Free-standing β-Ta2O5/SWCNTs composite film for high-rate Li-ion storage
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid development of portable and wearable electronic devices is responding to the urgent demand for high-efficiency flexible energy storage devices. Flexible supercapacitors, showing long cycle life, high power density, and good safety, are considered ideal candidates. Nevertheless, the relatively low energy density restricts their practical applications. With a large dielectric constant of 18–46, Ta2O5-based materials typically exhibit excellent electron-binding ability, which is critical for enhancing the energy density of supercapacitors. In this work, the free-standing β-Ta2O5/single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) composite film was prepared, with a high β-Ta2O5 loading of over 70%. By anchoring β-Ta2O5 nanoparticles onto the surface of SWCNTs, the system’s flexibility and conductivity were significantly enhanced, which also facilitated the intercalation electrodynamics of metal cations. As a result, the flexible β-Ta2O5/SWCNTs film exhibits excellent Li-ion storage performance, with a high volumetric specific capacitance of 392.3 F cm−3 at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1 and 198.9 F cm−3 at 500 mV s−1. In addition, the asymmetric device, assembled by the β-Ta2O5/SWCNTs and activated carbon films, shows a high energy density of 45.5 Wh kg−1 at the power density of 10.8 kW kg−1. This technique opens up a new avenue for improving the energy density and rate performance of flexible supercapacitors.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Li J, Miao C, Bian J, et al. MXene fibers for electronic textiles: Progress and perspectives. Chin Chem Lett, 2023, 34: 10799610.1016/j.cclet.2022.107996 ↗
2. Cao Y, Guo Y, Chen Z, et al. Highly sensitive self-powered pressure and strain sensor based on crumpled MXene film for wireless human motion detection. Nano Energy, 2022, 92: 10668910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106689 ↗
3. Pomerantseva E, Bonaccorso F, Feng X, et al. Energy storage: The future enabled by nanomaterials. Science, 2019, 366: eaan828510.1126/science.aan8285 ↗
4. Ling T, Da P, Zheng X, et al. Atomic-level structure engineering of metal oxides for high-rate oxygen intercalation pseudocapacitance. Sci Adv, 2018, 4: eaau626110.1126/sciadv.aau6261 ↗
5. Chen R, Tang H, Dai Y, et al. Robust bioinspired MXene-hemicellulose composite films with excellent electrical conductivity for multifunctional electrode applications. ACS Nano, 2022, 16: 19124–1913210.1021/acsnano.2c08163 ↗
6. Sun J, Chang Y, Dong L, et al. MXene enhanced self-powered alternating current electroluminescence devices for patterned flexible displays. Nano Energy, 2021, 86: 10607710.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106077 ↗
7. Yang Y, Gao W. Wearable and flexible electronics for continuous molecular monitoring. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 1465–149110.1039/C7CS00730B ↗
8. Li M, Lu J, Chen Z, et al. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
9. Blomgren G E. The development and future of lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc, 2017, 164: A5019–A502510.1149/2.0251701jes ↗
10. Guo X, He G. Opportunities and challenges of zinc anodes in rechargeable aqueous batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2023, 11: 11987–1200110.1039/D3TA01904G ↗
11. Nitta N, Wu F, Lee J T, et al. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater Today, 2015, 18: 252–26410.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
12. Tarascon J M, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 2001, 414: 359–36710.1038/35104644 ↗
13. Wu Q, He T, Zhang Y, et al. Cyclic stability of supercapacitors: Materials, energy storage mechanism, test methods, and device. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 24094–2414710.1039/D1TA06815F ↗
14. Wei Q, DeBlock R H, Butts D M, et al. Pseudocapacitive vanadium-based materials toward high-rate sodium-ion storage. Energy Environ Mater, 2020, 3: 221–23410.1002/eem2.12131 ↗
15. Burke A. Ultracapacitors: Why, how and where is the technology. J Power Sources, 2000, 91: 37–5010.1016/S0378-7753(00)00485-7 ↗
