journal article·2022-10

Dependency of the pulsed electrochemical machining characteristics of Inconel 718 in NaNO3 solution on the pulse current

JingTao Wang, ZhengYang Xu, TianYu Geng, Di Zhu

Publisher page

Abstract

Pulsed electrochemical machining (PECM) has attracted increasing interest as a technique to improve material dissolution localization and surface quality. This work systematically investigates the effects of pulse current on the surface morphology, profile accuracy, and corrosion behavior of Inconel 718 (IN718) in NaNO3 solution. Polarization behavior reveals that IN718 in NaNO3 solution during pulse current machining exhibited significant passive, transpassive, and re-passive characteristics. The passive film generated at the re-passive state contained some oxides and had a loose porous structure. The critical value for the quantity of electric charge to rupture the passive film was determined to be 26.88 C cm−2. The current efficiency indicates that the material removal rate of IN718 in NaNO3 solution during pulse current machining was nonlinear. The PECM experiments indicate that the loading process of the electrical double layer was prolonged with an increased workpiece scale, i.e., the loading process of the electrical double layer lasted for the entire pulse-on time when the workpiece scale was 100 mm2 at a frequency of more than 10 kHz regardless of the duty cycle. A pulse current with a short pulse length and short pulse period improved the profile accuracy, as did the low applied voltage and small workpiece scale. The dissolution mechanism of IN718 in NaNO3 solution was also investigated based on the effective pulse current time. Finally, the leading-edge structure of a ruled blade with good dimensional accuracy and surface quality was successfully fabricated. The maximum deviations of the machined profile were effectively restricted within 0.057 mm, and the surface roughness was Ra = 0.358 µm.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Cao W J, Wang D Y, Cui G W, et al. Anodic dissolution mechanism of TA15 titanium alloy during counter-rotating electrochemical machining. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1253–126210.1007/s11431-021-1999-7 ↗
2. Wang Y D, Xu Z Y, Zhang A, et al. Surface morphology and electrochemical behaviour of Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Nb alloy in low-concentration salt solution. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 64: 283–29610.1007/s11431-019-1558-8 ↗
3. Xu Z, Wang Y. Electrochemical machining of complex components of aero-engines: Developments, trends, and technological advances. Chin J Aeronaut, 2021, 34: 28–5310.1016/j.cja.2019.09.016 ↗
4. Wang J, Xu Z, Wang J, et al. Anodic dissolution characteristics of Inconel 718 in C6H5K3O7 and NaNO3 solutions by pulse electrochemical machining. Corrosion Sci, 2021, 183: 10933510.1016/j.corsci.2021.109335 ↗
5. Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S. State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2015, 100: 25–5410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.10.001 ↗
6. Schuster R, Kirchner V, Allongue P, et al. Electrochemical micromachining. Science, 2000, 289: 98–10110.1126/science.289.5476.98 ↗
7. Davydov A D, Volgin V M. Electrochemical machining. In: Bard A J, Stratmann M, eds. Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry, 5. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2007. 809–854
8. Sueptitz R, Dunne P, Tschulik K, et al. Electrochemical micromachining of passive electrodes. Electrochim Acta, 2013, 109: 562–56910.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.139 ↗
9. Vladimir M V, Victor V L, Tatyana B K, et al. Theoretical analysis of micro/nano electrochemical machining with ultra-short voltage pulses. Electrochim Acta, 2021, 369: 13766610.1016/j.electacta.2020.137666 ↗
10. Kozak J, Gulbinowicz D, Glubinowicz Z. The mathematical modeling and computer simulation of pulse electrochemical micromachining. Eng Lett, 2008, 16: 556–561
11. Mithu M A H, Fantoni G, Ciampi J. The effect of high frequency and duty cycle in electrochemical microdrilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2011, 55: 921–93310.1007/s00170-010-3123-3 ↗
