journal article·2023-08

Toward a non-invasive cleaning of the wall painting using polyelectrolyte hydrogel

Qiang Li, Chao Wu, YaJun Peng, BingJian Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Developing advanced cleaning systems for the removal of unwanted layers from painted surfaces is still a challenging issue that needs to be addressed in the field of cultural heritage. In this work, we proposed the use of novel polyelectrolyte hydrogels prepared via free radical polymerization and freeze-thaw methods. Zwitterionic sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA) was cross-linked with methylacryloyloxyethyl trimethylammonium (DMC) through covalent bonding to yield zwitterionic polyelectrolyte poly(SBMA-co-DMC) (PSD). Introducing PSD into the polyvinyl alcohol/carboxymethyl chitosan (PVA/CMC) hydrogel network enhanced the intermolecular electrostatic interactions and changed the porous structure and swelling behaviors, thus leading to improved mechanical properties. The adsorption ability of the PVA/CMC/PSD polyelectrolyte hydrogels toward dyes (rhodamine B and congo red) and metal ions (Cu2+ and K+) varied with increasing amounts of PSD, which could be attributed to cationic PSD tuning the net charges in the hydrogel. The cleaning effectiveness of the PVA/CMC/PSD polyelectrolyte hydrogels was assessed on wall painting mock-ups coated with soil, red paint, and soluble salts, using microscopic and spectroscopic analyses. The results showed that the hydrogel adhered to rough surfaces and removed unwanted substances effectively without leaving determinable residues, providing a possible safe and efficient method for the cleaning of important artifacts.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Baglioni M, Poggi G, Chelazzi D, et al. Advanced materials in cultural heritage conservation. Molecules, 2021, 26: 396710.3390/molecules26133967 ↗
2. Gil M, Martins M R, Carvalho M L, et al. Microscopy and microanalysis of an extreme case of salt and biodegradation in 17th century wall paintings. Microsc Microanal, 2015, 21: 606–61610.1017/S1431927615000562 ↗
3. Baglioni M, Jàidar Benavides Y, Berti D, et al. An amine-oxide surfactant-based microemulsion for the cleaning of works of art. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2015, 440: 204–21010.1016/j.jcis.2014.10.003 ↗
4. Baglioni M, Poggi G, Jaidar Benavides Y, et al. Nanostructured fluids for the removal of graffiti—A survey on 17 commercial spray-can paints. J Cultural Heritage, 2018, 34: 218–22610.1016/j.culher.2018.04.016 ↗
5. Baglioni P, Giorgi R, Chelazzi D. The degradation of wall paintings and stone: Specific ion effects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci, 2016, 23: 66–7110.1016/j.cocis.2016.06.011 ↗
6. Espinosa-Marzal R M, Scherer G W. Advances in understanding damage by salt crystallization. Acc Chem Res, 2010, 43: 897–90510.1021/ar9002224 ↗
7. Casoli A, Di Diego Z, Isca C. Cleaning painted surfaces: Evaluation of leaching phenomenon induced by solvents applied for the removal of gel residues. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2014, 21: 13252–1326310.1007/s11356-014-2658-5 ↗
8. Pflugfelder C, Mainusch N, Hammer I, et al. Cleaning of wall paintings and architectural surfaces by plasma. Plasma Process Polym, 2007, 4: S516–S52110.1002/ppap.200731218 ↗
9. Chelazzi D, Bordes R, Giorgi R, et al. The use of surfactants in the cleaning of works of art. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci, 2020, 45: 108–12310.1016/j.cocis.2019.12.007 ↗
10. Baij L, Hermans J, Ormsby B, et al. A review of solvent action on oil paint. Herit Sci, 2020, 8: 4310.1186/s40494-020-00388-x ↗
11. Chelazzi D, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Microemulsions, micelles, and functional gels: How colloids and soft matter preserve works of art. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 7296–730310.1002/anie.201710711 ↗
12. Giordano A, Caruso M R, Lazzara G. New tool for sustainable treatments: Agar spray—research and practice. Herit Sci, 2022, 10: 12310.1186/s40494-022-00756-9 ↗
13. Baglioni M, Raudino M, Berti D, et al. Nanostructured fluids from degradable nonionic surfactants for the cleaning of works of art from polymer contaminants. Soft Matter, 2014, 10: 6798–680910.1039/C4SM01084A ↗
14. Baglioni M, Guaragnone T, Mastrangelo R, et al. Nonionic surfactants for the cleaning of works of art: Insights on acrylic polymer films dewetting and artificial soil removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 26704–2671610.1021/acsami.0c06425 ↗