16. Jiang Y, Liu J. Definitions of pseudocapacitive materials: A brief review. Energy Environ Mater, 2019, 2: 30–3710.1002/eem2.12028 ↗
17. Liu J, Wang J, Xu C, et al. Advanced energy storage devices: Basic principles, analytical methods, and rational materials design. Adv Sci, 2018, 5: 170032210.1002/advs.201700322 ↗
18. Wang F, Wu X, Yuan X, et al. Latest advances in supercapacitors: From new electrode materials to novel device designs. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46: 6816–685410.1039/C7CS00205J ↗
19. Salanne M, Rotenberg B, Naoi K, et al. Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors. Nat Energy, 2016, 1: 110.1038/nenergy.2016.70 ↗
20. Zhang Q, Kong Y Q, Gao K X, et al. Research progress on space charge layer effect in lithium-ion solid-state battery. Sci China Technol Sci, 2022, 65: 2246–225810.1007/s11431-021-2027-3 ↗
21. Simon P, Gogotsi Y. Perspectives for electrochemical capacitors and related devices. Nat Mater, 2020, 19: 1151–116310.1038/s41563-020-0747-z ↗
22. Hou J Y, Wang Y, Yang W H, et al. Application of MXenes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Sci China Technol Sci, 2022, 65: 2259–227310.1007/s11431-021-2077-5 ↗
23. Béguin F, Presser V, Balducci A, et al. Carbons and electrolytes for advanced supercapacitors. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2219–225110.1002/adma.201304137 ↗
24. Tan R K L, Reeves S P, Hashemi N, et al. Graphene as a flexible electrode: Review of fabrication approaches. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 17777–1780310.1039/C7TA05759H ↗
25. Wu Y, Zhao X, Shang Y, et al. Application-driven carbon nanotube functional materials. ACS Nano, 2021, 15: 7946–797410.1021/acsnano.0c10662 ↗
26. Zhang P, Zhu Q, Soomro R A, et al. In situ ice template approach to fabricate 3D flexible MXene film-based electrode for high performance supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 200092210.1002/adfm.202000922 ↗
27. Latham K G, Edathil A A, Rezaei B, et al. Challenges and opportunities in free-standing supercapacitors research. APL Mater, 2022, 10: 11090310.1063/5.0123453 ↗
28. Spencer M A, Augustyn V. Free-standing transition metal oxide electrode architectures for electrochemical energy storage. J Mater Sci, 2019, 54: 13045–1306910.1007/s10853-019-03823-y ↗
29. Divya M L, Lee Y S, Aravindan V. Solvent co-intercalation: An emerging mechanism in Li-, Na-, and K-Ion capacitors. ACS Energy Lett, 2021, 6: 4228–424410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01801 ↗
30. Liu Y, Jiang S P, Shao Z. Intercalation pseudocapacitance in electrochemical energy storage: Recent advances in fundamental understanding and materials development. Mater Today Adv, 2020, 7: 10007210.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100072 ↗
31. Huang H, Niederberger M. Towards fast-charging technologies in Li+/Na+ storage: From the perspectives of pseudocapacitive materials and non-aqueous hybrid capacitors. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 19225–1924010.1039/C9NR05732C ↗
32. Wang Y, Song Y, Xia Y. Electrochemical capacitors: Mechanism, materials, systems, characterization and applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45: 5925–595010.1039/C5CS00580A ↗
33. Kim J W, Augustyn V, Dunn B. The effect of crystallinity on the rapid pseudocapacitive response of Nb2O5. Adv Energy Mater, 2012, 2: 141–14810.1002/aenm.201100494 ↗
34. Come J, Augustyn V, Kim J W, et al. Electrochemical kinetics of nanostructured Nb2O5 electrodes. J Electrochem Soc, 2014, 161: A718–A72510.1149/2.040405jes ↗
35. Augustyn V, Come J, Lowe M A, et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat Mater, 2013, 12: 518–52210.1038/nmat3601 ↗
36. Wang X, Mathis T S, Li K, et al. Influences from solvents on charge storage in titanium carbide MXenes. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 241–24810.1038/s41560-019-0339-9 ↗
37. Kim H S, Cook J B, Lin H, et al. Oxygen vacancies enhance pseudocapacitive charge storage properties of MoO3−x. Nat Mater, 2017, 16: 454–46010.1038/nmat4810 ↗
38. Ren W, Yang G D, Feng A L, et al. Annealing effects on the optical and electrochemical properties of tantalum pentoxide films. J Adv Ceram, 2021, 10: 704–71310.1007/s40145-021-0465-2 ↗
