Gait trajectory planning and fixed-time fuzzy adaptive control for human-exoskeleton cooperative motion based on dynamic movement primitives
Source abstract
Abstract
A three-loop control strategy is developed for exoskeleton to reduce interaction torque and improve compliance control performance in human-exoskeleton collaborative movement. In the outer loop, dynamic movement primitives is employed to learn one demonstration trajectories of individual walking gaits and to generate the reference trajectory, which serves as the input for the admittance middle layer. In the middle layer, the admittance scheme is designed to determine the desired joint trajectory, which is then input to the inner position control loop of the exoskeleton. Due to model uncertainties in the position control loop, an adaptive fuzzy fixed-time controller is incorporated to approximate uncertain dynamics, and ensures that the exoskeleton’s state errors converge into a small neighborhood around zero within a finite period, regardless of original conditions. This three-loop control strategy has two key advantages: (1) the exoskeleton can identify individual gaits with varying physical features such as motion frequency and amplitude; (2) the operator wearable comfort is significantly improved based on human-exoskeleton impedance and synchronous motion indicators. Finally, both comparative simulations and experimental validations confirm the efficacy of the proposed control framework in achieving smooth and coordinated human-exoskeleton interactions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu X, Yuan Y, Zhang X, et al. Gait phase classification for a lower limb exoskeleton system based on a graph convolutional network model. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2022, 69: 4999–500810.1109/TIE.2021.3082067 ↗
2. Kou J, Wang Y, Chen Z, et al. Gait planning and multimodal humanexoskeleton cooperative control based on central pattern generator. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2024,: 1–11
3. Stulp F, Theodorou E A, Schaal S. Reinforcement learning with sequences of motion primitives for robust manipulation. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012, 28: 1360–137010.1109/TRO.2012.2210294 ↗
4. Yuan Y, Li Z, Zhao T, et al. DMP-based motion generation for a walking exoskeleton robot using reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 67: 3830–383910.1109/TIE.2019.2916396 ↗
5. Zou C, Huang R, Cheng H, et al. Adaptive gait planning for walking assistance lower limb exoskeletons in slope scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal: IEEE, 2019. 5083–508910.1109/ICRA.2019.8793863 ↗
6. Pahič R, Ridge B, Gams A, et al. Training of deep neural networks for the generation of dynamic movement primitives. Neural Netws, 2020, 127: 121–13110.1016/j.neunet.2020.04.010 ↗
7. Zhang Y, Li M, Yang C. Robot learning system based on dynamic movement primitives and neural network. Neurocomputing, 2021, 451: 205–21410.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.034 ↗
8. Ferraguti F, Talignani Landi C, Sabattini L, et al. A variable admittance control strategy for stable physical human-robot interaction. Int J Robot Res, 2019, 38: 747–76510.1177/0278364919840415 ↗
9. Wu Q, Chen Y. Variable admittance time-delay control of an upper limb rehabilitation robot based on human stiffness estimation. Mechatronics, 2023, 90: 10293510.1016/j.mechatronics.2022.102935 ↗
10. Landi C T, Ferraguti F, Sabattini L, et al. Admittance control parameter adaptation for physical human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Singapore: IEEE, 2017. 2911–2916
11. Kou J G, Wang Y X, Chen Z L, et al. Flexible assistance strategy of lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton based on admittance model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2024, 67: 823–83410.1007/s11431-023-2541-x ↗
12. Samuel K, Haninger K, Oboe R, et al. Outer-loop admittance and motion control dual improvement via a multi-function observer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2024, 71: 9339–935010.1109/TIE.2023.3317843 ↗
13. Mancisidor A, Zubizarreta A, Cabanes I, et al. Kinematical and dynamical modeling of a multipurpose upper limbs rehabilitation robot. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, 2018, 49: 374–38710.1016/j.rcim.2017.08.013 ↗
14. Yan Y, Chen Z, Huang C, et al. Human-exoskeleton coupling dynamics in the swing of lower limb. Appl Math Model, 2022, 104: 439–45410.1016/j.apm.2021.12.007 ↗
15. Yan Y, Chen Z, Huang C, et al. Modelling and analysis of coupling dynamics of swinging a lower limb exoskeleton. Nonlinear Dyn, 2023, 111: 1213–123410.1007/s11071-022-07876-8 ↗
16. Li Z, Huang B, Ye Z, et al. Physical human-robot interaction of a robotic exoskeleton by admittance control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2018, 65: 9614–962410.1109/TIE.2018.2821649 ↗
17. Yang C, Peng G, Li Y, et al. Neural networks enhanced adaptive admittance control of optimized robot-environment interaction. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2019, 49: 2568–257910.1109/TCYB.2018.2828654 ↗
18. Yu X, He W, Li Y, et al. Bayesian estimation of human impedance and motion intention for human-robot collaboration. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2021, 51: 1822–183410.1109/TCYB.2019.2940276 ↗
19. Wu Q, Chen Y. Adaptive cooperative control of a soft elbow rehabilitation exoskeleton based on improved joint torque estimation. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 184: 10974810.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109748 ↗
20. Han S, Wang H, Tian Y, et al. Time-delay estimation based computed torque control with robust adaptive RBF neural network compensator for a rehabilitation exoskeleton. ISA Trans, 2020, 97: 171–18110.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.030 ↗
21. Wang H, Liu P X, Zhao X, et al. Adaptive fuzzy finite-time control of nonlinear systems with actuator faults. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2020, 50: 1786–179710.1109/TCYB.2019.2902868 ↗
22. Bao J, Wang H, Liu P X, et al. Fuzzy finite-time tracking control for a class of nonaffine nonlinear systems with unknown dead zones. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2021, 51: 452–46310.1109/TSMC.2018.2871560 ↗
23. Polyakov A. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2012, 57: 2106–211010.1109/TAC.2011.2179869 ↗
24. Zhan H, Wang C, Guo Q, et al. Fixed-time event-triggered adaptive control of manipulator system with input deadzone and model uncertainty. Neurocomputing, 2024, 602: 12826510.1016/j.neucom.2024.128265 ↗
25. Liu Y, Zhang F, Huang P, et al. Fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multiagent systems under disturbance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2021, 51: 4883–489410.1109/TSMC.2019.2944392 ↗
26. Liu S, Wang H, Li T, et al. Adaptive neural fixed-time control for uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II, 2024, 71: 637–641
27. Qiao L, Zhang W. Trajectory tracking control of AUVs via adaptive fast nonsingular integral terminal sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2020, 16: 1248–125810.1109/TII.2019.2949007 ↗
28. Teng L, Gull M A, Bai S. PD-based fuzzy sliding mode control of a wheelchair exoskeleton robot. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2020, 25: 2546–255510.1109/TMECH.2020.2983520 ↗
29. Wang J, Wang C, Zhang C, et al. Fixed-time adaptive fuzzy event-triggered control for uncertain nonlinear systems with output constraint and actuator failures. Fuzzy Sets Syst, 2023, 467: 10856310.1016/j.fss.2023.108563 ↗
30. Ba D, Li Y X, Tong S. Fixed-time adaptive neural tracking control for a class of uncertain nonstrict nonlinear systems. Neurocomputing, 2019, 363: 273–28010.1016/j.neucom.2019.06.063 ↗
31. Chen M, Wang H, Liu X. Adaptive practical fixed-time tracking control with prescribed boundary constraints. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2021, 68: 1716–1726
32. Wang L X, Mendel J M. Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation, and orthogonal least-squares learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 1992, 3: 807–81410.1109/72.159070 ↗