On-line diagnosis method of crack behavior abnormality in concrete dams based on fluctuation of sequential parameter estimates
Source abstract
Abstract
Research on on-line diagnosis method of crack behavior abnormality in concrete dams can provide support for timely grasping abnormality state of the crack itself and achieving real-time monitoring of the dam safety. Considering that samples of crack effects in concrete dams increase actually over monitoring time, a superiority criterion for the on-line diagnosis is determined so as to detect the abnormality moments timely and reliably. By integrating the safety monitoring statistical model of crack effect variable with change point theory, a fluctuation method of regression coefficients is established for the on-line diagnosis. In addition, each abnormality moment is detected by the cumulative sum of regression model residuals. Results indicate that abnormality of crack behavior in concrete dams can be characterized by structural instability of crack monitoring model. And causes of crack behavior abnormality can be analyzed by the established method, which will play an important role in dam safety monitoring. Further, taking the crack in a concrete gravity-arch dam as an example, the scientific rationality and validity of the established on-line diagnosis method are confirmed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dam Engineering and Safety · Landslides and related hazards · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu Z, Gu C. Safety Monitoring Theory and Its Application of Hydraulic Structures. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003
2. Shen Z, Chen Y, Wang C, et al. Development of real-time monitoring and early warning system of dam safety. Adv Sci Tech Water Resour, 2010, 30: 68–72
3. International Commission on Large Dams. Inspection of Dams Following Earthquakes-Guidelines, Bulletin 62, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, Paris. 1988
4. Wieland M, Brennerand R P, Sommer P. Earthquake resiliency of large concrete dams: Damage, repair, and strengthening concepts. In: Proceedings of 21th Congress of International Commission on Large Dams. Montreal, Canada, 2003. 388–397
5. Plizzari G A. LEFM applications to concrete gravity dams. J Eng Mech-ASCE, 1997, 123: 808–81510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:8(808) ↗
6. Araujo J M, Awruch A M. Cracking safety evaluation on gravity concrete dams during the construction phase. Comput Struct, 1998, 66: 93–10410.1016/S0045-7949(97)00048-5 ↗
7. Abdulrazeg A A, Noorzaei J, Khanehzaei P, et al. Effect of temperature and creep on roller compacted concrete dam during the construction stages. Cmes Comp Model Eng, 2010, 68: 239–268
8. Abdulrazeg A A, Khanehzaei P, Noorzaei J, et al. Cracking Safety Evaluation of Massive Concrete Structures. In: Fracture and Strength of Solids. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011, 1403–1408
9. Barpi F, Valente S. Subcritical crack propagation under cyclic load of concrete structures. Mag Concrete Res, 2010, 62: 489–49610.1680/macr.2010.62.7.489 ↗
10. Dan L, Lizhe L. Study and engineering practice on cracks control measures for concrete face slab of high CFRD. Future Material Res Ind Appl, 2012, 455–456: 1606–1611
11. Ekstrom T. Safety of cracked buttress dams-an example. In: Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century. Barcelona, 2006. 679–686.10.1201/b16818-107 ↗
12. Malm R, Ansell A. Cracking of concrete buttress dam due to seasonal temperature variation. Aci Struct J, 2011, 108: 13–22
13. Pan J W, Feng Y T, Jin F, et al. Comparison of different fracture modelling approaches to gravity dam failure. Eng Computation, 2014, 31: 18–3210.1108/EC-04-2012-0091 ↗
14. Jin F, Hu W, Pan J W, et al. Comparative study procedure for the safety evaluation of high arch dams. Comput Geotech, 2011, 38: 306–31710.1016/j.compgeo.2010.10.008 ↗
15. Mirzabozorg H, Kianoush R, Jalalzadeh B. Damage mechanics approach and modeling nonuniform cracking within finite elements for safety evaluation of concrete dams in 3D space. Struct Eng Mech, 2009, 33: 31–4610.12989/sem.2009.33.1.031 ↗
16. Ren Q W, Li Q, Liu S. Research advance in failure risk and local strength failure for high arch dams. Chin Sci Bull, 2012, 57: 4672–468210.1007/s11434-012-5563-7 ↗
17. Wang S S, Ren Q W. Dynamic response of gravity dam model with crack and damage detection. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 541–54610.1007/s11431-010-4226-7 ↗
18. Wang W M, Ding J X, Wang G J, et al. Stability analysis of the temperature cracks in Xiaowan Arch Dam. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 547–55510.1007/s11431-010-4280-1 ↗
19. Zheng D, Huo Z, Li B. Arch-dam crack deformation monitoring hybrid model based on XFEM. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 2611–261710.1007/s11431-011-4550-6 ↗
20. Kaplan M F. Crack propagation and the fracture of concrete. J Am Concrete Institute, 1961, 58: 591–610
21. Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Peterson P E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concrete Res, 1976, 6: 773–78210.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
22. Bazant Z P, Oh B H. Crack band model for concrete. Mater Struct, 1983, 16: 155–177
23. Mazars J M, Pijaudier C G. Continuum damage theory-application to concrete. J Eng Mech-ASCE, 1989, 115: 345–365.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) ↗
24. Cervera M, Oliver J, Faria R. Seismic evaluation of concrete dam via continuum damage model. Earthq Eng Struct D, 1995, 24: 1225–124510.1002/eqe.4290240905 ↗
25. Li X, Xu H, Gu C, et al. Abnormality diagnosis of cracks based on wavelet analysis and cusp catastrophe model. J Hohai Univ (Natural Sciences), 2005, 33: 301–305
26. Li X, Xu H, Gu C, et al. Detecting abnormality point of dam crack based on phase plane. J Basic Sci Eng, 2007, 15: 177–182
27. Bao T, Yu H. Detection of subcritical crack propagation for concrete dams. Sci China Series E-Tech Sci, 2009, 52: 3654–366010.1007/s11431-009-0317-8 ↗
28. Bao T. Chaotic characteristics, analysis theories and methods of cracks in concrete dams. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004
29. Gu C, Li Z, Xu B. Abnormality diagnosis of cracks in the concrete dam based on dynamical structure mutation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 1930–193910.1007/s11431-011-4331-2 ↗
30. Li Z, Gu C, Wu Z. Nonparametric change point diagnosis method of concrete dam crack behavior abnormality. Math Probl Eng, 2013, doi:10.1155/2013/969021
31. Li Z, Li H, Liu Q. Complete sequence small probability method for concrete dam crack behavior abnormality diagnosis. Disaster Adv, 2013, 6: 257–264.
32. Li Z, Wang J, Bao T, et al. Improved safety monitoring model of crack in concrete dams. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments-Earth and Space, Honolulu, HI, 2010. 559–566
33. Bao T, Qin D, Zhou X, et al. Abnormality monitoring model of cracks in concrete dams. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 1914–192210.1007/s11431-011-4332-1 ↗
34. Bažant Z P, Becq-Giraudon E. Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard. Cement Concrete Res, 2002, 32: 529–55610.1016/S0008-8846(01)00723-2 ↗
35. Aue A. Sequential change-point analysis based on invariance princples. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Koeln: Universitaet zu Koeln, 2003
36. Li Z, Gu C, Wu Z. Abnormality diagnosis of cracks in the concrete based on double crack tip opening displacement criterion. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1915–192810.1007/s11431-013-5275-5 ↗
37. Gu C, Qin D, Li Z, et al. Study on semi-parametric statistical model of safety monitoring of cracks in concrete dams. Math Probl Eng, 2013, doi:10.1155/2013/874629
38. Chu C S J, Stinchcombe M, White H. Monitoring structural change. Econometrica J Econometric Society, 1996: 1045-106510.2307/2171955 ↗
39. Horváth L, Hušková M, Kokoszka P, et al. Monitoring changes in linear models. J Stat Plan Infer, 2004, 126: 225–25110.1016/j.jspi.2003.07.014 ↗
40. Ghosh B, Sen P. Handbook of Sequential Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991
41. Robbins H. Statistical methods related to the law of the iterated logarithm. Ann Mathematical Statistics, 1970, 41: 1397–140910.1214/aoms/1177696786 ↗
42. Xia Z. Detecting structural changes in statistical models sequentially. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Xi’an: Northwest University, 2009
43. Aue A, Horváth L. Delay time in sequential detection of change. Stat Probabil Lett, 2004, 67: 221–23110.1016/j.spl.2004.01.002 ↗
44. Lai T L. Sequential analysis: some classical problems and new chalenges. Statist Sinica, 2001, 11: 303–350
45. Phillips P, Durlauf S. Multiple time series regression with integrated processes. Review Economic Studies, 1986, 53: 473–49510.2307/2297602 ↗
46. Wooldridge J, Halbert W. Some invariance principles and central limit theorems for dependent heterogeneous processes. Econometric Theory, 1988, 4: 210–23010.1017/S0266466600012032 ↗
47. Zeileis A, Leisch F, Kleiber C, et al. Monitoring structural change in dynamic econometric models. J Appl Econometrics, 2005, 20: 99–12110.1002/jae.776 ↗
48. Leisch F, Hornik K, Kuan C M. Monitoring structural changes with the generalized fluctuation test. Econometric Theory, 2000, 16: 835–85410.1017/S0266466600166022 ↗
49. Horvath L, Kokoszka P, Steinebach J. On sequential detection of parameter changes in linear regression. Stat Probabil Lett, 2007, 77: 885–89510.1016/j.spl.2006.12.014 ↗
50. Csörgö M, Horváth L. Limit Theorems in Change-Point Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1997
51. Hušková M, Kirch C. Bootstrapping sequential change-point tests for linear regression. Metrika, 2012, 75: 673–70810.1007/s00184-011-0347-7 ↗
52. Aue A, Horváth L. Structural breaks in time series. J Time Ser Anal, 2013, 34: 1–1610.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00819.x ↗
53. Wu Z. Theory and Testing Technology of Dam Safety Monitoring. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2009