Engineering-adaptive electrochemical modeling for fault diagnosis in electric vehicle energy storage systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical models offer great potential for onboard monitoring of lithium-ion batteries, yet their complexity and dependence on high-quality data have limited their engineering deployment. To address this challenge, this paper proposed an engineering-adaptive modelling framework that enabled reduced-order electrochemical models to remain accurate and robust under temperature variations and battery aging in real-world vehicle operation. The framework was developed by applying a transfer-function-based reduction of the single particle model with electrolyte dynamics (SPMe) model and reformulating it into a state-space structure, supporting real-time iteration and internal state tracking. Furthermore, a practical parameter identification scheme was introduced, combining interpolation-enhanced preprocessing, long-term open-circuit voltage extraction, and polarization resistance estimation. This allowed one-shot particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based parameter identification using sparse onboard data, where PSO adaptively estimated internal parameters from voltage trends. The resulting lightweight process supported periodic updates and cross-platform deployment. While only three cells were used for initial parameter identification, the model was validated across 96 cells in the full battery pack, demonstrating scalability and long-term stability, with average residuals maintained around 12 mV throughout a full year of cross-seasonal operation. Based on residual trend analysis, a fault diagnosis method was further developed to detect and isolate subtle faults such as data loss and micro-overcharge. The results highlighted the framework’s diagnostic capability and engineering adaptability, providing a practical path for the large-scale deployment of physics-based battery models in real vehicles.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang J, Che Y, Teodorescu R, et al. Energy storage management in electric vehicles. Nat Rev Clean Technol, 2025, 1: 161–17510.1038/s44359-024-00020-2 ↗
2. Wang Y, Ni R, Jiang X, et al. An electrochemical-mechanical coupled multi-scale modeling method and full-field stress distribution of lithium-ion battery. Appl Energy, 2023, 347: 12144410.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121444 ↗
3. Tao H, Wang S, Liu H, et al. Deep neural network enhanced mesoscopic thermodynamic model for unlocking the electrode/electrolyte interface. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2025, 64: e20241844710.1002/anie.202418447 ↗
4. Huang P, Leng Y, Lian C, et al. Porous-deepONet: Learning the solution operators of parametric reactive transport equations in porous media. Engineering, 2024, 39: 94–10310.1016/j.eng.2024.07.002 ↗
5. Jiao M, Huang P, Pang Z, et al. Uncovering the battery direct current internal resistance puzzle: A machine learning-driven pore network approach. J Power Sour, 2025, 628: 23589110.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235891 ↗
6. Doyle M, Fuller T F, Newman J. Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J Electrochem Soc, 1993, 140: 1526–153310.1149/1.2221597 ↗
7. Liu K, Gao Y, Zhu C, et al. Electrochemical modeling and parameterization towards control-oriented management of lithium-ion batteries. Control Eng Pract, 2022, 124: 10517610.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105176 ↗
8. El-Dalahmeh M, Al-Greer M, El-Dalahmeh M, et al. Physics-based model informed smooth particle filter for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Measurement, 2023, 214: 11283810.1016/j.measurement.2023.112838 ↗
9. Khodadadi Sadabadi K, Jin X, Rizzoni G. Prediction of remaining useful life for a composite electrode lithium ion battery cell using an electrochemical model to estimate the state of health. J Power Sour, 2021, 481: 22886110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228861 ↗
10. Gao T, Lu W. Reduced-order electrochemical models with shape functions for fast, accurate prediction of lithium-ion batteries under high C-rates. Appl Energy, 2024, 353: 12195410.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121954 ↗
