journal article·2016-02

An eco-functional classification for environmental flow assessment in the Pearl River Basin in Guangdong, China

Bei Wang, DongGuo Shao, GuiLing Mu, ZhuoMin Wang, XuDong Li

Publisher page

Abstract

River classification has emerged as a major application of environmental science, which can overcome the defects of traditional methods in focusing on the single objective of maintaining specified, valued features of ecosystems. However, current efforts to classify rivers by hydrologic processes may result in a growing temptation to ignore ecological variability across basins. Thus, an eco-functional classification is proposed for river management in the Pearl River Basin. This method views ecological functions as fundamental characteristics of riverine systems and provides a framework for dividing a basin into eco-specific categories according to the heterogeneity of the primary ecological functions. In addition, we proposed specific environmental flow methodologies corresponding to three typical river reaches of the basin by perceiving the key attributes of flow variability. In the upstream region of the West River, flow velocity and wetted perimeter are considered as the key attributes of maintaining fish habitat; in a small-sized mountainous tributary of the North river, we choose water surface area to maintain the continuity and biodiversity of the river; while for the aspect of river landscape in the midstream reach of the East River, water level is crucial for maintaining the aesthetic value. This research highlights the ecologically relevant heterogeneity that occurs within and among regions of a basin, and is expected to contribute to a simpler and more comprehensive river management.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Bradford M J, Higgins P S, Korman J, et al. Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: Does more water mean more fish? Freshwater Biol, 2011, 56: 2119–213410.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02633.x ↗
2. Liechti T C, Matos J P, Boillat J L, et al. Influence of hydropower development on flow regime in the zambezi river basin for different scenarios of environmental flows. Water Resour Manag, 2015, 29: 731–74710.1007/s11269-014-0838-1 ↗
3. Bunn S E, Arthington A H. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage, 2002, 30: 492–50710.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 ↗
4. Poff N L, Zimmerman J K H. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biol, 2010, 55: 194–20510.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x ↗
5. Jackson S, Pollino C, Maclean K, et al. Meeting Indigenous peoples’ objectives in environmental flow assessments: Case studies from an Australian multi-jurisdictional water sharing initiative. J Hydrol, 2015, 522: 141–15110.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.047 ↗
6. Male J W. Tradeoffs in water quality management. J Water Res Pl, 1984, 110: 434–44410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1984)110:4(434) ↗
7. Tharme R E. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl, 2003, 19: 397–44110.1002/rra.736 ↗
8. Karimi S S, Yasi M, Eslamian S. Use of hydrological methods for assessment of environmental flow in a river reach. Int J Environ Sci Te, 2012, 9: 549–55810.1007/s13762-012-0062-6 ↗
9. Reinfelds I, Haeusler T, Brooks A J, et al. Refinement of the wetted perimeter breakpoint method for setting cease-to-pump limits or minimum environmental flows. River Res Appl, 2004, 20: 671–68510.1002/rra.784 ↗
10. Li R N, Chen Q W, Chen D. Ecological hydrograph based on Schizothorax chongi habitat conservation in the dewatered river channel between Jinping cascaded dams. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 54–63
11. King J, Brown C, Sabet H. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Res Appl, 2003, 19: 619–63910.1002/rra.709 ↗
12. Kingsford R T. Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol, 2000, 25: 109–12710.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x ↗
13. Richter B D, Mathews R, Harrison D L, et al. Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecol Appl, 2003, 13: 206–22410.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2 ↗
14. Turak E, Koop K. Multi-attribute ecological river typology for assessing ecological condition and conservation planning. Hydrobiologia, 2008, 603: 83–10410.1007/s10750-007-9249-0 ↗
15. Ding Y, Xiao Y, Zhong D Y. Numerical simulation of pollution process due to resuspension of bed materials adsorbing pollutants in alluvial rivers. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1280–128810.1007/s11431-015-5845-9 ↗