12. Hotoiu E L, Van Damme S, Albu C, et al. Simulation of nano-second pulsed phenomena in electrochemical micromachining processes — Effects of the signal and double layer properties. Electrochim Acta, 2013, 93: 8–1610.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.093 ↗
13. Rosenkranz C, Lohrengel M M, Schultze J W. The surface structure during pulsed ECM of iron in NaNO3. Electrochim Acta, 2005, 50: 2009–201610.1016/j.electacta.2004.09.010 ↗
14. Meng L, Zeng Y, Fang X, et al. Micropatterning of Ni-based metallic glass by pulsed wire electrochemical micro machining. Intermetallics, 2017, 81: 16–2510.1016/j.intermet.2017.02.015 ↗
15. Favaro M, Jeong B, Ross P N, et al. Unravelling the electrochemical double layer by direct probing of the solid/liquid interface. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 1269510.1038/ncomms12695 ↗
16. Chen W, Han F, Wang J. Influence of pulse waveform on machining accuracy in electrochemical machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 96: 1367–137510.1007/s00170-018-1594-9 ↗
17. Luo J, Qi X, Fang X, et al. Electrochemical machining of microgrooves on flexible metallic foil using a tungsten arrayed microtool. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tech, 2021, 35: 604–61410.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.009 ↗
18. Fang X, Han Z, Chen M, et al. Pulse-current wire electrochemical machining with axial electrolyte flushing along a rotating helical wire tool. J Electrochem Soc, 2020, 167: 11350310.1149/1945-7111/aba33f ↗
19. Ahn S H, Ryu S H, Choi D K, et al. Electro-chemical micro drilling using ultra short pulses. Precis Eng, 2004, 28: 129–13410.1016/j.precisioneng.2003.07.004 ↗
20. Rajurkar K P, Zhu D, McGeough J A, et al. New developments in electro-chemical machining. CIRP Ann, 1999, 48: 567–57910.1016/S0007-8506(07)63235-1 ↗
21. Anderson M, Thielin A L, Bridier F, et al. δ Phase precipitation in Inconel 718 and associated mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2017, 679: 48–5510.1016/j.msea.2016.09.114 ↗
22. Khomenko V, Frackowiak E, Béguin F. Determination of the specific capacitance of conducting polymer/nanotubes composite electrodes using different cell configurations. Electrochim Acta, 2005, 50: 2499–250610.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.078 ↗
23. Stoller M D, Ruoff R S. Best practice methods for determining an electrode material’s performance for ultracapacitors. Energy Environ Sci, 2010, 3: 1294–130110.1039/c0ee00074d ↗
24. Popovich V A, Borisov E V, Popovich A A, et al. Impact of heat treatment on mechanical behaviour of Inconel 718 processed with tailored microstructure by selective laser melting. Mater Des, 2017, 131: 12–2210.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.065 ↗
25. You X, Tan Y, Zhao L, et al. Effect of solution heat treatment on microstructure and electrochemical behavior of electron beam smelted Inconel 718 superalloy. J Alloys Compd, 2018, 741: 792–80310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.159 ↗
26. Luo S, Huang W, Yang H, et al. Microstructural evolution and corrosion behaviors of Inconel 718 alloy produced by selective laser melting following different heat treatments. Addit Manuf, 2019, 30: 100875
27. Wang D, Zhu Z, Wang N, et al. Investigation of the electrochemical dissolution behavior of Inconel 718 and 304 stainless steel at low current density in NaNO3 solution. Electrochim Acta, 2015, 156: 301–30710.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.155 ↗
28. Lou H, Dong C F, Li X G, et al. The electrochemical behaviour of 2205 duplex stainless steel in alkaline solutions with different pH in the presence of chloride. Electrochim Acta, 2012, 64: 211–22010.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.025 ↗
29. Singh V B, Gupta A. Active, passive and transpassive dissolution of In-718 alloy in acidic solutions. Mater Chem Phys, 2004, 85: 12–1910.1016/j.matchemphys.2003.11.025 ↗
30. Schneider M, Schubert N, Höhn S, et al. Anodic dissolution behaviour and surface texture development of cobalt under electrochemical machining conditions. Electrochim Acta, 2013, 106: 279–28710.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.070 ↗
31. Zhu D, Yu L G, Zhang R H. Dissolution effects with different microstructures of Inconel 718 on surface integrity in electrochemical machining. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: E872–E87810.1149/2.0761816jes ↗