15. Cavallaro G, Milioto S, Lazzara G. Halloysite nanotubes: Interfacial properties and applications in cultural heritage. Langmuir, 2020, 36: 3677–368910.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00573 ↗
16. Lo Dico G, Semilia F, Milioto S, et al. Microemulsion encapsulated into halloysite nanotubes and their applications for cleaning of a marble surface. Appl Sci, 2018, 8: 145510.3390/app8091455 ↗
17. Yang Y P, Lian X D, Yang Z X, et al. Self-shaping microemulsion gels for cultural relic cleaning. Langmuir, 2021, 37: 11474–1148310.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01649 ↗
18. Cavallaro G, Milioto S, Nigamatzyanova L, et al. Pickering emulsion gels based on halloysite nanotubes and ionic biopolymers: Properties and cleaning action on marble surface. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2019, 2: 3169–317610.1021/acsanm.9b00487 ↗
19. Pianorsi M D, Raudino M, Bonelli N, et al. Organogels for the cleaning of artifacts. Pure Appl Chem, 2017, 89: 3–1710.1515/pac-2016-0908 ↗
20. Baglioni P, Bonelli N, Chelazzi D, et al. Organogel formulations for the cleaning of easel paintings. Appl Phys A, 2015, 121: 857–86810.1007/s00339-015-9364-0 ↗
21. Baglioni M, Domingues J A L, Carretti E, et al. Complex fluids confined into semi-interpenetrated chemical hydrogels for the cleaning of classic art: A rheological and SAXS study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 19162–1917210.1021/acsami.8b01841 ↗
22. Mastrangelo R, Chelazzi D, Poggi G, et al. Twin-chain polymer hydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol) as new advanced tool for the cleaning of modern and contemporary art. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 7011–702010.1073/pnas.1911811117 ↗
23. Rosciardi V, Chelazzi D, Baglioni P. “Green” biocomposite poly (vinyl alcohol)/starch cryogels as new advanced tools for the cleaning of artifacts. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2022, 613: 697–70810.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.145 ↗
24. Al-Emam E, Soenen H, Caen J, et al. Characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-borax/agarose (PVA-B/AG) double network hydrogel utilized for the cleaning of works of art. Herit Sci, 2020, 8: 10610.1186/s40494-020-00447-3 ↗
25. Zhu J M, Wang J P, Wang J, et al. Effectively removing animal glue coated on the surface of ancient mural via dissolution of PVA hydrogel induced by thermal treatment. J Cultural Heritage, 2022, 55: 179–18410.1016/j.culher.2022.03.009 ↗
26. Al-Emam E, Motawea A G, Janssens K, et al. Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol-borax/agarose (PVA-B/AG) blend hydrogels for removal of deteriorated consolidants from ancient Egyptian wall paintings. Herit Sci, 2019, 7: 2210.1186/s40494-019-0264-z ↗
27. Mazzuca C, Severini L, Domenici F, et al. Polyvinyl alcohol based hydrogels as new tunable materials for application in the cultural heritage field. Colloids Surfs B-Biointerfaces, 2020, 188: 11077710.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110777 ↗
28. Stagno V, Genova C, Zoratto N, et al. Single-sided portable NMR investigation to assess and monitor cleaning action of PVA-borax hydrogel in travertine and Lecce stone. Molecules, 2021, 26: 369710.3390/molecules26123697 ↗
29. Shao Q, Jiang S Y. Molecular understanding and design of zwitterionic materials. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 15–2610.1002/adma.201404059 ↗
30. Mi L, Jiang S Y. Integrated antimicrobial and nonfouling zwitterionic polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 1746–175410.1002/anie.201304060 ↗
31. Erathodiyil N, Chan H M, Wu H, et al. Zwitterionic polymers and hydrogels for antibiofouling applications in implantable devices. Mater Today, 2020, 38: 84–9810.1016/j.mattod.2020.03.024 ↗
32. Blackman L D, Gunatillake P A, Cass P, et al. An introduction to zwitterionic polymer behavior and applications in solution and at surfaces. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 757–77010.1039/C8CS00508G ↗
33. Zhang L, Cao Z Q, Bai T, et al. Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31: 553–55610.1038/nbt.2580 ↗
34. Jiang S Y, Cao Z Q. Ultralow-fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 920–93210.1002/adma.200901407 ↗