16. Wang L H, Yan D H, Wang H, et al. Impact of the Yalong-Yellow River water transfer project on the eco-environment in Yalong River Basin. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 831–84210.1007/s11431-013-5155-z ↗
17. Arthington A H, Bunn S E, Poff N L, et al. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl, 2006, 16: 1311–810.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2 ↗
18. Alcázar J, Palau A, Vega-Garci’A C. A neural net model for environmental flow estimation at the Ebro River Basin, Spain. J Hydrol, 2008, 349: 44–5510.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.024 ↗
19. Alcázar J, Palau A. Establishing environmental flow regimes in a Mediterranean watershed based on a regional classification. J Hydrol, 2010, 388: 41–5110.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.026 ↗
20. Kennard M J, Pusey B J, Olden J D, et al. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshwater Biol, 2010, 55: 171–19310.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02307.x ↗
21. Haines A T, Finlayson B L, McMahon T A. A global classification of river regimes. Appl Geog, 1988, 8: 255–27210.1016/0143-6228(88)90035-5 ↗
22. Hughes J M R, James B. A hydrological regionalization of streams in Victoria, Australia, with implications for stream ecology. Aust J Mar Fresh, 1989, 40: 303–32610.1071/MF9890303 ↗
23. Poff N L, Ward J V. Implication of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: A regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can Fish Aquat Sci, 1989, 46: 1805–181810.1139/f89-228 ↗
24. Harris N M, Gurnell A M, Hannah D M, et al. Classification of river regimes: A context for hydroecology. Hydrol Process, 2000, 14: 2831–2848.10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2831::AID-HYP122>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
25. Snelder H T, Biggs F B, Woods R A. Improved ecohydrological classification of rivers. River Res Appl, 2005, 21: 609–62810.1002/rra.826 ↗
26. Leigh C, Sheldon F. Hydrological changes and ecological impacts associated with water resource development in large floodplain rivers in the Australian tropics. River Res Appl, 2008, 24: 1251–127010.1002/rra.1125 ↗
27. Belmar O, Velasco J, Martinez-Capel F. Hydrological classification of natural flow regimes to support environmental flow assessments in intensively regulated mediterranean rivers, Segura River Basin (Spain). Environ Manage, 2011, 47: 992–100410.1007/s00267-011-9661-0 ↗
28. Zhang Y, Arthington A H, Bunn S E, et al. Classification of flow regimes for environmental flow assessment in regulated rivers: The Huai River Basin, China. River Res Appl, 2012, 28: 989–100510.1002/rra.1483 ↗
29. Harris N M, Gurnell A M, Hannah D M, et al. Classification of river regimes: A context for hydroecology. Hydrol Process, 2000, 14: 2831–284810.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2831::AID-HYP122>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
30. Reidy Liermann C A, Olden J D, Beechie T J, et al. Hydrogeomorphic classification of Washington State rivers to support emerging environmental flow management strategies. River Res Appl, 2012, 28: 1340–135810.1002/rra.1541 ↗
31. Dobson A P, Bradshaw A D, Baker A J M. Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science, 1997, 277: 515–52210.1126/science.277.5325.515 ↗
32. Thorp J H, Thoms M C, Delong M D. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res Appl, 2006, 22: 123–14710.1002/rra.901 ↗
33. Vörösmarty C J, McIntyre P B, Gessner M O, et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 2010, 467: 555–56110.1038/nature09440 ↗
34. Nadon M J, Metcalfe R A, Williams C J, et al. Assessing the effects of dams and waterpower facilities on riverine dissolved organic matter composition. Hydrobiologia, 2015, 744: 145–16410.1007/s10750-014-2069-0 ↗
35. Hu Q F, Yang D W, Wang Y T, et al. Accuracy and spatio-temporal variation of high resolution satellite rainfall estimate over the Ganjiang River Basin. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 853–86510.1007/s11431-013-5176-7 ↗
36. Zheng Z, Lu W X, Chu H B, et al. Uncertainty analysis of hydrological model parameters based on the bootstrap method: A case study of the SWAT model applied to the Dongliao River Watershed, Jilin Province, Northeastern China. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 219–22910.1007/s11431-013-5385-0 ↗
37. Smakhtin V, Revenga C, Döll P. A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water Int, 2004, 29: 307–31710.1080/02508060408691785 ↗