32. Pistorius P C, Burstein G T. Aspects of the effects of electrolyte composition on the occurrence of metastable pitting on stainless steel. Corrosion Sci, 1994, 36: 525–53810.1016/0010-938X(94)90041-8 ↗
33. Ge Y C, Zhu Z, Wang D. Electrochemical dissolution behavior of the nickel-based cast superalloy K423A in NaNO3 solution. Electrochim Acta, 2017, 253: 379–38910.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.046 ↗
34. Frangini S, Paoletti C, Della Seta L. Corrosion of inconel alloys for application as inert anodes in low-temperature molten carbonate electrolysis processes. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2021, 46: 14953–1496110.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.028 ↗
35. Xu Z, Chen X, Zhou Z, et al. Electrochemical machining of high-temperature titanium alloy Ti60. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 42: 125–13010.1016/j.procir.2016.02.206 ↗
36. Wang Y, Xu Z, Zhang A. Electrochemical dissolution behavior of Ti−45Al−2Mn−2Nb+0.8 vol% TiB2 XD alloy in NaCl and NaNO3 solutions. Corrosion Sci, 2019, 157: 357–36910.1016/j.corsci.2019.06.010 ↗
37. Ittah R, Amsellem E, Itzhak D. Pitting corrosion evaluation of titanium in NH4Br solutions by electrochemical methods. Int J Electrochem Sci, 2014, 9: 633–64310.1016/S1452-3981(23)07745-3 ↗
38. Sun M, Wu X, Zhang Z, et al. Analyses of oxide films grown on Alloy 625 in oxidizing supercritical water. J SuperCrit Fluids, 2008, 47: 309–31710.1016/j.supflu.2008.07.010 ↗
39. Biesinger M C, Payne B P, Grosvenor A P, et al. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl Surf Sci, 2011, 257: 2717–273010.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
40. Zhu X, Zhu Y, Murali S, et al. Nanostructured reduced graphene oxide/Fe2O3 composite as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 3333–333810.1021/nn200493r ↗
41. Ren Y, Gong T, Tan S, et al. Photocatalytic activities of g-C3N4, Bi3NbO7 and g-C3N4/Bi3NbO7 in photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). J Alloys Compd, 2022, 902: 16375210.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163752 ↗
42. Oku M, Hirokawa K. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of Co3O4, Fe3O4, Mn3O4, and related compounds. J Electron Spectr Relat Phenomena, 1976, 8: 475–48110.1016/0368-2048(76)80034-5 ↗
43. Liu L, Li Y, Wang F. Influence of micro-structure on corrosion behavior of a Ni-based superalloy in 3.5% NaCl. Electrochim Acta, 2007, 52: 7193–720210.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.043 ↗
44. Isaacs H S. The localized breakdown and repair of passive surfaces during pitting. Corrosion Sci, 1989, 29: 313–32310.1016/0010-938X(89)90038-3 ↗
45. Blasco-Tamarit E, Igual-Muñoz A, Antón J G, et al. Effect of temperature on the corrosion resistance and pitting behaviour of Alloy 31 in LiBr solutions. Corrosion Sci, 2008, 50: 1848–185710.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.016 ↗
46. Lohrengel M M, Klüppel I, Rosenkranz C, et al. Microscopic investigations of electrochemical machining of Fe in NaNO3. Electrochim Acta, 2003, 48: 3203–321110.1016/S0013-4686(03)00372-4 ↗
47. Lohrengel M M, Rataj K P, Münninghoff T. Electrochemical machining-mechanisms of anodic dissolution. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 201: 348–35310.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.219 ↗
48. Schubert N, Schneider M, Michealis A. The mechanism of anodic dissolution of cobalt in neutral and alkaline electrolyte at high current density. Electrochim Acta, 2013, 113: 748–75410.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.093 ↗
49. Guo C, Wu B, Xu B, et al. Investigation of pulse electrochemical machining of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses in NaNO3-ethylene glycol electrolyte. J Electrochem Soc, 2021, 168: 07150210.1149/1945-7111/ac0bf8 ↗
50. Haisch T, Mittemeijer E, Schultze J W. Electrochemical machining of the steel 100Cr6 in aqueous NaCl and NaNO3 solutions: Microstructure of surface films formed by carbides. Electrochim Acta, 2001, 47: 235–24110.1016/S0013-4686(01)00561-8 ↗
51. Liu W, Ao S, Li Y, et al. Effect of anodic behavior on electrochemical machining of TB6 titanium Alloy. Electrochim Acta, 2017, 233: 190–20010.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.025 ↗
52. Landolt D. Fundamental aspects of electropolishing. Electrochim Acta, 1987, 32: 1–1110.1016/0013-4686(87)87001-9 ↗