39. Wang B, Huang W, Chi L, et al. High-k gate dielectrics for emerging flexible and stretchable electronics. Chem Rev, 2018, 118: 5690–575410.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00045 ↗
40. Fu Z W, Huang F, Chu Y Q, et al. Characterization of amorphous Ta2O5 film as a novel anode material. J Electrochem Soc, 2003, 150: A77610.1149/1.1573194 ↗
41. Xia S, Ni J, Savilov S V, et al. Oxygen-deficient Ta2O5 nanoporous films as self-supported electrodes for lithium microbatteries. Nano Energy, 2018, 45: 407–41210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.026 ↗
42. Gao X, Wu H, Su C, et al. Recent advances in carbon-based nanomaterials for multivalent-ion hybrid capacitors: A review. Energy Environ Sci, 2023, 16: 1364–138310.1039/D2EE03719J ↗
43. Chen Z, Augustyn V, Jia X, et al. High-performance sodium-ion pseudocapacitors based on hierarchically porous nanowire composites. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 4319–432710.1021/nn300920e ↗
44. Tchoul M N, Ford W T, Lolli G, et al. Effect of mild nitric acid oxidation on dispersability, size, and structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater, 2007, 19: 5765–577210.1021/cm071758l ↗
45. Shearer C J, Cherevan A, Eder D. Application and future challenges of functional nanocarbon hybrids. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2295–231810.1002/adma.201305254 ↗
46. Cherevan A, Gebhardt P, Kunzmann A, et al. Beware of doping: Ta2O5 nanotube photocatalyst using CNTs as hard templates. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2018, 1: 1259–126710.1021/acsaem.8b00006 ↗
47. Sathasivam S, Williamson B A D, Kafizas A, et al. Computational and experimental study of Ta2O5 thin films. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121: 202–21010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11073 ↗
48. Xu C, Xiao Q, Ma J, et al. High temperature annealing effect on structure, optical property and laser-induced damage threshold of Ta2O5 films. Appl Surf Sci, 2008, 254: 6554–655910.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.034 ↗
49. Hiratani M, Kimura S, Hamada T, et al. Hexagonal polymorph of tantalum-pentoxide with enhanced dielectric constant. Appl Phys Lett, 2002, 81: 2433–243510.1063/1.1509861 ↗
50. Li J, Kurra N, Seredych M, et al. Bipolar carbide-carbon high voltage aqueous lithium-ion capacitors. Nano Energy, 2019, 56: 151–15910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.042 ↗
51. Choi C, Ashby D S, Butts D M, et al. Achieving high energy density and high power density with pseudocapacitive materials. Nat Rev Mater, 2020, 5: 5–1910.1038/s41578-019-0142-z ↗
52. Molinnus D, Iken H, Johnen A L, et al. Miniaturized pH-sensitive field-effect capacitors with ultrathin Ta2O5 films prepared by atomic layer deposition. Physica Status Solidi (a), 2022, 219: 210066010.1002/pssa.202100660 ↗
53. Shao Y, El-Kady M F, Sun J, et al. Design and mechanisms of asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem Rev, 2018, 118: 9233–928010.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00252 ↗
54. Abebe E M, Ujihara M. Simultaneous electrodeposition of ternary metal oxide nanocomposites for high-efficiency supercapacitor applications. ACS Omega, 2022, 7: 17161–1717410.1021/acsomega.2c00826 ↗
55. Tomar A K, Kshetri T, Kim N H, et al. Cation and anion (de)intercalation into MXene/Perovskite oxides for high-rate intercalation pseudocapacitance. Energy Storage Mater, 2022, 50: 86–9510.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.012 ↗
56. Feng R, Li M, Wang Y, et al. High-performance multi-dimensional nitrogen-doped N+MnO2@TiC/C electrodes for supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta, 2021, 370: 13771610.1016/j.electacta.2021.137716 ↗
57. Tian Y, Lin L, Chen S, et al. Defects engineering of Fe2O3@Sn2O3 nanosheet arrays for high-performance hybrid supercapacitor. J Energy Storage, 2021, 42: 10312310.1016/j.est.2021.103123 ↗
58. Jiang S, Yang B, Lu Y, et al. An aqueous symmetrical supercapacitor with high bulk pseudocapacitance induced by phase transformation of MnO2. J Alloys Compd, 2021, 876: 16014810.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160148 ↗