liu Y, Liu Q, Lv C, et al. A study on objective evaluation of vehicle steering comfort based on driver’s electromyogram and movement trajectory. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst, 2018, 48: 41–4910.1109/THMS.2017.2755469 ↗
19. Wang L, Wang H, Liu J. Discrimination of driver fatigue based on distortion energy density theory and multiple physiological signals. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 151824–15183310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3125052 ↗
20. Choi G, Lim K, Pan S B. Driver identification system using 2D ECG and EMG based on multistream CNN for intelligent vehicle. IEEE Sens Lett, 2022, 6: 1–410.1109/LSENS.2022.3175787 ↗
21. Wang Z, Suga S, Nacpil E J C, et al. Adaptive driver-automation shared steering control via forearm surface electromyography measurement. IEEE Sens J, 2021, 21: 5444–545310.1109/JSEN.2020.3035169 ↗
22. Barua S, Ahmed M U, Ahlstrom C, et al. Automated EEG artifact handling with application in driver monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2018, 22: 1350–136110.1109/JBHI.2017.2773999 ↗
23. Vinti M, Saikia M J, Donoghue J, et al. Broader estimates of gastrocnemius activity generated a more representative cocontraction index: A study in pediatric population. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2023, 31: 4382–438910.1109/TNSRE.2023.3329057 ↗
24. Pick A J, Cole D J. Dynamic properties of a driver’s arms holding a steering wheel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng, 2007, 221: 1475–148610.1243/09544070JAUTO460 ↗
25. de Vlugt E, Schouten A C, van der Helm F C T. Closed-loop multi-variable system identification for the characterization of the dynamic arm compliance using continuous force disturbances: A model study. J Neurosci Methods, 2003, 122: 123–14010.1016/S0165-0270(02)00303-5 ↗
26. Hill A V. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1938, 126: 136–19510.1098/rspb.1938.0050 ↗
27. Woittiez R D, Huijing P A, Rozendal R H. Influence of muscle architecture on the length-force diagram of mammalian muscle. Pflugers Arch, 1983, 399: 275–27910.1007/BF00652752 ↗
28. Hatze H. A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle. Biol Cybern, 1977, 25: 103–11910.1007/BF00337268 ↗
29. van Soest A J, Bobbert M F. The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements. Biol Cybern, 1993, 69: 195–20410.1007/BF00198959 ↗
30. Martins J A C, Pires E B, Salvado R, et al. A numerical model of passive and active behavior of skeletal muscles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 1998, 151: 419–43310.1016/S0045-7825(97)00162-X ↗
31. Zajac F E. Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 1989, 17: 359–411
32. Mayne D Q, Seron M M, Raković S V. Robust model predictive control of constrained linear systems with bounded disturbances. Automatica, 2005, 41: 219–22410.1016/j.automatica.2004.08.019 ↗
33. Liu Y, Ji X, Hayama R, et al. A novel estimating method for steering efficiency of the driver with electromyography signals. Chin J Mech Eng, 2014, 27: 460–46710.3901/CJME.2014.03.460 ↗
34. Borg G A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1982, 14: 377–38110.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 ↗