11. Moreno H T, Schaum A. Reduced-order electrochemical modelling of lithium-ion batteries. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, 55: 103–10810.1016/j.ifacol.2023.01.056 ↗
12. Deng Z, Hu X, Lin X, et al. A reduced-order electrochemical model for all-solid-state batteries. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific, 2020, 7: 464–47310.1109/TTE.2020.3026962 ↗
13. Li W, Fan Y, Ringbeck F, et al. Electrochemical model-based state estimation for lithium-ion batteries with adaptive unscented Kalman filter. J Power Sour, 2020, 476: 22853410.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228534 ↗
14. Sturm J, Ennifar H, Erhard S V, et al. State estimation of lithium-ion cells using a physicochemical model based extended Kalman filter. Appl Energy, 2018, 223: 103–12310.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.011 ↗
15. Li Y, Karunathilake D, Vilathgamuwa D M, et al. Model order reduction techniques for physics-based lithium-ion battery management: A survey. EEE Ind Electron Mag, 2021, 16: 36–5110.1109/MIE.2021.3100318 ↗
16. Khaleghi Rahimian S, Rayman S, White R E. Extension of physics-based single particle model for higher charge-discharge rates. J Power Sour, 2013, 224: 180–19410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.084 ↗
17. Guo F, Couto L D, Mulder G, et al. A systematic review of electrochemical model-based lithium-ion battery state estimation in battery management systems. J Energy Storage, 2024, 101: 11385010.1016/j.est.2024.113850 ↗
18. Rodríguez A, Plett G L, Trimboli M S. Comparing four model-order reduction techniques, applied to lithium-ion battery-cell internal electrochemical transfer functions. eTransportation, 2019, 1: 10000910.1016/j.etran.2019.100009 ↗
19. Hosseininasab S, Lin C, Pischinger S, et al. State-of-health estimation of lithium-ion batteries for electrified vehicles using a reduced-order electrochemical model. J Energy Storage, 2022, 52: 10468410.1016/j.est.2022.104684 ↗
20. Hosseinzadeh E, Genieser R, Worwood D, et al. A systematic approach for electrochemical-thermal modelling of a large format lithium-ion battery for electric vehicle application. J Power Sour, 2018, 382: 77–9410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.027 ↗
21. Xiong R, Li L, Li Z, et al. An electrochemical model based degradation state identification method of lithium-ion battery for all-climate electric vehicles application. Appl Energy, 2018, 219: 264–27510.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.053 ↗
22. Nicodemo N, Di Rienzo R, Lagnoni M, et al. Estimation of lithiumion battery electrochemical properties from equivalent circuit model parameters using machine learning. J Energy Storage, 2024, 99: 11325710.1016/j.est.2024.113257 ↗
23. Liu J, Yadav S, Salman M, et al. Review of thermal coupled battery models and parameter identification for lithium-ion battery heat generation in EV battery thermal management system. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2024, 218: 12474810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124748 ↗
24. Oca L, Miguel E, Agirrezabala E, et al. Physico-chemical parameter measurement and model response evaluation for a pseudo-two-dimensional model of a commercial lithium-ion battery. Electrochim Acta, 2021, 382: 13828710.1016/j.electacta.2021.138287 ↗
25. Kim J, Chun H, Baek J, et al. Parameter identification of lithium-ion battery pseudo-2-dimensional models using genetic algorithm and neural network cooperative optimization. J Energy Storage, 2022, 45: 10357110.1016/j.est.2021.103571 ↗
26. Li J, Li X, Yuan X, et al. Deep learning method for online parameter identification of lithium-ion batteries using electrochemical synthetic data. Energy Storage Mater, 2024, 72: 10369710.1016/j.ensm.2024.103697 ↗
27. Rahman M A, Anwar S, Izadian A. Electrochemical model parameter identification of a lithium-ion battery using particle swarm optimization method. J Power Sour, 2016, 307: 86–9710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.083 ↗
28. Xu Y, Ge X, Guo R, et al. Recent advances in model-based fault diagnosis for lithium-ion batteries: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2025, 207: 11492210.1016/j.rser.2024.114922 ↗