38. Bragg O M, Black A R, Duck R W, et al. Approaching the physicalbiological interface in rivers: A review of methods for ecological evaluation of flow regimes. Prog Phys Geog, 2005, 29: 506–53110.1191/0309133305pp460ra ↗
39. Nilsson C, Reidy C A, Dynesius M, et al. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science, 2005, 308: 405–40810.1126/science.1107887 ↗
40. Yang T, Shao Q X, Hao Z C, et al. Regional frequency analysis and spatio-temporal pattern characterization of rainfall extremes in the Pearl River Basin, China. J Hydrol, 2010, 380: 386–40510.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.013 ↗
41. Wang L N, Chen X H, Li Y A. Rules of runoff variation of the West River basin (in Chinese). J China Hydrol, 2009, 29: 22–25
42. Zhang Q, Xu C Y, Yu Z, et al. Multifractal analysis of streamflow records of the East River basin (Pearl River), China. Physica A, 2009, 388: 927–93410.1016/j.physa.2008.11.025 ↗
43. Vanni M J, Layne C D. Nutrient recycling and herbivory as mechanisms in the “top-down” effect of fish on algae in lakes. Ecology, 1997, 78: 21–40
44. Leveque C. Role and consequences of fish diversity in the functioning of African freshwater ecosystems: A review. Aquat Living Resour, 1995, 8: 59–7810.1051/alr:1995005 ↗
45. Poff N L, Allan J D, Bain M B, et al. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 1997, 47: 769–78410.2307/1313099 ↗
46. Lee S, Kim J, Hur J W. Assessment of ecological flow rate by flow duration and environmental management class in the Geum River, Korea. Environ Earth Sci, 2013, 68: 1107–111810.1007/s12665-012-1812-y ↗
47. Wang J, Li C, Duan X, et al. Variation in the significant environmental factors affecting larval abundance of four major Chinese carp species: Fish spawning response to the three gorges dam. Freshwater Biol, 2014, 59: 1343–136010.1111/fwb.12348 ↗
48. Shang S. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to estimate minimum environmental flows based on wetted perimeter. River Res Appl, 2007, 24: 54–6710.1002/rra.1047 ↗
49. Liu T R, Deng W X, Xu Z X, et al. Analysis on fishery status on the western backward positon of Pearl River (in Chinese). Chinese Fish Econ, 2008, 2: 87–87.
50. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute. Fishway. Beijing: Electric Power Press, 1982. 6–11
51. Tan X C, Li X H, Lin J Z, et al. Ecological differentiation between two breeding populations of Megalobrama hoffmanni in the Pearl River based on hydro-acoustic research (in Chinese). Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 1756–1762
52. Long G H, Lin G, Hu D S, et al. The reproductive biology of barbell chub (in Chinese). Chinese J Zool, 2005, 40: 28–36
53. Raleigh R F. Habitat suitability index models: Brook trout. Center for Integrated Data Analytics Wisconsin Science Center, 1982
54. Wang J, Dong Z, Liao W, et al. An environmental flow assessment method based on the relationships between flow and ecological response: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir and its downstream reach. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1471–148410.1007/s11431-013-5193-6 ↗
55. Jacobson R B, Galat D L. Design of a naturalised flow regime—an example from the lower Missouri River, USA. Ecohydrology, 2008, 1: 81–10410.1002/eco.9 ↗
56. Stamou A I, Hadjibiros K, Andreadakis A, et al. Establishing minimum water level for Plastiras reservoir (Greece) combining water quality modelling with landscape aesthetics. Environ Model Assess, 2007, 12: 157–17010.1007/s10666-006-9058-2 ↗
57. Puri M L, Ralescu D A. Differentials of fuzzy functions. J Math Anal Appl, 1983, 91: 552–55810.1016/0022-247X(83)90169-5 ↗
58. Dickerson J A, Kosko B. Fuzzy function approximation with ellipsoidal rules. IEEE T Syst Man Cy B, 1996, 26: 542–56010.1109/3477.517030 ↗
59. Eriksson O. The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity. Oikos, 1993, 68: 371–37410.2307/3544854 ↗
60. Aarssen L W, Schamp B S. Predicting distributions of species richness and species size in regional floras: Applying the species pool hypothesis to the habitat templet model. Perspect Plant Ecol, 2002, 5: 3–1210.1078/1433-8319-00020 ↗
61. Zhong X, Xu G, Wang Y, et al. An approach to determination of functional species pool for community research. Ecol Indic, 2014, 46: 78–8310.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.009 ↗
62. Shang S. Lake surface area method to define minimum ecological lake level from level-area-storage curves. J Arid Land, 2013, 5: 133–14210.1007/s40333-013-0153-3 ↗