35. Jiang K, Zhou X S, He T. The synthesis ofbacterial cellulose-chitosan zwitterionic hydrogels with pH responsiveness for drug release mechanism of the naproxen. Int J Biol Macromolecules, 2022, 209: 814–82410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.216 ↗
36. Zhang Z X, Gao Y, Gao Y Y, et al. A self-adhesive, self-healing zwitterionic hydrogel electrolyte for high-voltage zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitors. Chem Eng J, 2023, 452: 13901410.1016/j.cej.2022.139014 ↗
37. Liu Y Q, Liu Q Y, Zhong L, et al. Tough, antifreezing, and conductive double network zwitterionic-based hydrogel for flexible sensors. Chem Eng J, 2022, 452: 13931410.1016/j.cej.2022.139314 ↗
38. Xu T J, Zhang L, Song B W, et al. High-strain sensitive zwitterionic hydrogels with swelling-resistant and controllable rehydration for sustainable wearable sensor. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2022, 620: 14–2310.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.125 ↗
39. Wang J P, Ning J Q, Li S H, et al. Multipurpose of zwitterionic poly (imidazolium)-based hydrogel coating for oil/water separation with long-term antibiofouling property. Sep Purif Technol, 2022, 295: 12135310.1016/j.seppur.2022.121353 ↗
40. Wei R, Song W Y, Yang F, et al. Bidirectionally pH-responsive zwitterionic polymer hydrogels with switchable selective adsorption capacities for anionic and cationic dyes. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2018, 57: 8209–821910.1021/acs.iecr.8b01027 ↗
41. Dai Z B, Zhang Y H, Chen C, et al. An antifouling and antimicrobial zwitterionic nanocomposite hydrogel dressing for enhanced wound healing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2021, 7: 1621–163010.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00039 ↗
42. Wang J T, Wang L F, Wu C S, et al. Antibacterial zwitterionic polyelectrolyte hydrogel adhesives with adhesion strength mediated by electrostatic mismatch. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 46816–4682610.1021/acsami.0c14959 ↗
43. Zheng S Y, Mao S H, Yuan J F, et al. Molecularly engineered zwitterionic hydrogels with high toughness and self-healing capacity for soft electronics applications. Chem Mater, 2021, 33: 8418–842910.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02781 ↗
44. Wan Ngah W S, Liang K H. Adsorption ofgold(III) ions onto chitosan and n-carboxymethyl chitosan: Equilibrium studies. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1999, 38: 1411–141410.1021/ie9803164 ↗
45. Yang J, Li M, Wang Y F, et al. High-strength physically multi-cross-linked chitosan hydrogels and aerogels for removing heavy-metal ions. J Agric Food Chem, 2019, 67: 13648–1365710.1021/acs.jafc.9b05063 ↗
46. Eltaweil A S, El-Tawil A M, Abd El-Monaem E M, et al. Zero valent iron nanoparticle-loaded nanobentonite intercalated carboxymethyl chitosan for efficient removal of both anionic and cationic dyes. ACS Omega, 2021, 6: 6348–636010.1021/acsomega.0c06251 ↗
47. Mohammadzadeh Pakdel P, Peighambardoust S J. Review on recent progress in chitosan-based hydrogels for wastewater treatment application. Carbohydr Polym, 2018, 201: 264–27910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.070 ↗
48. Chen X G, Park H J. Chemical characteristics of O-carboxymethyl chitosans related to the preparation conditions. Carbohydr Polym, 2003, 53: 355–35910.1016/S0144-8617(03)00051-1 ↗
49. Holloway J L, Lowman A M, Palmese G R. The role of crystallization and phase separation in the formation of physically cross-linked PVA hydrogels. Soft Matter, 2013, 9: 826–83310.1039/C2SM26763B ↗
50. de Abreu F R, Campana-Filho S P. Characteristics and properties of carboxymethylchitosan. Carbohydr Polym, 2009, 75: 214–22110.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.009 ↗
51. Lu S, Fu B H, Zhang Z H. Zwitterionic polymers coating anti-biofouling photoelectrochemical aptasensor for in vivo antibiotic metabolism monitoring and tracking. Anal Chem, 2022, 94: 14509–1451610.1021/acs.analchem.2c03465 ↗
52. Olejnik A, Ficek M, Szkodo M, et al. Tailoring diffusional fields in zwitterion/dopamine copolymer electropolymerized at carbon nano-walls for sensitive recognition of neurotransmitters. ACS Nano, 2022, 16: 13183–1319810.1021/acsnano.2c06406 ↗
53. Yin H S, Song P Q, Chen X Y, et al. Smart pH-sensitive hydrogel based on the pineapple peel-oxidized hydroxyethyl cellulose and the Hericium erinaceus residue carboxymethyl chitosan for use in drug delivery. Biomacromolecules, 2022, 23: 253–26410.1021/acs.biomac.1c01239 ↗