29. Firoozi R, Sattarzadeh S, Dey S. Cylindrical battery fault detection under extreme fast charging: A physics-based learning approach. IEEE Trans Energy Convers, 2021, 37: 1241–125010.1109/TEC.2021.3112950 ↗
30. Kong X, Plett G L, Scott Trimboli M, et al. Pseudo-two-dimensional model and impedance diagnosis of micro internal short circuit in lithium-ion cells. J Energy Storage, 2020, 27: 10108510.1016/j.est.2019.101085 ↗
31. Merla Y, Wu B, Yufit V, et al. An easy-to-parameterise physics-informed battery model and its application towards lithium-ion battery cell design, diagnosis, and degradation. J Power Sour, 2018, 384: 66–7910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.065 ↗
32. Ma R, Deng Y, Wang X. Simplified electrochemical model assisted detection of the early-stage internal short circuit through battery aging. J Energy Storage, 2023, 66: 10747810.1016/j.est.2023.107478 ↗
33. Brosa Planella F, Ai W, Boyce A M, et al. A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed. Prog Energy, 2022, 4: 04200310.1088/2516-1083/ac7d31 ↗
34. Xie Y, Cheng X. A new solution to the spherical particle surface concentration of lithium-ion battery electrodes. Electrochim Acta, 2021, 399: 13939110.1016/j.electacta.2021.139391 ↗
35. Xie Y, Cheng X. Approximate solutions for determining electrolyte concentrations in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc, 2022, 169: 06351610.1149/1945-7111/ac7751 ↗
36. Xie Y, Wang S, Wang Z, et al. A novel order-reduced thermal-coupling electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries. Chin Phys B, 2024, 33: 05820310.1088/1674-1056/ad1f52 ↗
37. Baba N, Yoshida H, Nagaoka M, et al. Numerical simulation of thermal behavior of lithium-ion secondary batteries using the enhanced single particle model. J Power Sour, 2014, 252: 214–22810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.111 ↗
38. Farmann A, Sauer D U. A study on the dependency of the open-circuit voltage on temperature and actual aging state of lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sour, 2017, 347: 1–1310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.098 ↗
39. Li K, Tseng K J. Energy efficiency of lithium-ion battery used as energy storage devices in micro-grid. In: Proceedings of the IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Yokohama: IEEE, 2015. 5235–5240
40. Wang L, Sun J, Cai Y, et al. A novel OCV curve reconstruction and update method of lithium-ion batteries at different temperatures based on cloud data. Energy, 2023, 268: 12677310.1016/j.energy.2023.126773 ↗
41. Zhu J, Knapp M, Liu X, et al. Low-temperature separating lithium-ion battery interfacial polarization based on distribution of relaxation times (DRT) of impedance. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific, 2020, 7: 410–42110.1109/TTE.2020.3028475 ↗
42. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth: IEEE, 1995. 1942–194810.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 ↗
43. Li C, Cui N, Wang C, et al. Reduced-order electrochemical model for lithium-ion battery with domain decomposition and polynomial approximation methods. Energy, 2021, 221: 11966210.1016/j.energy.2020.119662 ↗
44. Administration for Market Regulation. Dongfeng Motor Group recalls some Dongfeng EX1 and EX1 PRO electric vehicles. 2023-12-01. https://www.samrdprc.org.cn/qczh/gnzhqc/202312/t20231201_110394.html
45. Liu J, Peng W, Yang M, et al. Quantitative analysis of aging and detection of commercial 18650 lithium-ion battery under slight over-charging cycling. J Clean Prod, 2022, 340: 13075610.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130756 ↗
46. Zhu X, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Overcharge investigation of large format lithium-ion pouch cells with Li(Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2)O2 cathode for electric vehicles: Thermal runaway features and safety management method. Energy, 2019, 169: 868–88010.1016/j.energy.2018.12.041 ↗
47. Zhao H, Zhang C, Xu L, et al. A deep neural network for multi-fault diagnosis of battery packs based on an incremental voltage measurement topology. Energy, 2025, 316: 13459010.1016/j.energy.2025.134590 ↗