journal article·2023-01

Low-resistance, high-force, and large-ROM fabric-based soft elbow exosuits with adaptive mechanism and composite bellows

WeiCheng Huang, Miao Feng, DeZhi Yang, GuoYing Gu

Publisher page

Abstract

Due to the lightweight and compliance, fabric-based pneumatic exosuits are promising in the assistance and rehabilitation of elbow impairments. However, existing elbow exosuits generally suffer from remarkable mechanical resistance on the flexion of the elbow, thus limiting the output force, range of motion (ROM), and comfortability. To address these challenges, we develop a fabric-based soft elbow exosuit with an adaptive mechanism and composite bellows in this work. With the elbow kinesiology considered, the adaptive mechanism is fabricated by sewing the interface of the exosuit into spring-like triangle pleats, following the profile of the elbow to elongate or contract when the elbow flexes or extends. The composite bellows are implemented by further sealing a single blade of bellows into two branches to enhance the output force. Based on these structural features, we characterize the mechanical performance of different soft elbow exosuits: exosuit with normal bellows-NB, exosuit with adaptive mechanism and normal bellows-AMNB, exosuit with adaptive mechanism and composite bellows-AMCB. Experimental results demonstrate that by comparing with NB, the mechanical resistance of AMNB and AMCB decreases by 80.6% and 78.6%, respectively; on the other hand, the output torque of AMNB and AMCB increases to 120.3% and 207.0%, respectively, at 50 kPa when the joint angle is 120°. By wearing these exosuits on a wooden arm model (1.25 kg), we further verify that AMCB can cover a full ROM of 0°–130° at the elbow with 500 g weight. Finally, the application on a health volunteer with AMCB shows that when the volunteer flexes the elbow to lift a weight of 500 g, the sEMG activity of the biceps and triceps is markedly reduced.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Robot Manipulation and Learning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Feigin V L, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): Global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke, 2022, 17: 18–2910.1177/17474930211065917 ↗
2. Hatem S M, Saussez G, Della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016, 10: 44210.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 ↗
3. Levin M F, Selles R W, Verheul M H G, et al. Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: Implications for normal motor control. Brain Res, 2000, 853: 352–36910.1016/S0006-8993(99)02298-2 ↗
4. Day J M, Lucado A M, Uhl T L. A comprehensive rehabilitation program for treating lateral elbow tendinopathy. Intl J Sports Phys Ther, 2019, 14: 818–82910.26603/ijspt20190818 ↗
5. Hu X, Tong K Y, Song R, et al. Variation of muscle coactivation patterns in chronic stroke during robot-assisted elbow training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88: 1022–102910.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.006 ↗
6. Hogan N, Krebs H I, Charnnarong J, et al. MIT-MANUS: A workstation for manual therapy and training I. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (ROMAN). Tokyo, 1992. 161–165
7. Nef T, Mihelj M, Riener R. ARMin: A robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. Med Bio Eng Comput, 2007, 45: 887–90010.1007/s11517-007-0226-6 ↗
8. Perry J C, Rosen J, Burns S. Upper-limb powered exoskeleton design. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2007, 12: 408–41710.1109/TMECH.2007.901934 ↗
9. Cianchetti M, Laschi C, Menciassi A, et al. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat Rev Mater, 2018, 3: 143–15310.1038/s41578-018-0022-y ↗
10. Zhang J, Sheng J, O’Neill C T, et al. Robotic artificial muscles: Current progress and future perspectives. IEEE Trans Robot, 2019, 35: 761–78110.1109/TRO.2019.2894371 ↗
11. Cappello L, Dinh Khanh B, Shih-Cheng Y, et al. Design and preliminary characterization of a soft wearable exoskeleton for upper limb. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). Singapore, 2016. 623–63010.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523695 ↗
12. Koo I, Yun C, Costa M V O, et al. Development of a meal assistive exoskeleton made of soft materials for polymyositis patients. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Chicago, 2014. 542–54710.1109/IROS.2014.6942612 ↗
