journal article·2017-08

Aerodynamic/mechanism optimization of a variable camber Fowler flap for general aviation aircraft

Yun Tian, Tao Wang, PeiQing Liu, PeiHua Feng

Publisher page

Abstract

A conventional Fowler flap is designed to improve the take-off and landing performances of an aircraft. Because the flight states of general aviation aircraft vary significantly. A Fowler flap with a double-sliding track has been designed, which is capable of changing airfoil camber while cruising and climbing as well as meeting low-speed performance requirements. The aerodynamic characteristics of the variable camber Fowler flap were studied by computational simulation, and cambering was found to be beneficial for improving the lift-to-drag ratio when the lift coefficient was larger than the critical value, below which decambering was more effective; this critical value differed somewhat under different conditions. Taking the mechanism into account, the take-off and landing configurations were optimized on the basis of the GA (W)-1 airfoil with a 30% chord Fowler flap. Compared with reference configuration, the maximum lift coefficient of optimized take-off configuration was increased by 6.6% as well as the stalling angle and the lift-to-drag ratio were increased by 1.3° and 7.58%, respectively. Moreover, the maximum lift coefficient of the optimized landing configuration was increased by 6.3%, and the stalling angle was increased by 1.1°; however, the nose-down pitching moment of both configurations increased. Similar results were attained on a general aviation aircraft wing/body combination. A 3D model of the variable-camber Fowler flap driving mechanism was established in a computer-aided design system, and the results showed that all design configurations could be achieved by the double-sliding track.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Barbarino S, Bilgen O, Ajaj R M, et al. A review of morphing aircraft. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2011, 22: 823–87710.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
2. Renken J H. Mission-adaptive wing camber control systems for transport aircraft. In: Proceedings of 3rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference. AIAA, 1985
3. Prasetyo E, Fielding J P. Civil-transport wing design concept exploiting new technologies. J Aircr, 2006, 43: 932–94010.2514/1.15556 ↗
4. Pecora R, Amoroso F, Magnifico M. Toward the bi-modal camber morphing of large aircraft wing flaps: The clean-sky experience. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures/NDE Conference. Las Vegas, 2016
5. Pecora R, Concilio A, Dimino A, et al. Structural design of an adaptive wing trailing edge for enhanced cruise performance. In: Proceedings of 24th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. San Diego, 2016
6. Ameduri S, Concilio A, Pecora R, et al. A single slotted morphing flap based on SMA technology. Smart Struct Syst, 2016, 17: 819–83510.12989/sss.2016.17.5.819 ↗
7. Pecora R, Amoroso F, Amendola G, et al. Validation of a smart structural concept for wing-flap cam-ber morphing. Smart Struct Syst, 2014, 14: 659–67810.12989/sss.2014.14.4.659 ↗
8. Dimino I, Flauto D, Diodati G, et al. Actuation system design for a morphing wing trailing edge. Recent Patens Mech Eng, 2014, 7: 138–14810.2174/2212797607666140429005538 ↗
9. Pecora R, Magnifico M, Amoroso F, et al. Multi-parametric flutter analysis of a morphing wing trailing edge. Aeronaut J, 2014, 118: 1063–107810.1017/S000192400000974X ↗
10. Claus B, Willi M, Hans-Friedrich S, et al. A new structural approach to variable camber wing technology of transport aircraft. In: Proceedings of 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, 1998
11. Fielding J P. Design investigation of variable-camber flaps for high-subsonic airliners. ICAS, 2000
12. Alexander B, Gilyard G B. Estimated benefits of variable-geometry wing camber control for transport aircraft. NASA/TM-206586, 1999
13. Strüber H. The aerodynamic design of the A350 XWB-900 high lift system. In: Proceedings of 29th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Petersburg, 2014
14. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787/#/design-highlights/visionar y-design/aerodynamics/advanced-fly-by-wire/
15. Ken T, Schulze E T. Delivering fuel and emissions savings for the B-777. AERO magazine, QTR_03 2009
16. ANSYS, Inc, ANSYS FLUENT User’s Guide, 2011
17. Valarezo W O, Dominik C J, McGhee R J, et al. High reynolds number configuration devel-opment of a high-lift airfoil. AGARD meet ing in high-lift aerodynamics, 1992
18. Chin V, Peters D W, Spaid F W, et al. Flowfield measurements about a multi-element airfoil at high reynolds numbers. AIAA 93-3137, 1993
19. Robert J M, William D B. Low speed aerodynamic characteristics of a 17-percent-thick airfoil section designed for general aviation applications. NASA TN D-7428, 1973
20. Wentz J W H, Seetbaram H C. Development of a Fowler flap system for a high performance general aviation airfoil. NASA CR-2443, 1974
21. Liu P, Li Ya L, Shu P. Aero-mechanism integrated design platform for high lift devices on large air-craft. Civil Aircr Des Res, 2013
22. Zhang X. Aircraft Design Manual-VI. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2002
23. Ma Y, Pang Y, Fan Y. Hydrodynamic optimization of 2D airfoil based on iSIGHT platform. J Ship Mech, 2011, 15: 867–873