13. Lessard S, Pansodtee P, Robbins A, et al. CRUX: A compliant robotic upper-extremity exosuit for lightweight, portable, multi-joint muscular augmentation. In: Proceeedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). London, 2017. 1633–163810.1109/ICORR.2017.8009482 ↗
14. Noritsugu T, Takaiwa M, Sasaki D. Power assist wear driven with pneumatic rubber artificial muscles. In: Proceeedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP). Auckland, 2008. 539–54410.1109/MMVIP.2008.4749589 ↗
15. Gao X F, Sun Y, Hao L, et al. A new type of soft pneumatic elbow. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Macao, 2017. 2681–268610.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324824 ↗
16. Wilkening A, Stöppler H, Ivlev O. Adaptive assistive control of a soft elbow trainer with self-alignment using pneumatic bending joint. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). Singapore, 2015. 729–73410.1109/ICORR.2015.7281288 ↗
17. Polygerinos P, Correll N, Morin S A, et al. Soft robotics: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction. Adv Eng Mater, 2017, 19: 170001610.1002/adem.201700016 ↗
18. Morris M, Shoham M, Nahon M, Applications and theoretical issues of cable-driven robots. In: Proceeedings of the Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics (FCRAR). Florida, 2009. 21–22
19. Park D, Cho K J. Development and evaluation of a soft wearable weight support device for reducing muscle fatigue on shoulder. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12: e017373010.1371/journal.pone.0173730 ↗
20. Bessler J, Prange-Lasonder G B, Schaake L, et al. Safety assessment of rehabilitation robots: A review identifying safety skills and current knowledge gaps. Front Robot AI, 2021, 8: 60287810.3389/frobt.2021.602878 ↗
21. Sanchez V, Walsh C J, Wood R J. Textile technology for soft robotic and autonomous garments. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 200827810.1002/adfm.202008278 ↗
22. O’Neill C T, Phipps N S, Cappello L, et al. A soft wearable robot for the shoulder: Design, characterization, and preliminary testing. In: Proceeedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). London, 2017. 1672–167810.1109/ICORR.2017.8009488 ↗
23. Koh T H, Cheng N, Yap H K, et al. Design of a soft robotic elbow sleeve with passive and intent-controlled actuation. Front Neurosci, 2017, 11: 59710.3389/fnins.2017.00597 ↗
24. Proietti T, O’Neill C, Hohimer C J, et al. Sensing and control of a multi-joint soft wearable robot for upper-limb assistance and rehabilitation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021, 6: 2381–238810.1109/LRA.2021.3061061 ↗
25. Thalman C M, Lam Q P, Nguyen P H, et al. A novel soft elbow exosuit to supplement bicep lifting capacity. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid, 2018. 6965–697110.1109/IROS.2018.8594403 ↗
26. Miller-Jackson T M, Li J, Natividad R F, et al. STAS: An antagonistic soft pneumatic actuator assembly for high torque output. In: Proceeedings of the IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). Seoul, 2019. 43–4810.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722791 ↗
27. Nassour J, Vaghani S, Hamker F H. Design of soft exosuit for elbow assistance using butyl rubber tubes and textile. In: Proceeedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Robotics (WeRob). Pisa, 2018. 420–42410.1007/978-3-030-01887-0_81 ↗
28. Nassour J, Zhao G, Grimmer M. Soft pneumatic elbow exoskeleton reduces the muscle activity, metabolic cost and fatigue during holding and carrying of loads. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 1–410.1038/s41598-021-91702-5 ↗
29. Neumann D A. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Mosby: Elsevier, 2010
30. Feng M, Yang D, Gu G. High-force fabric-based pneumatic actuators with asymmetric chambers and interference-reinforced structure for soft wearable assistive gloves. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021, 6: 3105–311110.1109/LRA.2021.3062588 ↗
31. Schuind F A, Goldschmidt D, Bastin C, et al. A biomechanical study of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. J Hand Surg, 1995, 20: 623–62710.1016/S0266-7681(05)80124-X ↗
32. Park J, Choi J, Kim S J, et al. Design of an inflatable wrinkle actuator with fast inflation/deflation responses for wearable suits. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020, 5: 3799–380510.1109/LRA.2020.2976299 ↗